AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+
The FX-9590 pushes an 8-core Vishera design to a 5.0GHz boost clock on the aging AM3+ socket, but its 220W TDP demands liquid cooling and a high-end motherboard. Its unlocked multiplier and 8MB of L3 cache offer overclocking headroom for legacy DDR3 systems, though efficiency scores just 29/100. This CPU suits budget builders reviving old AM3+ rigs for basic multithreaded tasks, not modern gaming or power-conscious users.
Resumen
The 30-Second Version
The FX-9590 was the first 5GHz consumer CPU, and it still holds that title on AM3+. But the 220W TDP and mediocre single-thread performance make it a tough buy in 2024. Only worth it if you're stuck on AM3+ and find a cheap one.
Pros & Cons
Ventajas
- First consumer 5GHz boost clock, still a fun bragging right 84th
- 8 cores and 8 threads for older multi-threaded workloads 73rd
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking headroom
- Works on existing AM3+ boards with a BIOS update
Desventajas
- 220W TDP is absurd, you'll need beefy cooling
- Single-thread performance is mediocre by today's standards
- DDR3 memory only, no upgrade path
- Efficiency score of 31.3 is a real letdown
Opinión de los propietarios
The Word on the Street
Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo
ExclusivaSegún cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.
Basado en 11 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.
Las pruebas
Performance
The 5GHz boost clock is the headline, and it does deliver in bursts. PassMark shows 6834 multi and 1807 single. That single-thread number is roughly on par with budget chips from a decade ago, which is exactly what this is. The 8MB of L3 cache helps in some workloads, but the 32nm Vishera architecture is ancient. Multi-thread performance lands at the 47th percentile, so it's fine for older games and basic productivity, but anything modern will choke. And that 220W TDP means you need serious cooling. Like, liquid cooling or a very patient air cooler.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | FX |
| Model | FX-9590 |
| Codename | Vishera |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 32 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 8 |
| P-cores | 8 |
| Threads | 8 |
| Base Clock | 4700 |
| Boost Clock | 5000 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 8 |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 6834 |
| PassMark Single | 1807 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR3 |
| Max Speed | 1866 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | AM3+ |
| TDP | 220 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
vs Competition
Against something like the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, this thing is a fossil. The 285K runs circles around it in every metric, but it also costs way more and requires a new motherboard and DDR5. The Phenom II X6 is an older AMD chip that's even slower, so the FX-9590 at least beats that. The be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 is a cooler, not a CPU, so that's not a fair fight. If you're comparing to anything modern, the FX-9590 loses. If you're comparing to other AM3+ chips, it's the king of a dead socket.
| Spec | AMD FX 9590 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | G.Skill Trident Z Neo | Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 24 | 16 | - | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 | 32 | - | 12 | 12 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 5000 | 5700 | 4400 | - | 4200 | 4000 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 8 | 36 | 22 | - | 32 | 8 |
| Tdp W | 220 | 125 | 165 | - | 65 | 15 |
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA 1851 | LGA 2066 | - | AMD Socket AM4 | AM4 |
| Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel Graphics | - | - | - | AMD Integrated Graphics |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Valoración social | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD FX 9590 | 44.5 | 83.6 | 46.1 | 32.9 | 46.8 | 72.8 | 28.2 | 45.7 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.9 | 95.9 | 97 | 96.2 | 90.4 | 18.4 | 99.9 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X Compare | 88.6 | 62.6 | 81.4 | 73.8 | 84.2 | 70.6 | 17.5 | 73 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.2 | 20.4 | 17.9 | 65.7 | 96.9 | 0 | 6.5 | 98.2 |
| G.Skill Trident Z Neo Compare | 72 | 87.3 | 78.4 | 83.4 | 71.7 | 0 | 20.8 | 71.6 |
| Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: Compare | 62.4 | 54.9 | 57.2 | 99.2 | 62.6 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 66.1 |
Precio
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place. In the US you can find it for $222, but in Europe it ranges from EUR 439 to EUR 723 depending on the vendor. That's a massive spread. If you're in Europe, shop around because the cheapest listing is nearly EUR 300 less than the most expensive. Honestly, even at $222 this is a tough sell. You're paying collector prices for a CPU that gets smoked by a modern $100 chip. The only reason to buy this is if you're stuck on AM3+ and refuse to upgrade your whole platform.
Amazon 1 oferta Desde 353 GBP
Seguimos los precios de este producto desde el 5 nov 2026. El gráfico aparecerá cuando tengamos más datos.
Leer más
Overview
The AMD FX-9590 is a weird piece of history. It was the first consumer CPU to hit 5GHz out of the box, which sounds cool until you see the 220W TDP. That's space heater territory. Eight cores, 4.7GHz base, 5.0GHz boost, and a socket that's been dead for years. This thing is a relic, and it acts like one.
Our database puts it at 47.9 out of 100 overall. The multi-thread score is middle of the pack, single-thread is about average, and efficiency is a real letdown at 31.3. If you're on AM3+ and desperate for an upgrade, this is the top of that particular hill. But it's a short hill.
Common Questions
Q: Do I need a special motherboard for the FX-9590?
Yes. It requires an AM3+ board with a BIOS update and beefy VRMs. Many cheaper AM3+ boards can't handle the 220W power draw and will throttle or crash.
Q: What kind of cooler do I need?
At minimum a high-end air cooler, but realistically a 240mm or larger liquid cooler. The 220W TDP means anything less will thermal throttle under load.
Q: Is the FX-9590 good for gaming in 2024?
Only for older or less demanding titles. The single-thread score of 1807 in PassMark is roughly on par with budget chips from a decade ago, so modern games will struggle.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're building a new PC or upgrading from anything made in the last five years. A modern budget CPU will beat it in every way while using a fraction of the power. Also skip it if you don't already own a high-end AM3+ board and a serious cooler, because the 220W TDP will cause instability on weaker hardware.
Verdict
Buy this if you have an AM3+ board, a beefy cooler, and a nostalgic streak. It's the fastest chip that socket ever saw, and hitting 5GHz is still a fun party trick. But for anyone building a new system or upgrading from something even remotely modern, this is a hard pass. The performance per watt is terrible, and the platform is a dead end.