AMD Radeon R7 350 4GB GDDR5

★★★★☆ 4.1 (69)

Its defining feature is the six native HDMI 1.4a outputs, enabling six independent displays from a single 180mm card powered entirely through the PCIe slot with a 55W TDP. The 4GB of GDDR5 memory and passive cooling design ensure reliable, low-maintenance operation for static digital signage and monitoring walls. This card is best for financial traders, security operators, and advertising display managers who need to drive multi-screen 1080p arrays without external power connectors.

GPU Radeon R7 350
VRAM 4GB GDDR5
Boost Clock 800 MHz
TDP 55 W
Memory Bus 128 bit
Class consumer
AMD Radeon R7 350 4GB GDDR5 gpu
18 ओवरऑल स्कोर

अभी किसी विक्रेता की मौजूदा कीमत नहीं है

इनमें भी उपलब्ध:

एक नज़र में

फायदे और नुकसान

खूबियाँ

  • Strong affordability (87th percentile) 87th
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile) 68th
  • Strong connectivity (65th percentile) 65th

कमियाँ

  • Below average rt (2nd percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (2nd percentile)
  • Below average raster (2nd percentile)
  • Below average thermal (7th percentile)

मालिकों की राय

मालिकों की राय समय के साथ कैसे बदली

विशेष

ग्राहकों ने वास्तव में अपनी समीक्षाएँ कब लिखीं, इसके आधार पर - ताकि आप देख सकें कि शुरुआती तारीफ़ टिकी या नहीं।

लॉन्च के बाद से मालिकों की राय ठंडी पड़ी है
72/100हमारा AI भावना विश्लेषणमध्यम विश्वसनीयता · 10 स्रोत · जून 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 समीक्षाQ3 '25: 4.5★ · 2 समीक्षाएँQ4 '25: 4.3★ · 4 समीक्षाएँQ1 '26: 3.7★ · 3 समीक्षाएँ1243Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26
औसत रेटिंगसंतुष्ट (4-5★)असंतुष्ट (1-2★)बार की ऊँचाई = समीक्षाओं की संख्या
  1. Q1 202667/1003.7★3 समीक्षाएँ

    Mixed reviews: one user reports flawless multi-monitor performance, while another experienced a failure after 31 days.

    • Works well with multiple monitors for productivity tasks.
    • Card failed after 31 days, just past return window.
    • Easy setup with 4K HDMI cables and driver update.
    • No response from seller after reporting defect.
  2. Q4 202585/1004.3★4 समीक्षाएँ

    Buyers in Q4 2025 found the card easy to install and reliable for multi-monitor productivity, though some noted cramped port spacing and tricky monitor arrangement.

    • Easy installation and plug-and-play experience for multi-monitor setups.
    • Port spacing too tight for some 4K cables, requiring thinner plugs or filing.
    • Monitor sequencing setup via Windows was unintuitive and time-consuming.
    • One review flagged the brand as potentially unbranded or fake based on online search.

10 तिथि-युक्त ग्राहक समीक्षाओं पर आधारित, कैलेंडर तिमाही के अनुसार समूहित। अवधि-वार विश्लेषण अंग्रेज़ी में है।

प्रमाण

प्रदर्शन

प्रदर्शन प्रतिशतक

AI 11.4
Rt 1.9
Vram 12.9
Raster 2
Feature 11.2
Thermal 6.6
User Sentiment 27.3
Efficiency 2
Connectivity 65.3
सामाजिक प्रमाण 67.9
Affordability 86.5

तकनीकी विशेषताएं

पूर्ण विनिर्देश

Chipset

GPU Chipset Radeon R7 350
Brand AMD
Class consumer
Process 28

Memory

VRAM 4 GB
Memory Type GDDR5
Memory Bus 128

Compute

Base Clock 800
Boost Clock 800

Power & Cooling

TDP 55
Recommended PSU 300
Power Connectors None

Connectivity

Interface PCI Express 3.0 x16
HDMI 6
Max Displays 6

Physical

Length 180
Form Factor Full Height
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs

Features

DirectX 12

प्रतिस्पर्धियों से तुलना

Spec AMD Radeon R7 350 ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G
Chipset Radeon R7 350 GeForce RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5080 Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Vram 4GB GDDR5 32GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 24GB GDDR6
Boost Clock Mhz 800 2407 2588 2482 2730 2680
Tdp W 55 575 300 300 360 339
Memory Bus Bits 128 512 256 256 256 384
Ray Tracing - true true true true true
GPU Class consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
उत्पाद AIRtVramRasterFeatureThermalUser SentimentEfficiencyConnectivityसामाजिक प्रमाणAffordability
AMD Radeon R7 350 11.41.912.9211.26.627.3265.367.986.5
ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare 96.990.197.698.796.272.485.924.699.399.13.5
Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD Compare 79.288.385.688.896.291.585.972.99495.521.9
MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare 79.292.285.688.896.291.580.272.99488.821.1
ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare 85.297.588.794.296.291.599.457.89499.119.2
Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare 94.996.291.783.983.991.585.952.798.778.417.6

उपयोग के अनुसार स्कोर

कुल (17.6)AI/LLM (9.2)Budget (59.4)Gaming 4k (8.1)Ray Tracing (8.1)Workstation (19)Gaming 1080p (11.7)Gaming 1440p (9.6)Content Creation (19.2)
  • कुल17.6
  • AI/LLM9.2
  • Budget59.4
  • Gaming 4k8.1
  • Ray Tracing8.1
  • Workstation19
  • Gaming 1080p11.7
  • Gaming 1440p9.6
  • Content Creation19.2

पूरी समीक्षा जल्द ही आ रही है। ऊपर दिए गए स्पेसिफिकेशन, स्कोर, कीमतें और चार्ट हमेशा अपडेट रहते हैं।

समान उत्पाद