Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC 57" Black 2023

★★★★★ 4.5 (3,056)

{"review": "Квантова матриця з 2392 зонами локального затемнення та пікова яскравість 1000 ніт забезпечують винятковий HDR-контраст на величезному 57-дюймовому DUHD-екрані. Вигнутий 1000R VA-дисплей з роздільною здатністю 7680x2160 та щільністю 140 PPI фактично замінює два 4K-монітори без рамок, створюючи безшовне робоче та ігрове поле. Цей монітор найкраще підходить для симуляторних геймерів та розробників, яким потрібна максимальна периферійна видимість і величезний простір для багатозадачності на одному екрані."}

Screen 57"
Resolution 7680 x 2160
Panel VA
Refresh 240 Hz
response time ms 1
adaptive sync FreeSync Premium Pro
HDR HDR10+
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC 57" Black 2023 monitor
86 Загальна оцінка
Також доступно в:

Огляд

The 30-Second Version

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" is the highest-ranked display in our database, combining dual 4K resolution, a 240Hz refresh rate, and stunning mini LED HDR into one massive curved panel. It's a productivity and gaming monster, but it demands a top-tier GPU and a lot of desk space. Pricing is inconsistent, so shop around, but if you find it under $2,500, it's a phenomenal deal for what you're getting.

Pros & Cons

Переваги

  • Best-in-class display with dual 4K resolution and 140 PPI sharpness 100th
  • Incredible HDR with 1,000 nits brightness and 2,392 local dimming zones 97th
  • 240Hz refresh rate with DP 2.1 for uncompressed full-resolution gaming 97th
  • Massive 57-inch 1000R curve for total immersion in sims and RPGs 94th
  • Surprisingly versatile with KVM, USB hub, and multiple HDMI 2.1 ports

Недоліки

  • Requires a top-tier GPU to hit 240Hz at full resolution
  • Weighs over 41 pounds and needs a seriously deep desk
  • 349W power draw is higher than some entire PC builds
  • Price swings wildly between vendors, from $1,440 to over $7,000
  • No built-in speakers despite the premium price tag

Думка власників

The Word on the Street

4.5/5 (3056 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently describe the immersion as unmatched, with many saying it completely transforms sim racing and open-world games.
👍 A recurring theme is that the monitor excels for productivity, with users loving the ability to replace a multi-monitor setup with a single seamless screen.
👎 Several buyers report quality control issues, including units that failed after a short period and required warranty service or replacement.
🤔 Many users caution that you need a very powerful GPU to take full advantage of the resolution and refresh rate, with some feeling misled about HDMI 2.1 limitations.

Як змінювалася думка власників із часом

Ексклюзив

На основі того, коли покупці справді писали відгуки, - щоб побачити, чи виправдалися перші похвали.

Думка власників залишалася стабільною з часом
65/100Наш ШІ-аналіз настроївсередня впевненість · 9 джерел · трав. 2026 р.
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '23: 5.0★ · 2 відгуківQ1 '24: 4.8★ · 12 відгуківQ2 '24: 4.5★ · 24 відгуківQ3 '24: 4.8★ · 23 відгуківQ4 '24: 4.5★ · 24 відгуківQ1 '25: 4.6★ · 25 відгуківQ2 '25: 4.1★ · 15 відгуківQ3 '25: 4.9★ · 22 відгуківQ4 '25: 4.6★ · 22 відгуківQ1 '26: 4.5★ · 29 відгуківQ2 '26: 4.4★ · 25 відгуківQ3 '26: 5.0★ · 3 відгуків2122423242515222229253Q4 '23Q1 '24Q2 '24Q3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26Q3 '26
Середня оцінкаЗадоволені (4-5★)Незадоволені (1-2★)Висота стовпчика = кількість відгуків
  1. Q2 202674/1004.5★19 відгуків

    Most praise the monitor for work and gaming, but a few report defects, misleading 240Hz specs, and second-hand warranty issues.

    • Excellent for productivity and gaming with sharp image and immersive ultrawide view.
    • Screen tear and early failure reported; warranty denial for second owner.
    • Does not support 240Hz at native 5120x1440 resolution, only at 7680x2160.
    • Some experience heat emission, others report no heat or noise issues.
  2. Q1 202672/1004.4★31 відгуків

    Q1 2026 buyers praise the immersive size, resolution, and gaming performance, but defect and reliability issues are a recurring concern.

    • Impressive size, resolution, and immersion for gaming and productivity.
    • Requires powerful GPU and proper cables to avoid performance issues.
    • Reports of dead pixels, defective units, and heat output.
    • Lacks auto-input switching and is heavy/bulky.
  3. Q4 202578/1004.7★23 відгуків

    Buyers praise massive screen real estate, sharp image, and productivity boost. Several report noise issues (tapping/popping) and firmware update failures.

