Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
Die Air Sphere Coating und der 4-Stufen-Bildstabilisator liefern kontrastreiche, verwacklungsfreie Aufnahmen selbst bei Gegenlicht und aus der Hand. Der rotationsbasierte Zoomring mit einstellbarem Drehmoment ermöglicht eine präzise Bildkomposition und exzellente Balance, während die wetterfeste Abdichtung Langlebigkeit bei härtesten Bedingungen garantiert. Dieses 1640g schwere Supertelezoom ist die erste Wahl für Wildlife- und Sportfotografen, die ein robustes Canon EF-Objektiv mit 0,31-facher Vergrößerung benötigen.
Überblick
Das Wichtigste in 30 Sekunden
Das Objektiv liefert weiterhin gute Bilder, aber der Preisanstieg um rund 18 Prozent und die auf 48 Punkte abgerutschte Bewertung machen es schwer, eine Kaufempfehlung auszusprechen. Neue Konkurrenten wie das Sigma 16-300mm oder das Tamron 18-300mm bieten mehr Flexibilität und oft das bessere Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis.
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Solide optische Grundleistung 98th
- Robuste Verarbeitung 94th
Nachteile
- Deutlicher Preisanstieg von rund 18 Prozent
- Gesamtbewertung auf 48 Punkte abgerutscht
- Starke neue Konkurrenz mit besserem Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Keine Nutzerstimmungs-Analyse mehr verfügbar
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
- Q1 202688/100
Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and image stabilization, especially for birding. A few note grey market concerns and mixed value opinions.
- Excellent image quality, sharpness, and color reproduction across many reviews.
- Fast and quiet autofocus, effective image stabilization for handheld use.
- Some buyers mention grey market packaging without USA warranty card.
- One reviewer notes image quality not much better than cheaper EF-S 55-250.
- Q3 202567/100
Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, fast focus, and build quality, but note its weight and one review's rating contradicts positive text.
- Sharp image quality and fast autofocus performance, even with extender.
- Excellent build quality, described as 'built like a tank' and top tier.
- Heavy weight noted as a drawback, but acceptable for handheld use.
- One verified review gave 0 stars despite positive text, suggesting possible rating error.
- Q2 202567/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, ease of use, and fast image quality, though two zero-star ratings suggest possible confusion or errors.
- Lens is sharp and produces high-quality images.
- Easy to use, even for non-professionals.
- Fast autofocus and image capture.
- Two zero-star ratings despite positive text, indicating potential rating errors.
- Q1 202495/100
Buyers praise the lens for excellent build quality, sharp images, fast autofocus, and versatile close-focus capability. It is considered a rugged, high-performance telephoto for wildlife and general use.
- Excellent build quality with rugged metal body and smooth zoom ring.
- Razor sharp, high contrast images at all focal lengths.
- Fast autofocus and effective image stabilization for moving subjects.
- Exceptional close focus distance (3 ft) enables macro-like and portrait shots.
- Q3 2022100/100
Buyers praised this lens as a versatile walk-around option with high contrast, resolution, and tolerable weight, plus effective telephoto and close-up capabilities.
- Versatile walk-around lens covering wide to telephoto with high contrast and resolution.
- Effective telephoto reach for capturing distant subjects clearly and larger.
- Good close-up performance, not just telephoto; useful for grab shots.
- Fast-moving subject tracking with reliable autofocus lock in most instances.
- Q2 2022100/100
Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, fast focus, and great value, noting significant price increases post-pandemic.
- Excellent image sharpness and fast autofocus performance.
- Great value and satisfaction with purchase price and deals.
- Lens is a favorite go-to piece of equipment for wildlife.
- Price has increased dramatically post-pandemic, but buyers are glad they bought early.
- Q4 2021100/100
Buyers praise this lens as the best in its range for sharpness and speed, ideal for sports and wildlife photography.
- Superior sharpness and speed compared to competitors like Sigma and Tamron.
- Excellent for sports, action, and wildlife photography.
- High image quality allows cropping without loss.
- Worth the cost; users do not regret the purchase.
- Q3 2021100/100
Buyers praised the lens for wildlife photography, sharpness, and fast shipping, but noted autofocus incompatibility with extenders.
- Great for bird and wildlife photography.
- Sharp image quality.
- Fast shipping and good seller experience.
- Autofocus not usable with an extender.
- Q2 2021100/100
Buyers praise the lens as sharp, fast, and ideal for wildlife photography. Some note the tripod collar has a fragile plastic part.
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality throughout the zoom range.
- Fast autofocus and effective image stabilization for wildlife.
- Heavy lens; tripod or monopod recommended for extended use.
- Tripod collar has a plastic piece that can break, though lens function unaffected.
- Q1 202191/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, fast focus, and image quality, with minor complaints about weight and tripod foot issues.
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality, especially at 400mm.
- Fast and precise autofocus, great for motion and wildlife shots.
- Weight is a common concern but expected for this type of lens.
- Tripod foot issues noted by one user, though otherwise an upgrade.
- Q4 202092/100
Buyers praise this lens for outstanding sharpness, reach, and versatility in wildlife and bird photography. A few note it is heavy and expensive, with one reporting a less sharp copy.
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality, often described as 'tack sharp' or 'wicked sharp'.
- Excellent reach and versatility, especially with teleconverters and on APS-C cameras.
- Heavy and large, but most find it manageable for the performance.
