AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+

★★★★☆ 3.7 (162)

The FX-9590 pushes an 8-core Vishera design to a 5.0GHz boost clock on the aging AM3+ socket, but its 220W TDP demands liquid cooling and a high-end motherboard. Its unlocked multiplier and 8MB of L3 cache offer overclocking headroom for legacy DDR3 systems, though efficiency scores just 29/100. This CPU suits budget builders reviving old AM3+ rigs for basic multithreaded tasks, not modern gaming or power-conscious users.

Cores 8
Threads 8
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
L3 Cache 8 MB
TDP 220 W
Socket AM3+
Integrated Graphics On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+ cpu
48 التقييم العام

لا يوجد سعر حالي لدى المتاجر

متوفر أيضًا في:

لمحة سريعة

The 30-Second Version

The FX-9590 was the first 5GHz consumer CPU, and it still holds that title on AM3+. But the 220W TDP and mediocre single-thread performance make it a tough buy in 2024. Only worth it if you're stuck on AM3+ and find a cheap one.

Pros & Cons

الإيجابيات

  • First consumer 5GHz boost clock, still a fun bragging right 84th
  • 8 cores and 8 threads for older multi-threaded workloads 73rd
  • Unlocked multiplier for overclocking headroom
  • Works on existing AM3+ boards with a BIOS update

السلبيات

  • 220W TDP is absurd, you'll need beefy cooling
  • Single-thread performance is mediocre by today's standards
  • DDR3 memory only, no upgrade path
  • Efficiency score of 31.3 is a real letdown

آراء المالكين

The Word on the Street

3.7/5 (162 reviews)
👍 Several owners upgrading from older FX chips say it's a noticeable step up, especially with a good liquid cooler.
👎 A common complaint is random freezing and lockups, even under light loads, which some blame on the high power draw.
🤔 Some buyers appreciate the raw clock speed but warn that you need a high-end motherboard and cooling to keep it stable.

كيف تغيّر رأي المالكين بمرور الوقت

حصري

استنادًا إلى وقت كتابة العملاء لتقييماتهم فعليًا - لترى ما إذا كان الثناء المبكر قد استمر.

تحسّن رأي المالكين بمرور الوقت
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '15: 1.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ2 '15: 5.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ3 '15: 1.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ4 '15: 4.5★ · 2 مراجعاتQ1 '16: 5.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ2 '16: 3.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ4 '16: 5.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ2 '18: 5.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ1 '19: 5.0★ · 1 مراجعةQ2 '19: 5.0★ · 1 مراجعة1112111111Q1 '15Q2 '15Q3 '15Q4 '15Q1 '16Q2 '16Q4 '16Q2 '18Q1 '19Q2 '19
متوسط التقييمراضون (4-5★)غير راضين (1-2★)ارتفاع العمود = عدد المراجعات

استنادًا إلى 11 مراجعة عملاء مؤرخة، مجمّعة حسب الربع التقويمي. تحليل الفترات باللغة الإنجليزية.

الأدلة

Performance

The 5GHz boost clock is the headline, and it does deliver in bursts. PassMark shows 6834 multi and 1807 single. That single-thread number is roughly on par with budget chips from a decade ago, which is exactly what this is. The 8MB of L3 cache helps in some workloads, but the 32nm Vishera architecture is ancient. Multi-thread performance lands at the 47th percentile, so it's fine for older games and basic productivity, but anything modern will choke. And that 220W TDP means you need serious cooling. Like, liquid cooling or a very patient air cooler.