    • Massive curved screen real estate ideal for productivity and immersion.
    • Excellent image quality, sharp text, bright, crisp for work and gaming.
    • Noise complaints: tapping/popping sounds from inside the monitor reported.
    • Hardware requirements high; some need specific GPUs or cables to achieve full specs.
  4. Q3 202592/1004.9★24 відгуків

    Buyers in Q3 2025 praise this 57-inch ultrawide for immersive gaming and productivity, noting extreme screen real estate, sharp 8K-like resolution, and vibrant colors. Some report heat, blooming, short cables, and tricky full 240Hz setup.

    • Screen real estate and resolution praised for productivity and gaming immersion.
    • 240Hz at full resolution requires DP 2.1 UHBR80 cable and compatible GPU; setup can be tricky.
    • Monitor runs hot; blooming noticeable vs OLED; short included cables.
    • No remote control; small bottom buttons; Samsung support criticized; warranty concerns noted.
  5. Q2 202569/1004.2★16 відгуків

    Reviewers love the immersive gaming, massive productivity screen, and high resolution, but some report receiving wrong size, defective units, or terrible return/refund service.

    • Immersive for gaming (sim racing, RPGs) and productivity with multiple windows open.
    • High resolution and clarity (7K effective) praised for software development, data analysis, general multitasking.
    • Severe complaints about Samsung direct returns/refunds, defective units, and customer service.
    • Wish list: remote, easier BIOS access, better ergonomics (neck strain), and OLED version.
  6. Q1 202585/1004.6★26 відгуків

    Buyers praise the immersive display, productivity benefits, and vibrant colors. Common issues: dead units, lack of auto source switching, and demanding GPU requirements.

    • Monitors dying within 3 months; one user reports no picture after first month.
    • Large screen real estate praised for productivity and gaming immersion.
    • Requires powerful GPU; many stuck at 120Hz due to hardware limits.
    • KVM, auto-switching, and smart features buggy or missing for some users.
  7. Q4 202488/1004.5★24 відгуків

    Buyers love the massive screen for productivity and immersive gaming, but note GPU limitations for 240Hz, quality control issues, and poor customer support.

    • Excellent for productivity with vast screen real estate, multitasking, and crisp visuals.
    • Requires DisplayPort 2.0 for full 4K 240Hz; many GPUs like RTX 4090 cannot achieve it.
    • Some units have dead pixels, DSE, or diagonal lines, and customer support for issues is poor.
    • Menu control switch is clunky and cheap-feeling; stand legs consume significant desk space.
  8. Q3 202470/1004.6★24 відгуків

    Buyers praise the massive size, immersion, and resolution for productivity and gaming. However, several report a problematic aggressive curve, G-Sync flickering, sleep/wake issues, and color shift on the VA panel.

    • Massive size, immersion, and high resolution praised for productivity and gaming.
    • Aggressive curve tapers to flat sides causing dizziness and headaches.
    • G-Sync flickering and sleep/wake issues requiring cable reconnection or restart.
    • VA panel has color shift and less saturated blacks compared to OLED.
  9. Q2 202476/1004.5★24 відгуків

    Buyers praise the size, immersion, and productivity of this monitor but note quality control issues, a too-short DisplayPort cable, and clunky on-screen controls.

    • Massive screen size and curve praised for immersion and productivity.
    • Some units have dead pixels, diagonal lines, or flickering requiring firmware fixes.
    • Included DisplayPort cable is too short to reach the computer tower.
    • Menu button and limited PBP/input switching are common frustrations.
  10. Q1 202482/1004.7★17 відгуків

    Buyers love the immersive size and productivity gains, calling it a dual 4K monitor replacement. Several report issues with the advertised dual-monitor mode, Mac compatibility, and needing powerful hardware.

    • Massive 57-inch screen delivers an immersive experience for work and gaming.
    • Dual-monitor mode disables HDR, 240Hz, and other key features, misleading buyers.
    • Requires a very powerful GPU (e.g., RTX 4090) and works best with PCs, not Macs.
    • Zero dead pixels or issues for most, but a few note physical size and assembly difficulty.

На основі 226 датованих відгуків покупців, згрупованих за календарними кварталами. Аналіз за періодами - англійською.

Факти

Performance

The 240Hz refresh rate and 1ms GtG response time put this panel in the 88th percentile for performance, which is impressive given the sheer number of pixels it's pushing. In real-world terms, motion clarity is excellent. Fast-paced shooters feel responsive, and the mini LED backlight keeps dark scenes from turning into a smeary mess. The DisplayPort 2.1 support is a big deal here, it's one of the few monitors that can handle the full 7680x2160 resolution at 240Hz without relying on display stream compression, assuming your GPU also supports DP 2.1.