- One copy was not sharp, leading to a trade; some find it overpriced.
- Q3 2020100/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and smooth zoom, ideal for wildlife photography.
- Image quality is crisp and clean.
- Autofocus is fast and reliable.
- Stabilizer settings are effective.
- Zoom movement is smooth.
- Q2 202086/100
Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and versatility for sports and wildlife. One reviewer notes a recent price increase reduces value.
- Sharp glass and fast autofocus at all focal lengths.
- Excellent for sports, wildlife, and bird photography.
- Image stabilization allows handheld use in good light.
- Price increase of $400 within a week reduces value.
- Q1 202094/100
Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent image quality, especially for wildlife. Some note the weight and one warns against use with Sony mirrorless.
- Sharpness and image quality are outstanding, even with a teleconverter.
- Autofocus is fast and reliable, especially on Canon DSLRs like the 7D Mark II.
- Lens is heavy; some find it tiring for handheld use, but others adapt.
- Not recommended for Sony mirrorless cameras due to poor adapter performance.
- Q4 201989/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and image stabilization, ideal for wildlife and travel. A few noted quality control issues and dust ingress.
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality, often compared to L-series lenses.
- Fast and accurate autofocus, effective image stabilization for handheld shots.
- Some copies had softness at 400mm, but exchange resolved it; quality control varies.
- Zoom mechanism can absorb sand/dust on beaches, difficult to clean.
Basierend auf 110 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Optics
| Type | Telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 100 |
| Focal Length Max | 400 |
| Elements | 21 |
| Groups | 16 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4 |
| ED Elements | 1 |
| Coating | Air Sphere Coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/100 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-5.6 |
| Constant | No |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 1.6 kg / 3.6 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 77 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | USM |
| Stabilization | Yes |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 980 |
| Max Magnification | 0.31x |
Im Vergleich
Im direkten Vergleich hat sich das Feld deutlich verschärft. Das Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS deckt einen noch größeren Brennweitenbereich ab und ist oft günstiger zu haben. Das Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD punktet mit schnellem Autofokus und durchgehend guter Schärfe. Wer in ein spiegelloses Vollformat-System investiert, sollte einen Blick auf das Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR werfen, das trotz der langsamen Blende eine enorme Reichweite bietet. Für Micro-Four-Thirds-Nutzer ist das Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 50-200mm eine hochwertige, wenn auch weniger flexible Alternative. Selbst das betagte Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM mischt dank seines günstigen Gebrauchtpreises noch mit. Unser getestetes Objektiv fällt in dieser Runde vor allem durch den hohen Preis und die mittlerweile durchschnittliche Bewertung zurück.
| Spec | Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD | Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 100-400mm | 28-300mm | 18-50mm | 17-28mm | 12-35mm | 18-135mm |
| Max Aperture | f/100 | f/4 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Canon EF | Sony E | Sony E | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Stabilization | true | true | false | false | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 1640 | 590 | 290 | 450 | 306 | 326 |
| AF Type | USM | VXD linear motor | stepping motor | Stepping Motor | Autofocus | Linear motor |
| Lens Type | telephoto | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Nutzerresonanz | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon L EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM | 94.2 | 0.8 | 16.3 | 33.6 | 98 | 0.6 | 80.9 | 88.2 | 85.3 | 93.3 |
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare | 98 | 78 | 65.2 | 85.8 | 96.7 | 66.1 | 91.2 | 97.7 | 55.5 | 82.4 |
| Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Compare | 86.9 | 81.9 | 86.1 | 91.7 | 82.2 | 84.1 | 80.9 | 78.6 | 89.7 | 36.8 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare | 86.9 | 87.1 | 75.2 | 85.8 | 88.2 | 84.1 | 91.2 | 68 | 69.4 | 36.8 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.9 | 81.9 | 85.4 | 51 | 86.5 | 84.1 | 63.7 | 80.6 | 85.3 | 96.9 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 98 | 75.5 | 72.5 | 40.3 | 78.5 | 77.5 | 44.7 | 95.8 | 89.7 | 82.4 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Das Preisschild ist der große Knackpunkt. Früher bekam man dieses Objektiv für rund 1460 Euro, was angesichts der optischen Leistung ein echtes Schnäppchen war. Jetzt liegt der Einstiegspreis bei etwa 1730 Euro und die Spanne reicht bis 2320 Euro. Das ist ein Sprung von rund 18 Prozent nach oben. Für diesen Aufpreis bekommt man keine verbesserte Optik oder neue Features, sondern schlicht das gleiche Glas. Wer zum Vollpreis kauft, muss die gebotene Bildqualität schon sehr dringend brauchen, um den Aufschlag zu rechtfertigen. Im aktuellen Marktumfeld wirkt das nicht mehr konkurrenzfähig.
Amazon.co.uk 1 Angebot Ab 1.889 £
Price History
Mehr erfahren
Fazit
Die optische Leistung ist nach wie vor solide, aber der deutliche Preisanstieg und die stark gesunkene Gesamtbewertung werfen einen langen Schatten. Mit einer Punktzahl von 48 von 100 und neuen, teils günstigeren Alternativen im Top-Segment ist dieses Objektiv nicht mehr die klare Empfehlung, die es einmal war. Wer bereits eines besitzt, kann zufrieden weiternutzen. Für Neukäufer gibt es derzeit schlicht bessere Optionen, die mehr fürs Geld bieten.