Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

고객이 실제로 리뷰를 작성한 시점을 기준으로 합니다. 초기의 호평이 유지되었는지 확인할 수 있습니다.

1. Q3 202058/1003.5★6 리뷰

   Buyers in this period praised the lens as lightweight, versatile, and sharp, but several reported autofocus misses and questioned its value for the price.

   • 👍Lightweight and versatile, with a wide shooting range and useful 24mm lock.
   • 👎Autofocus misses frequently, causing disappointment and lower ratings.
   • 👎Not worth the price; considered basic and unsuitable for travel.
   • 👍Sharp images and fast autofocus in some experiences.
2. Q2 202091/1004.8★8 리뷰

   Buyers in Q2 2020 praised the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and value, with some noting it is heavy.

   • 👍Sharpness praised across zoom range, often compared favorably to other L lenses.
   • 👍Build quality and solid feel appreciated, with good balance on R series cameras.
   • 👍Value for price highlighted, considered a great L lens option for RF mount.
   • 👎Weight noted as a drawback, especially when paired with heavier bodies like 5D Mark IV.
3. Q1 202091/1004.8★11 리뷰

   Buyers in Q1 2020 praised the RF 24-105mm lens for its sharpness, clarity, and versatility, often using it for travel and landscapes. One reviewer noted a delay in receiving a bundled filter, but overall sentiment was highly positive.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, compared to Zeiss primes.
   • 👍Versatile for travel, landscapes, and video, with good weight for gimbal use.
   • 👍Customizable control ring and switches appreciated for convenience.
   • 👎One buyer waited a month for a bundled filter, citing poor service.
4. Q4 201991/1004.9★10 리뷰

   Buyers praise the RF 24-105mm for its sharpness, lightweight build, and versatility, calling it a top all-around lens. One noted a defective first copy with a beeping noise, but the replacement was excellent.

   • 👍Sharpness is consistently praised, with multiple reviewers calling it 'razor sharp' or 'sharp as a tack'.
   • 👍Lightweight and compact design, fitting well in bags and balancing nicely on EOS R/RP bodies.
   • 👍Versatile all-around lens, suitable for various situations from airshows to portraits, meeting magazine standards.
   • 👎One reviewer reported a high-pitched beeping noise on their first copy, requiring a return; replacement was fine.
5. Q3 201991/1004.8★9 리뷰

   Buyers in Q3 2019 praised the lens for sharpness, versatility, and reliability, with many using it as a daily walk-around. Some noted it underperforms compared to primes or faster zooms, but overall satisfaction was high.

   • 👍Sharp images, smooth bokeh, fast autofocus, and excellent image quality, especially on EOS R.
   • 👍Versatile as a daily lens for walk-around, portraits, and events; often the most used lens.
   • 👍Durable and reliable; one user's 5-year-old copy survived drops and heavy use.
   • 🤔Some users found fewer sharp keepers than primes or 70-200 2.8, but acceptable in good light.
6. Q2 201996/1005.0★11 리뷰

   Buyers in Q2 2019 praised the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and versatility, often using it with EOS R/RP. They appreciated its compact size and value, with no negative comments.

   • 👍Sharp image quality and fast, quiet autofocus repeatedly highlighted.
   • 👍Versatile zoom range for portraits, landscapes, and architecture, reducing gear needs.
   • 👍Compact and lightweight design, especially noted for travel.
   • 👍Good value for an L-series lens, with several first-time L buyers satisfied.
7. Q1 201995/1005.0★8 리뷰

   Buyers in Q1 2019 praised the lens for sharpness, image quality, and versatility, often calling it a great all-around kit lens. Some noted the f/4 aperture as a limitation for low-light or portrait work.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality consistently praised, with multiple reviewers calling it excellent or amazing.
   • 👍Versatility as an all-around lens, suitable for various situations and often left on the camera.
   • 🤔Aperture f/4 seen as fine for landscape but limiting for astrophotography or portraits, wishing for f/2.8 or faster.
   • 👍Value for money, especially as a kit lens or on deal, with several noting it as a great purchase.
8. Q4 201882/1004.6★12 리뷰

   Buyers in Q4 2018 praised the lens for sharpness, versatility, and value, especially refurbished units. A few reported soft focus and software bundle issues.