HDR performance is where this monitor really flexes. With 1,000 nits peak brightness and a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio, highlights pop and shadows stay inky. The 2,392 dimming zones aren't quite OLED-level per-pixel control, but they're close enough that blooming is minimal in most content. Our color data puts it in the 99th percentile, so it's not just bright, it's accurate. You could genuinely do color-critical work on this thing, which is wild for a gaming monitor.

Performance Percentiles

Color 96.8
Портативність 31.9
Display 99.7
Feature 97.1
User Sentiment 13.1
Ergonomic 72.9
Performance 87.8
Connectivity 93.5
Відгуки користувачів 90.4

Specifications

Full Specifications

Display

Size 57"
Resolution 7680x2160
Panel Type VA
Aspect Ratio 32:9
Curved Yes
Curvature 1000

Performance

Refresh Rate 240 Hz
Response Time 1
Adaptive Sync FreeSync Premium Pro

Color & HDR

Brightness 420 nits
Color Gamut 95% DCI-P3
Color Depth 10-bit
HDR HDR10+
HDR Support HDR10+

Connectivity

HDMI Ports 3
DisplayPort 1
USB-C 0
Thunderbolt 0
Speakers No
Headphone Jack Yes

Ergonomics

Height Adjustable Yes
Tilt Yes
Swivel Yes
Pivot No
VESA Mount 100x100

Features

Webcam No
Touchscreen No
PIP/PBP Yes
Power 300
Weight 19.0 kg / 41.9 lbs

vs Competition

The LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the OLED alternative. It's smaller at 45 inches and has a lower resolution, but you get those perfect blacks and instant pixel response that OLED fans love. The trade-off is text clarity and peak brightness, the Samsung gets much brighter and is far sharper for desktop work. The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG is a completely different beast, a 27-inch 1440p OLED. It's a competitive esports monitor, not an immersion machine. If you're a Counter-Strike player, get the ASUS. If you play Flight Simulator or do video editing, the Samsung is the obvious pick.

Then there's the Dell UltraSharp U4025QW, a 40-inch 5K2K monitor aimed squarely at professionals. It has a built-in Thunderbolt hub and better color accuracy out of the box, but it's locked to 120Hz and lacks the gaming chops. The Samsung splits the difference beautifully. It's a top-tier gaming monitor that also happens to be a productivity monster, which is something neither the pure gaming screens nor the pure professional screens can claim.

Spec Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC 57" LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Alienware AW-Series AW2725D
Screen Size 57 44.5 26.5 27 39.70000076293945 27
Resolution 7680 x 2160 5120 x 2160 2560 x 1440 2560 x 1440 5120 x 2160 2560 x 1440
Panel Type VA OLED OLED QD-OLED IPS QD-OLED
Refresh Rate 240 165 240 240 120 280
Response Time Ms 1 0.029999999329447746 0.029999999329447746 0.029999999329447746 5 0.029999999329447746
Adaptive Sync FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium Pro Adaptive-Sync FreeSync Premium Pro
Hdr HDR10+ DisplayHDR True Black 400 HDR10 DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR 600 DisplayHDR 400 True Black
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Товар ColorПортативністьDisplayFeatureUser SentimentErgonomicPerformanceConnectivityВідгуки користувачів
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC 57" 96.831.999.797.113.172.987.893.590.4
LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B Compare 99.482.299.797.174.690.596.39795.3
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG Compare 96.773.675.872.195.790.59893.590.4
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Compare 9963.576.685.995.790.59882.199.5
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Compare 97.882.295.597.1090.556.699.395.3
Alienware AW-Series AW2725D Compare 98.484.976.672.195.790.599.395.599.9

Ціна

Value & Pricing

Pricing on this monitor is all over the map. We've seen it listed anywhere from $1,440 to a frankly absurd $72,450 across different vendors. The sweet spot seems to be around the $2,000 to $2,500 range for a new unit, with open-box deals dipping closer to that $1,440 mark. At that lower end, you're getting a dual 4K, 240Hz mini LED panel for less than some high-end OLEDs, which is a steal. At the high end, you're being taken for a ride.

Compared to something like a 49-inch OLED ultrawide, you're trading perfect blacks for higher peak brightness and much sharper text. For mixed use, gaming and productivity, the Neo G9's resolution advantage is hard to overstate. It's genuinely like having two 32-inch 4K monitors without a bezel in the middle. If you can find it at a reasonable price, the value proposition is strong, especially since it scores a perfect 100 for office use in our database.

