MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ventus 2X OC 12GB GDDR6 Black

★★★★☆ 4.2 (4)

The 12GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 192-bit bus stands out for memory-intensive tasks, providing a capacity advantage over typical 8GB cards in its class. The dual-fan Torx design keeps the factory-overclocked 1710MHz boost chip cool in a compact, dual-slot form factor suitable for smaller builds. This card is best for budget-conscious 3D rendering artists or AI hobbyists who need a large 12GB frame buffer but do not prioritize high-framerate 1080p gaming.

GPU GeForce RTX 3060
VRAM 12GB GDDR6
Boost Clock 1807 MHz
TDP 170 W
Memory Bus 192 bit
Ray Tracing Oui
Class consumer
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ventus 2X OC 12GB GDDR6 Black gpu
55 Score global
Prix 73 980 JPY
Aussi disponible dans:

Aperçu

Avantages et inconvénients

Points forts

  • Strong feature (90th percentile) 90th
  • Strong connectivity (71st percentile) 71st

Points faibles

  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average compute (35th percentile)

L'avis des propriétaires

L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps

Exclusivité

D'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.

L'avis des propriétaires s'est amélioré avec le temps
78/100Notre analyse IA du ressenticonfiance élevée · 42 sources · nov. 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '21: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '22: 4.0★ · 1 avisQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '22: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '23: 4.5★ · 2 avisQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ2 '24: 5.0★ · 3 avisQ4 '24: 3.0★ · 2 avisQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 3 avisQ1 '26: 1.0★ · 1 avisQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '26: 5.0★ · 2 avis11112223123112Q4 '21Q2 '22Q3 '23Q1 '24Q3 '24Q2 '25Q2 '26Q3 '26
Note moyenneSatisfaits (4-5★)Insatisfaits (1-2★)Hauteur des barres = nombre d'avis
  1. Q2 202688/1004.7★29 avis

    Buyers praise the card for solid 1080p gaming performance, easy installation, quiet operation, and good value. One defect report and a software complaint are the main negatives.

    • Strong 1080p performance at high/ultra settings; handles modern games and VRAM-intensive titles well.
    • Easy installation, quiet fans, and cool temperatures during extended use.
    • One verified review reports a faulty unit; a separate complaint about Dragon Center software for 3rd party apps.
    • Good value for budget builds; effective upgrade from older cards like GTX 960, 1050 Ti, and 1080 Ti.
  2. Q1 2026100/1005.0★3 avis

    Buyers report flawless performance, quiet operation, and good value. The GPU delivers expected speed, high fps, and no reliability issues.

    • Excellent performance with high fps and smooth gameplay across all games.
    • Quieter than expected; noise levels are low and acceptable.
    • Reliable with no crashes or problems after 6 months of use.
    • Great value for a budget-friendly, popular graphics card.
  3. Q4 202582/1004.7★3 avis

    Buyers in Q4 2025 praised compute speed and multitasking stability for work; one noted minor compatibility setup for Linux/CUDA.

    • CUDA compute performance is fast with 12GB memory, well-suited for AI workloads.
    • Multitasking and dual-monitor stability flawless under heavy loads; no crashes.
    • Linux/ROCM setup requires workarounds; DaVinci Resolve finicky initially.
    • Compact, dual-fan design fits most cases; runs cool and quiet.
  4. Q4 202373/1005.0★3 avis

    Gamers report excellent 1080p performance in most titles, with occasional RAM-related lag in heavy games. One reviewer upgraded from a dead 20-series with no issues.

    • Excellent 1080p gaming performance; handles demanding games and shaders well.
    • Some lag in Fortnite and heavy Minecraft shaders, but attributed to insufficient RAM (16GB).
    • Easy upgrade from prior GeForce card; plug-and-play setup, quick delivery.
    • Requires a 600W PSU (minimum), one reviewer had to upgrade from 500W.

D'après 23 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.

Les preuves

Performances

Percentiles de performance

AI 51.3
Rt 45.5
Vram 52.2
Raster 39.3
Compute 34.7
Feature 90
Thermal 56.6
User Sentiment 45.5
Efficiency 61
Connectivity 70.7
Preuve sociale 21
Affordability 58.7

Caractéristiques techniques

Fiche technique complète

Chipset

GPU Chipset GeForce RTX 3060
Brand NVIDIA
Architecture Ampere
Class consumer
Process 8

Memory

VRAM 12 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 192
Bandwidth 240
ECC No

Compute

CUDA Cores 3584
Tensor Cores 112
RT Cores 28
Base Clock 1320
Boost Clock 1807
FP16 TFLOPS 12.74
FP32 TFLOPS 12.74

Performance

PassMark G3D 16890
GPU Compute 8039

Power & Cooling

TDP 170
Recommended PSU 550
Power Connectors 1 x 8-pin
Cooler Dual Fan
Fans 2

Connectivity

Interface PCI Express 4.0
DisplayPort 3
HDMI 1
Max Displays 4
Max Resolution 7680 x 4320

Physical

Length 235
Slot Width 2
Form Factor Full Height
Weight 1.0 kg / 2.3 lbs

Features

Ray Tracing Yes
Upscaling DLSS
AV1 Encode Yes
VR Ready Yes
DirectX 12 Ultimate
RGB No

Face à la concurrence

Spec MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ventus 2X OC ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD ZOTAC SOLID OC White Edition ZT-B50900Q-10P PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O Sapphire PULSE 11322-02-20G
Chipset GeForce RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5080 GeForce RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5080 Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Vram 12GB GDDR6 32GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 32GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 24GB GDDR6
Boost Clock Mhz 1807 2407 2730 2422 2620 2525
Tdp W 170 575 360 575 360 370
Memory Bus Bits 192 512 256 512 256 384
Ray Tracing true true true true true true
GPU Class consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produit AIRtVramRasterComputeFeatureThermalUser SentimentEfficiencyConnectivityPreuve socialeAffordability
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ventus 2X OC 51.345.552.239.334.79056.645.56170.72158.7
ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare 96.79097.498.697.496.472.886.526.899.299.13.4
Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD Compare 8595.288.594.193.196.491.572.358.994.188.915.9
ZOTAC SOLID OC White Edition ZT-B50900Q-10P Compare 96.990.497.498.697.796.491.596.226.894.1612.2
PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O Compare 8597.588.594.193.196.491.545.558.994.182.617.6
Sapphire PULSE 11322-02-20G Compare 94.796.291.583.695.496.472.872.343.386.278.418.5

Prix

Rapport qualité-prix

À partir de 73 980 JPY 1 offre chez 1 marchand
Amazon 1 offre À partir de 73 980 JPY

Price History

72 000 JPY 74 000 JPY 76 000 JPY 78 000 JPY 80 000 JPY 82 000 JPY 7 juin9 nov. 73 980 JPY

Scores par usage

Global (55.1)AI/LLM (40.8)Budget (69.9)Gaming 4k (48.6)Ray Tracing (55.9)Workstation (45.8)Gaming 1080p (57.9)Gaming 1440p (55.6)Content Creation (49)

Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.

Autres configurations2

Produits similaires