   • 👍Sharp images and excellent results across various shooting conditions, including low light and portraits.
   • 👍Versatile focal range and constant f/4 aperture make it a great all-purpose walk-around lens.
   • 👍Refurbished units look and perform like new, offering great value and quality.
   • 👎One report of soft focus in portraits at multiple focal lengths, prompting contact with Canon support.
9. Q3 201890/1004.7★10 리뷰

   Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, versatility, and effective image stabilization, often using it as their primary lens. One reviewer reports backfocus issues, but the majority are highly satisfied.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, especially at 105mm, with beautiful bokeh for portraits.
   • 👍Versatile zoom range and image stabilization make it a go-to lens for travel and everyday use.
   • 👍Build and handling appreciated, though some note larger size and weight compared to other lenses.
   • 👎One reviewer reports backfocus issues, requiring reliance on version 1 as backup.
10. Q2 201893/1004.9★7 리뷰

    Buyers in Q2 2018 praised the lens as a sharp, versatile walk-around with improved IS and build quality over the Mark I, ideal for low light and landscapes.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, especially in corners and for landscapes.
    • 👍Improved image stabilization over Mark I, aiding low-light and slow-moving subjects.
    • 👍Versatile focal range (24-105mm) valued as a compromise between 24-70 and longer lenses.
    • 👍Build quality and weather sealing noted as superior to previous version.
11. Q1 201893/1004.8★6 리뷰

    Buyers in this period praised the lens as versatile, well-made, and great value, with fast shipping and good image quality. One noted a desire for a 2.8 version.

    • 👍Versatile all-purpose lens suitable for various photography needs.
    • 👍Good image quality, crisp and clear with pleasing background blur.
    • 👍Well-built and durable, with one buyer on their third copy.
    • 🤔Value praised, but some wished for a faster f/2.8 aperture version.
12. Q4 201778/1004.8★8 리뷰

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, color, and versatility, calling it a favorite. One defective refurbished copy was reported, but the buyer received a refund and praised the replacement.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised across reviews, with several calling it their go-to lens.
    • 👍Versatility for portraits, landscapes, and documentary work highlighted, with zoom range appreciated.
    • 🤔Weight and cost noted as drawbacks, but considered acceptable given the quality.
    • 👎One defective refurbished copy had electrical issues with image stabilization, but refund was issued.
13. Q3 201796/1005.0★9 리뷰

    Buyers in this period praised the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and improved image stabilization, with several noting it as a versatile go-to. One mentioned it is longer and heavier than the Mark I, and another noted a possible centering issue.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality are consistently praised, with one user noting tack sharp images on a 5DsR.
    • 👍Autofocus is described as speedy, dead on, and outstanding, contributing to overall satisfaction.
    • 👍Image stabilization is highlighted as excellent and better than the previous version, aiding handheld sharpness.
    • 🤔Size and weight increased compared to Mark I, which one user found less welcome; another noted a possible centering issue in the left corner.
14. Q2 201791/1004.9★7 리뷰

    Buyers upgrading from the original 24-105mm found the Mark II sharper, quieter IS, and lighter, though slightly heavier. It's praised as a versatile travel and all-around lens for both photos and video.

    • 👍Improved image quality and quieter IS compared to the original, especially noticeable on high-resolution bodies.
    • 👍Versatile focal length and lightweight design make it ideal for travel and everyday use.
    • 👍Lens lock feature and overall build improvements are appreciated by users.
    • 🤔Slightly heavier and larger than the original, but not a deal-breaker for most.
15. Q1 201791/1004.9★7 리뷰

    Buyers in Q1 2017 praised the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and low-light performance, noting it as a significant upgrade over older models. Some mentioned minor chromatic aberration and a tight zoom ring, but overall satisfaction was high.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, with users noting excellent clarity and performance in low light.
    • 👍Build quality and handling improvements over Mark I, including better IS and a 10-blade aperture for nicer sunstars.
    • 🤔Minor chromatic aberration in rare situations and a tight zoom ring, but not considered major issues.
    • 👍Versatile as an everyday lens, suitable for travel and professional use, with sturdy yet not too heavy design.

날짜가 있는 고객 리뷰 324건을 기준으로 달력 분기별로 묶었습니다. 기간별 분석은 영어로 제공됩니다.