Price drop 15%

AMD Radeon R7 350 4GB GDDR5

★★★★☆ 4.1 (69)

Its defining feature is the six native HDMI 1.4a outputs, enabling six independent displays from a single 180mm card powered entirely through the PCIe slot with a 55W TDP. The 4GB of GDDR5 memory and passive cooling design ensure reliable, low-maintenance operation for static digital signage and monitoring walls. This card is best for financial traders, security operators, and advertising display managers who need to drive multi-screen 1080p arrays without external power connectors.

GPU Radeon R7 350
VRAM 4GB GDDR5
Boost Clock 800 MHz
TDP 55 W
Memory Bus 128 bit
Class consumer
AMD Radeon R7 350 4GB GDDR5 gpu
18 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Strong affordability (87th percentile) 87th
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile) 68th
  • Strong connectivity (65th percentile) 65th

Cons

  • Below average rt (2nd percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (2nd percentile)
  • Below average raster (2nd percentile)
  • Below average thermal (7th percentile)

What owners think

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has cooled since launch
72/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 10 sources · Jun 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '25: 4.5★ · 2 reviewsQ4 '25: 4.3★ · 4 reviewsQ1 '26: 3.7★ · 3 reviews1243Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews
  1. Q1 202667/1003.7★3 reviews

    Mixed reviews: one user reports flawless multi-monitor performance, while another experienced a failure after 31 days.

    • Works well with multiple monitors for productivity tasks.
    • Card failed after 31 days, just past return window.
    • Easy setup with 4K HDMI cables and driver update.
    • No response from seller after reporting defect.
  2. Q4 202585/1004.3★4 reviews

    Buyers in Q4 2025 found the card easy to install and reliable for multi-monitor productivity, though some noted cramped port spacing and tricky monitor arrangement.

    • Easy installation and plug-and-play experience for multi-monitor setups.
    • Port spacing too tight for some 4K cables, requiring thinner plugs or filing.
    • Monitor sequencing setup via Windows was unintuitive and time-consuming.
    • One review flagged the brand as potentially unbranded or fake based on online search.

Based on 10 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Performance Percentiles

AI 11.4
Rt 1.9
Vram 12.9
Raster 2
Feature 11.2
Thermal 6.6
User Sentiment 27.3
Efficiency 2
Connectivity 65.3
Social Proof 67.9
Affordability 86.5

Specifications

Full Specifications

Chipset

GPU Chipset Radeon R7 350
Brand AMD
Class consumer
Process 28

Memory

VRAM 4 GB
Memory Type GDDR5
Memory Bus 128

Compute

Base Clock 800
Boost Clock 800

Power & Cooling

TDP 55
Recommended PSU 300
Power Connectors None

Connectivity

Interface PCI Express 3.0 x16
HDMI 6
Max Displays 6

Physical

Length 180
Form Factor Full Height
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs

Features

DirectX 12

vs Competition

Spec AMD Radeon R7 350 ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O ZOTAC AMP Extreme INFINITY ZT-B50900B-10P
Chipset Radeon R7 350 GeForce RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5080 GeForce RTX 5090
Vram 4GB GDDR5 32GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 32GB GDDR7
Boost Clock Mhz 800 2407 2588 2482 2620 2467
Tdp W 55 575 300 300 360 600
Memory Bus Bits 128 512 256 256 256 512
Ray Tracing - true true true true true
GPU Class consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AIRtVramRasterFeatureThermalUser SentimentEfficiencyConnectivitySocial ProofAffordability
AMD Radeon R7 350 11.41.912.9211.26.627.3265.367.986.5
ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare 96.990.197.698.796.272.485.924.699.399.13.5
Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD Compare 79.288.385.688.896.291.585.972.99495.521.9
MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare 79.292.285.688.896.291.580.272.99488.821.1
PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O Compare 85.297.588.794.296.291.544.957.89482.618.1
ZOTAC AMP Extreme INFINITY ZT-B50900B-10P Compare 97.390.197.698.796.291.585.921.49460.92.4

Price

Value & Pricing

From ¥31,471 1 offer across 1 retailer
Amazon 1 offer From ¥31,471

Price History

¥30,000 ¥32,000 ¥34,000 ¥36,000 ¥38,000 ¥40,000 ¥42,000 Jun 21Nov 13 ¥31,471

Usage Scores

Overall (17.6)AI/LLM (9.2)Budget (59.4)Gaming 4k (8.1)Ray Tracing (8.1)Workstation (19)Gaming 1080p (11.7)Gaming 1440p (9.6)Content Creation (19.2)
  • Overall17.6
  • AI/LLM9.2
  • Budget59.4
  • Gaming 4k8.1
  • Ray Tracing8.1
  • Workstation19
  • Gaming 1080p11.7
  • Gaming 1440p9.6
  • Content Creation19.2

A full written review is coming soon. The specs, scores, prices and charts above are always up to date.

Similar Products