Докладніше

Overview

The Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" is the kind of monitor that makes you rethink your entire desk setup. It's essentially two 4K screens fused into one massive 57-inch, 32:9 curved panel, and it lands in the 100th percentile for display in our database. That's not a typo. It's literally the best we've tracked. This thing is for the gamer who also does serious work, the sim-racer who wants full peripheral vision, or anyone who has ever thought 'I wish my monitor was wider than my wingspan.'

What makes it interesting isn't just the size, it's the tech crammed inside. You get a 240Hz refresh rate, a 1ms response time, and Quantum Mini LED backlighting with 2,392 local dimming zones. That combo means you're not sacrificing speed for image quality. The 1000R curve wraps the screen around you, and at 140 PPI, the pixel density is sharp enough that you won't see individual dots even sitting this close to a screen the size of a small car windshield.

But let's be real: this monitor is a commitment. It weighs over 41 pounds without the stand, pulls up to 349 watts, and demands a GPU that can actually drive dual 4K at high refresh rates. If you've got an RTX 4090 and a deep desk, you're the target audience. If you're on a mid-range card, you'll be leaving a lot of performance on the table.

Common Questions

Q: Can my GPU actually run this monitor at full resolution and 240Hz?

You'll need a GPU with DisplayPort 2.1 to hit the full 7680x2160 at 240Hz without compression. As of now, that's basically limited to AMD's Radeon RX 7000 series. NVIDIA's RTX 40 series uses DP 1.4, which can still drive the monitor but will rely on display stream compression. Over HDMI 2.1, you're capped at 120Hz at full resolution. For most games, even an RTX 4090 will struggle to push native dual 4K at high frame rates, so expect to use DLSS or lower settings in demanding titles.

Q: Is the text clarity good enough for office work?

Yes, it's excellent. At 140 PPI, the pixel density is similar to a 32-inch 4K monitor, which means text is sharp and easy to read. The VA panel doesn't have the same sub-pixel structure issues as some OLEDs, so you won't see color fringing around text. We scored it a perfect 100 for office use, and many owners report using it as their primary work display.

Q: How does the HDR compare to an OLED?

It's a trade-off. The Neo G9 gets significantly brighter, up to 1,000 nits peak, which makes highlights in HDR content really pop. The 2,392 dimming zones provide deep blacks, but you may notice slight blooming around bright objects on dark backgrounds. OLEDs have perfect per-pixel blacks but lower peak brightness. For a bright room or mixed use, the Samsung's HDR is arguably more impactful. In a dark room, an OLED will have the edge in contrast.

Q: Will this monitor fit on my desk?

Measure carefully. The monitor is about 57 inches wide and the stand is deep, you'll want a desk that's at least 30 inches deep to maintain a comfortable viewing distance. It also weighs over 41 pounds without the stand, so make sure your desk can support it. A monitor arm is an option since it supports VESA 100x100, but you'll need a heavy-duty one rated for the weight.

Who Should Skip This

If you're primarily a competitive esports player, skip this. A 27-inch 1440p 360Hz or 480Hz monitor will give you higher frame rates and let you see the entire screen without turning your head. The sheer size of the Neo G9 is actually a disadvantage in twitch shooters where you need to track a minimap in your peripheral vision. Look at the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG or a similar high-refresh 1440p OLED instead.

You should also skip this if your GPU is anything less than an RTX 4080 or RX 7900 XT. Driving dual 4K at playable frame rates requires serious horsepower, and you'll be frustrated if you're stuck at lower resolutions or refresh rates. If you want the ultrawide experience but don't have the GPU budget, a 3440x1440 OLED like the Alienware AW3425DW is a much more manageable option that still looks fantastic.

Verdict

If you're a sim racer, flight sim enthusiast, or someone who works with massive timelines and spreadsheets all day, this monitor is a dream. The 1000R curve and 57-inch width fill your peripheral vision in a way that flat screens or smaller ultrawides just can't match. The dual 4K resolution means you can have a full-size 4K game window and still have room for Discord, a browser, and a video feed on the sides. It's the ultimate no-compromise display for a very specific kind of power user.

For everyone else, it's probably overkill. Most gamers don't need 7680x2160 resolution, and most GPUs can't drive it at high frame rates anyway. If you're mostly playing competitive shooters or MOBAs, a 27-inch 1440p 360Hz monitor will serve you better and cost less. But if you want the absolute best ultrawide experience available right now, and you have the hardware and desk space to support it, the Neo G9 57" is in a class of its own.

Usage Scores

Загалом (86.4)Ігри (97.6)Office (96.1)Creative (86.8)Portable (12.2)Professional (81.6)Розваги (98.3)

Схожі товари