Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011

The 10-core, 3.0GHz Xeon E5-2690 V2 delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for aging LGA 2011 server platforms with a substantial 25MB L3 cache. Its value is defined by a low entry price as a carefully inspected refurbished part, making it a practical drop-in upgrade for legacy dual-socket workstations. This processor is best for homelab builders running virtualized environments or budget-conscious users extending the life of older rendering servers.

Cores 10
L3 Cache 25 MB
TDP 130 W
Socket LGA 2011
Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011 cpu
42 Puntuación global
Precio 30 US$
También disponible en:

Resumen

The 30-Second Version

Ten cores for around 30 bucks. Great for homelab and server builds, terrible for gaming. If you have an LGA 2011 board, this is an easy yes.

Pros & Cons

Ventajas

  • Dirt cheap at around 30 USD 95th
  • Ten real cores for multi-threaded workloads 66th
  • 25MB of L3 cache helps with server tasks
  • LGA 2011 boards and DDR3 ECC RAM are plentiful on the used market

Desventajas

  • Single-thread performance is dated
  • 130W TDP means real heat and power draw
  • Gaming performance is a weak spot
  • No warranty beyond the refurb inspection

Las pruebas

Performance

The multi-thread score of 13295 in PassMark lands it in the middle of the pack overall, which sounds unimpressive until you remember this chip costs less than a pizza delivery for two. Ten physical cores at 3.0GHz will chew through VMs, Plex transcodes, and file server duties without breaking a sweat. Single-thread performance is where it shows its age. 1853 is fine for basic tasks but feels sluggish in anything latency-sensitive. The 130W TDP means you'll want decent cooling and a power supply that isn't from 2008.

Performance Percentiles

AI 50.8
Feature 20.6
Platform 56.8
Efficiency 56.9
Multi Thread 65.5
Valoración social 36.3
Affordability 94.6
Single Thread 47.4

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Xeon
Model E5-2690 V2
Class server

Cores & Clocks

Cores 10
Base Clock 3000

Cache

L3 Cache 25 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 13295
PassMark Single 1853

Memory

Max Speed 8000

Platform & Power

Socket LGA 2011
TDP 130

vs Competition

Against the Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2, the 2690 V2 gives you more cores but lower clocks, so it's a trade-off between parallel throughput and per-core speed. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 absolutely destroys this chip in single-thread and gaming, but it costs several times more and needs a newer platform. The be quiet! and Thermal Grizzly entries in the competitor list are coolers, not CPUs, so they're not really in the same conversation. For pure budget server work, the 2690 V2 holds its own against anything near its price.

Spec Intel E5-2690 V2 AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 CSF-AM5 NEKSKA Electric Garlic Chopper Mini 350ml
Cores 10 6 32 4 - -
Threads - 12 64 4 - -
Boost Clock Mhz - 4200 3500 3400 - -
L3 Cache Mb 25 16 256 8 - -
Tdp W 130 65 200 270 - 30
Socket LGA 2011 AMD Socket AM4 Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) AM4 AM5 -
Integrated Graphics - None No - - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Producto AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti ThreadValoración socialAffordabilitySingle Thread
Intel E5-2690 V2 50.820.656.856.965.536.394.647.4
AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Compare 73.889.272.486.274.396.487.881.4
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare 97.890.976.931.547.408851.6
be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare 44.962.761.226.646.390.376.150.9
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 CSF-AM5 Compare 3.220.617.43.43.496.497.82.9
NEKSKA Electric Garlic Chopper Mini 350ml Compare 3.220.617.43.43.436.399.52.9

Precio

Value & Pricing

At 30 USD, this is one of the best price-to-core ratios you'll find anywhere. The affordability score sits in the 95th percentile, which tracks. You're getting ten cores for the price of a cheap keyboard. The catch is the platform cost. LGA 2011 motherboards and registered ECC DDR3 aren't free, and if you don't already have them, the total build cost creeps up. But if you do have the board and RAM, this is a no-brainer.

Desde 30 US$ 1 oferta en 1 tienda
Amazon 1 oferta Desde 30 US$

Price History

30 US$ 30 US$ 30 US$ 30 US$ 30 US$ 13 jun18 jul31 oct 30 US$

Leer más

Overview

The Intel E5-2690 V2 is a decade-old server chip that still shows up in budget homelab builds for a reason. Ten cores, 25MB of L3 cache, and a 3.0GHz base clock on the LGA 2011 socket. It's a used refurb at this point, but at around 30 bucks, it's basically an impulse buy for anyone with a compatible board lying around.

This is not a gaming CPU. Not even close. But if you need cheap multi-threaded grunt for a NAS, a home server, or a virtualization box, this thing punches way above its price tag.

Common Questions

Q: Can I use this CPU for gaming?

You can, but you probably shouldn't. The single-thread score of 1853 and a gaming rating of 21.6 out of 100 mean modern titles will struggle, especially anything that leans on per-core speed.

Q: What kind of motherboard and RAM do I need?

You'll need an LGA 2011 socket motherboard. Most of these boards use DDR3, and for server workloads you'll likely want registered ECC DDR3, which is cheap and plentiful on the used market.

Q: Is a 130W TDP hard to cool?

It's not extreme by server standards, but you'll want a decent tower cooler or a server-grade heatsink with good airflow. Don't expect a tiny low-profile cooler to keep this thing happy under sustained load.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you're building a gaming rig or a daily driver desktop. The single-thread performance will frustrate you in everyday apps, and the gaming score is near the bottom of the barrel. Also skip it if you don't already have an LGA 2011 board, since hunting down a compatible motherboard and ECC DDR3 adds cost and hassle that might push you toward a newer budget platform instead.

Verdict

Buy this if you're building a homelab, a NAS, or a cheap virtualization server and you already have or can find an LGA 2011 board. It's a workhorse for parallel tasks and the price is almost impossible to beat. Just don't expect it to feel snappy in single-threaded desktop apps or games.

Usage Scores

General (42.2)AI/LLM (38.9)Budget (43.3)Gaming (22)Server (48.6)Efficiency (27.3)Productivity (53.4)
  • General42.2
  • AI/LLM38.9
  • Budget43.3
  • Gaming22
  • Server48.6
  • Efficiency27.3
  • Productivity53.4

Otras configuraciones1

Productos similares