Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。

1. Q3 202058/1003.5★6 レビュー

   Buyers in this period praised the lens as lightweight, versatile, and sharp, but several reported autofocus misses and questioned its value for the price.

   • 👍Lightweight and versatile, with a wide shooting range and useful 24mm lock.
   • 👎Autofocus misses frequently, causing disappointment and lower ratings.
   • 👎Not worth the price; considered basic and unsuitable for travel.
   • 👍Sharp images and fast autofocus in some experiences.
2. Q2 202091/1004.8★8 レビュー

   Buyers in Q2 2020 praised the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and value, with some noting it is heavy.

   • 👍Sharpness praised across zoom range, often compared favorably to other L lenses.
   • 👍Build quality and solid feel appreciated, with good balance on R series cameras.
   • 👍Value for price highlighted, considered a great L lens option for RF mount.
   • 👎Weight noted as a drawback, especially when paired with heavier bodies like 5D Mark IV.
3. Q1 202091/1004.8★11 レビュー

   Buyers in Q1 2020 praised the RF 24-105mm lens for its sharpness, clarity, and versatility, often using it for travel and landscapes. One reviewer noted a delay in receiving a bundled filter, but overall sentiment was highly positive.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, compared to Zeiss primes.
   • 👍Versatile for travel, landscapes, and video, with good weight for gimbal use.
   • 👍Customizable control ring and switches appreciated for convenience.
   • 👎One buyer waited a month for a bundled filter, citing poor service.
4. Q4 201991/1004.9★10 レビュー

   Buyers praise the RF 24-105mm for its sharpness, lightweight build, and versatility, calling it a top all-around lens. One noted a defective first copy with a beeping noise, but the replacement was excellent.

   • 👍Sharpness is consistently praised, with multiple reviewers calling it 'razor sharp' or 'sharp as a tack'.
   • 👍Lightweight and compact design, fitting well in bags and balancing nicely on EOS R/RP bodies.
   • 👍Versatile all-around lens, suitable for various situations from airshows to portraits, meeting magazine standards.
   • 👎One reviewer reported a high-pitched beeping noise on their first copy, requiring a return; replacement was fine.
5. Q3 201991/1004.8★9 レビュー

   Buyers in Q3 2019 praised the lens for sharpness, versatility, and reliability, with many using it as a daily walk-around. Some noted it underperforms compared to primes or faster zooms, but overall satisfaction was high.

   • 👍Sharp images, smooth bokeh, fast autofocus, and excellent image quality, especially on EOS R.
   • 👍Versatile as a daily lens for walk-around, portraits, and events; often the most used lens.
   • 👍Durable and reliable; one user's 5-year-old copy survived drops and heavy use.
   • 🤔Some users found fewer sharp keepers than primes or 70-200 2.8, but acceptable in good light.
6. Q2 201996/1005.0★11 レビュー

   Buyers in Q2 2019 praised the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and versatility, often using it with EOS R/RP. They appreciated its compact size and value, with no negative comments.

   • 👍Sharp image quality and fast, quiet autofocus repeatedly highlighted.
   • 👍Versatile zoom range for portraits, landscapes, and architecture, reducing gear needs.
   • 👍Compact and lightweight design, especially noted for travel.
   • 👍Good value for an L-series lens, with several first-time L buyers satisfied.
7. Q1 201995/1005.0★8 レビュー

   Buyers in Q1 2019 praised the lens for sharpness, image quality, and versatility, often calling it a great all-around kit lens. Some noted the f/4 aperture as a limitation for low-light or portrait work.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality consistently praised, with multiple reviewers calling it excellent or amazing.
   • 👍Versatility as an all-around lens, suitable for various situations and often left on the camera.
   • 🤔Aperture f/4 seen as fine for landscape but limiting for astrophotography or portraits, wishing for f/2.8 or faster.
   • 👍Value for money, especially as a kit lens or on deal, with several noting it as a great purchase.
8. Q4 201882/1004.6★12 レビュー

   Buyers in Q4 2018 praised the lens for sharpness, versatility, and value, especially refurbished units. A few reported soft focus and software bundle issues.

