Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011
The 10-core, 3.0GHz Xeon E5-2690 V2 delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for aging LGA 2011 server platforms with a substantial 25MB L3 cache. Its value is defined by a low entry price as a carefully inspected refurbished part, making it a practical drop-in upgrade for legacy dual-socket workstations. This processor is best for homelab builders running virtualized environments or budget-conscious users extending the life of older rendering servers.
Sem preço atual de lojas
Resumo
The 30-Second Version
Ten cores for around 30 bucks. Great for homelab and server builds, terrible for gaming. If you have an LGA 2011 board, this is an easy yes.
Pros & Cons
Prós
- Dirt cheap at around 30 USD 95th
- Ten real cores for multi-threaded workloads 66th
- 25MB of L3 cache helps with server tasks
- LGA 2011 boards and DDR3 ECC RAM are plentiful on the used market
Contras
- Single-thread performance is dated
- 130W TDP means real heat and power draw
- Gaming performance is a weak spot
- No warranty beyond the refurb inspection
As provas
Performance
The multi-thread score of 13295 in PassMark lands it in the middle of the pack overall, which sounds unimpressive until you remember this chip costs less than a pizza delivery for two. Ten physical cores at 3.0GHz will chew through VMs, Plex transcodes, and file server duties without breaking a sweat. Single-thread performance is where it shows its age. 1853 is fine for basic tasks but feels sluggish in anything latency-sensitive. The 130W TDP means you'll want decent cooling and a power supply that isn't from 2008.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Xeon |
| Model | E5-2690 V2 |
| Class | server |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 10 |
| Base Clock | 3000 |
Cache
| L3 Cache | 25 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 13295 |
| PassMark Single | 1853 |
Memory
| Max Speed | 8000 |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA 2011 |
| TDP | 130 |
vs Competition
Against the Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2, the 2690 V2 gives you more cores but lower clocks, so it's a trade-off between parallel throughput and per-core speed. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 absolutely destroys this chip in single-thread and gaming, but it costs several times more and needs a newer platform. The be quiet! and Thermal Grizzly entries in the competitor list are coolers, not CPUs, so they're not really in the same conversation. For pure budget server work, the 2690 V2 holds its own against anything near its price.
| Spec | Intel E5-2690 V2 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | SMC EPYC 9555P | HP Xeon 6526Y | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 16 | 64 | 16 | 24 | - |
| Threads | - | 32 | 128 | 32 | 48 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | - | 5700 | 4400 | 3900 | 4000 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 25 | 128 | 256 | 37 | 128 | - |
| Tdp W | 130 | 120 | 360 | 195 | 200 | - |
| Socket | LGA 2011 | AM5 | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA 4677 | AMD Socket SP3 | - |
| Integrated Graphics | - | AMD Radeon Graphics | - | No | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produto | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Prova social | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel E5-2690 V2 | 50.8 | 20.6 | 56.8 | 56.9 | 65.5 | 36.3 | 94.6 | 47.4 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Compare | 96 | 98.6 | 92.4 | 97 | 95.7 | 84.4 | 14.5 | 92.9 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.2 | 96.8 | 89.6 | 99.4 | 0 | 0.4 | 85.9 |
| HP Xeon 6526Y Compare | 92.1 | 77.2 | 90.8 | 79.3 | 89.9 | 0 | 2.7 | 80.5 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.8 | 77.2 | 84.5 | 85.1 | 93.9 | 36.3 | 5.1 | 80.4 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.8 | 20.6 | 17.4 | 66.5 | 97.1 | 0 | 6.3 | 98.4 |
Preço
Value & Pricing
At 30 USD, this is one of the best price-to-core ratios you'll find anywhere. The affordability score sits in the 95th percentile, which tracks. You're getting ten cores for the price of a cheap keyboard. The catch is the platform cost. LGA 2011 motherboards and registered ECC DDR3 aren't free, and if you don't already have them, the total build cost creeps up. But if you do have the board and RAM, this is a no-brainer.
Saiba mais
Overview
The Intel E5-2690 V2 is a decade-old server chip that still shows up in budget homelab builds for a reason. Ten cores, 25MB of L3 cache, and a 3.0GHz base clock on the LGA 2011 socket. It's a used refurb at this point, but at around 30 bucks, it's basically an impulse buy for anyone with a compatible board lying around.
This is not a gaming CPU. Not even close. But if you need cheap multi-threaded grunt for a NAS, a home server, or a virtualization box, this thing punches way above its price tag.
Common Questions
Q: Can I use this CPU for gaming?
You can, but you probably shouldn't. The single-thread score of 1853 and a gaming rating of 21.6 out of 100 mean modern titles will struggle, especially anything that leans on per-core speed.
Q: What kind of motherboard and RAM do I need?
You'll need an LGA 2011 socket motherboard. Most of these boards use DDR3, and for server workloads you'll likely want registered ECC DDR3, which is cheap and plentiful on the used market.
Q: Is a 130W TDP hard to cool?
It's not extreme by server standards, but you'll want a decent tower cooler or a server-grade heatsink with good airflow. Don't expect a tiny low-profile cooler to keep this thing happy under sustained load.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're building a gaming rig or a daily driver desktop. The single-thread performance will frustrate you in everyday apps, and the gaming score is near the bottom of the barrel. Also skip it if you don't already have an LGA 2011 board, since hunting down a compatible motherboard and ECC DDR3 adds cost and hassle that might push you toward a newer budget platform instead.
Verdict
Buy this if you're building a homelab, a NAS, or a cheap virtualization server and you already have or can find an LGA 2011 board. It's a workhorse for parallel tasks and the price is almost impossible to beat. Just don't expect it to feel snappy in single-threaded desktop apps or games.
Usage Scores
- Geral42.2
- AI/LLM38.9
- Budget43.3
- Jogos22
- Server48.6
- Efficiency27.3
- Productivity53.4