Performance Percentiles

AI 44.5
Feature 83.6
Platform 46.1
Efficiency 32.9
Multi Thread 46.8
التقييم الاجتماعي 72.8
Affordability 28.3
Single Thread 45.7

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand AMD
Series FX
Model FX-9590
Codename Vishera
Class desktop
Process 32

Cores & Clocks

Cores 8
P-cores 8
Threads 8
Base Clock 4700
Boost Clock 5000

Cache

L2 Cache 8
L3 Cache 8 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 6834
PassMark Single 1807

Memory

Memory Type DDR3
Max Speed 1866
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket AM3+
TDP 220
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

vs Competition

Against something like the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, this thing is a fossil. The 285K runs circles around it in every metric, but it also costs way more and requires a new motherboard and DDR5. The Phenom II X6 is an older AMD chip that's even slower, so the FX-9590 at least beats that. The be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 is a cooler, not a CPU, so that's not a fair fight. If you're comparing to anything modern, the FX-9590 loses. If you're comparing to other AM3+ chips, it's the king of a dead socket.

Spec AMD FX 9590 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 SMC EPYC 9555P D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21
Cores 8 24 32 64 18 16
Threads 8 24 64 128 36 32
Boost Clock Mhz 5000 5700 3500 4400 4400 3900
L3 Cache Mb 8 36 256 256 24.75 37.5
Tdp W 220 125 200 360 165 195
Socket AM3+ LGA 1851 Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) AMD Socket SP5 LGA2066 LGA 4677
Integrated Graphics On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) Intel Graphics No - - No
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
المنتج AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti Threadالتقييم الاجتماعيAffordabilitySingle Thread
AMD FX 9590 44.583.646.132.946.872.828.345.7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare 96.299.995.99796.290.418.599.9
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare 99.190.976.497.499.1088.488.7
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.377.196.888.999.400.485.2
D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Compare 97.362.682.599.499.872.47.795.7
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 Compare 91.877.190.778.189.402.779.7

السعر

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place. In the US you can find it for $222, but in Europe it ranges from EUR 439 to EUR 723 depending on the vendor. That's a massive spread. If you're in Europe, shop around because the cheapest listing is nearly EUR 300 less than the most expensive. Honestly, even at $222 this is a tough sell. You're paying collector prices for a CPU that gets smoked by a modern $100 chip. The only reason to buy this is if you're stuck on AM3+ and refuse to upgrade your whole platform.

اقرأ المزيد

Overview

The AMD FX-9590 is a weird piece of history. It was the first consumer CPU to hit 5GHz out of the box, which sounds cool until you see the 220W TDP. That's space heater territory. Eight cores, 4.7GHz base, 5.0GHz boost, and a socket that's been dead for years. This thing is a relic, and it acts like one.

Our database puts it at 47.9 out of 100 overall. The multi-thread score is middle of the pack, single-thread is about average, and efficiency is a real letdown at 31.3. If you're on AM3+ and desperate for an upgrade, this is the top of that particular hill. But it's a short hill.

Common Questions

Q: Do I need a special motherboard for the FX-9590?

Yes. It requires an AM3+ board with a BIOS update and beefy VRMs. Many cheaper AM3+ boards can't handle the 220W power draw and will throttle or crash.

Q: What kind of cooler do I need?

At minimum a high-end air cooler, but realistically a 240mm or larger liquid cooler. The 220W TDP means anything less will thermal throttle under load.

Q: Is the FX-9590 good for gaming in 2024?

Only for older or less demanding titles. The single-thread score of 1807 in PassMark is roughly on par with budget chips from a decade ago, so modern games will struggle.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you're building a new PC or upgrading from anything made in the last five years. A modern budget CPU will beat it in every way while using a fraction of the power. Also skip it if you don't already own a high-end AM3+ board and a serious cooler, because the 220W TDP will cause instability on weaker hardware.

Verdict

Buy this if you have an AM3+ board, a beefy cooler, and a nostalgic streak. It's the fastest chip that socket ever saw, and hitting 5GHz is still a fun party trick. But for anyone building a new system or upgrading from something even remotely modern, this is a hard pass. The performance per watt is terrible, and the platform is a dead end.

Usage Scores

الإجمالي (48)AI/LLM (41.6)Budget (50.5)الألعاب (46.6)Server (38.7)Efficiency (31.4)Productivity (49.7)

تكوينات أخرى1

منتجات مشابهة