   • 👍Sharp images and excellent results across various shooting conditions, including low light and portraits.
   • 👍Versatile focal range and constant f/4 aperture make it a great all-purpose walk-around lens.
   • 👍Refurbished units look and perform like new, offering great value and quality.
   • 👎One report of soft focus in portraits at multiple focal lengths, prompting contact with Canon support.
9. Q3 201890/1004.7★10 レビュー

   Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, versatility, and effective image stabilization, often using it as their primary lens. One reviewer reports backfocus issues, but the majority are highly satisfied.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, especially at 105mm, with beautiful bokeh for portraits.
   • 👍Versatile zoom range and image stabilization make it a go-to lens for travel and everyday use.
   • 👍Build and handling appreciated, though some note larger size and weight compared to other lenses.
   • 👎One reviewer reports backfocus issues, requiring reliance on version 1 as backup.
10. Q2 201893/1004.9★7 レビュー

    Buyers in Q2 2018 praised the lens as a sharp, versatile walk-around with improved IS and build quality over the Mark I, ideal for low light and landscapes.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, especially in corners and for landscapes.
    • 👍Improved image stabilization over Mark I, aiding low-light and slow-moving subjects.
    • 👍Versatile focal range (24-105mm) valued as a compromise between 24-70 and longer lenses.
    • 👍Build quality and weather sealing noted as superior to previous version.
11. Q1 201893/1004.8★6 レビュー

    Buyers in this period praised the lens as versatile, well-made, and great value, with fast shipping and good image quality. One noted a desire for a 2.8 version.

    • 👍Versatile all-purpose lens suitable for various photography needs.
    • 👍Good image quality, crisp and clear with pleasing background blur.
    • 👍Well-built and durable, with one buyer on their third copy.
    • 🤔Value praised, but some wished for a faster f/2.8 aperture version.
12. Q4 201778/1004.8★8 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, color, and versatility, calling it a favorite. One defective refurbished copy was reported, but the buyer received a refund and praised the replacement.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised across reviews, with several calling it their go-to lens.
    • 👍Versatility for portraits, landscapes, and documentary work highlighted, with zoom range appreciated.
    • 🤔Weight and cost noted as drawbacks, but considered acceptable given the quality.
    • 👎One defective refurbished copy had electrical issues with image stabilization, but refund was issued.
13. Q3 201796/1005.0★9 レビュー

    Buyers in this period praised the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and improved image stabilization, with several noting it as a versatile go-to. One mentioned it is longer and heavier than the Mark I, and another noted a possible centering issue.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality are consistently praised, with one user noting tack sharp images on a 5DsR.
    • 👍Autofocus is described as speedy, dead on, and outstanding, contributing to overall satisfaction.
    • 👍Image stabilization is highlighted as excellent and better than the previous version, aiding handheld sharpness.
    • 🤔Size and weight increased compared to Mark I, which one user found less welcome; another noted a possible centering issue in the left corner.
14. Q2 201791/1004.9★7 レビュー

    Buyers upgrading from the original 24-105mm found the Mark II sharper, quieter IS, and lighter, though slightly heavier. It's praised as a versatile travel and all-around lens for both photos and video.

    • 👍Improved image quality and quieter IS compared to the original, especially noticeable on high-resolution bodies.
    • 👍Versatile focal length and lightweight design make it ideal for travel and everyday use.
    • 👍Lens lock feature and overall build improvements are appreciated by users.
    • 🤔Slightly heavier and larger than the original, but not a deal-breaker for most.
15. Q1 201791/1004.9★7 レビュー

    Buyers in Q1 2017 praised the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and low-light performance, noting it as a significant upgrade over older models. Some mentioned minor chromatic aberration and a tight zoom ring, but overall satisfaction was high.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, with users noting excellent clarity and performance in low light.
    • 👍Build quality and handling improvements over Mark I, including better IS and a 10-blade aperture for nicer sunstars.
    • 🤔Minor chromatic aberration in rare situations and a tight zoom ring, but not considered major issues.
    • 👍Versatile as an everyday lens, suitable for travel and professional use, with sturdy yet not too heavy design.

日付のある顧客レビュー 324 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。