Nieuw

fanxiang S501 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

★★★★☆ 4.4 (995)
Capacity 512GB
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Read Speed 2,150 MB/s
NAND TLC
Endurance 320 TBW
fanxiang S501 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 ssd
50 Totaalscore

Geen actuele winkelprijs

Ook beschikbaar in:

Overzicht

The 30-Second Version

The fanxiang S501 is a budget NVMe drive that punches above its weight on value. TLC NAND and 320 TBW endurance beat most drives at this price, and users love the easy installation and snappy everyday performance. Sequential speeds are middle of the pack at 2,150/1,600 MB/s, but that's fine for boot drives and older systems. Quality control is the main concern, with a few verified reports of dead drives out of the box. If you need cheap, reliable storage for an upgrade or repair, this is a solid pick.

Pros & Cons

Pluspunten

  • TLC NAND at a budget price, better endurance than QLC alternatives 78th
  • 320 TBW endurance rating beats most drives in this price range 69th
  • Easy installation, users report Windows recognizes it immediately
  • Solid random performance for snappy everyday use
  • Great value, affordability ranks in the 78th percentile

Minpunten

  • Sequential speeds are middle of the pack at 2,150/1,600 MB/s
  • Quality control concerns, at least one verified buyer got a dead drive
  • 512GB capacity is on the small side for modern game libraries
  • No PS5 support, so console users need to look elsewhere
  • Feature set is basic, no DRAM cache or fancy extras

Wat eigenaren vinden

The Word on the Street

4.4/5 (995 reviews)
👍 A recurring theme is that buyers are impressed with the speed for the price, with multiple owners describing it as the best budget SSD they've used.
👍 Installation is consistently described as painless, with several users noting that Windows recognized the drive immediately without any fiddling.
👍 The value proposition resonates strongly, with many reviewers emphasizing that the performance-to-price ratio is hard to beat.
🤔 Reliability is a point of contention, as most owners report trouble-free operation but a few have experienced failures, including one verified buyer whose drive died immediately.

Hoe de mening van eigenaren in de loop van de tijd veranderde

Exclusief

Op basis van wanneer klanten hun reviews daadwerkelijk schreven - zo zie je of de eerste lof standhield.

De mening van eigenaren is in de loop van de tijd verbeterd
78/100Onze AI-sentimentanalysegemiddelde betrouwbaarheid · 10 bronnen · nov 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '22: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '23: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '23: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '25: 1.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 4 reviews1111114Q4 '22Q2 '23Q3 '23Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26
Gem. beoordelingTevreden (4-5★)Ontevreden (1-2★)Balkhoogte = aantal reviews

Gebaseerd op 10 gedateerde klantreviews, gegroepeerd per kalenderkwartaal. Analyse per periode is in het Engels.

De feiten

Performance

Let's talk numbers. The S501 is rated for 2,150 MB/s sequential reads and 1,600 MB/s writes. In our database, that puts its speed at the 49th percentile, smack in the middle of the pack. For a PCIe 3.0 drive, that's about what you'd expect. It's not going to touch a Gen4 drive like the Crucial T500 or Samsung 990 EVO, but it's roughly five times faster than a SATA SSD, which is exactly what fanxiang claims. If you're coming from a spinning hard drive or an older SATA drive, this will feel like a completely different machine.

The random performance sits at the 62nd percentile, which is actually a bit better than the sequential numbers suggest. That matters more than you'd think for everyday use. Booting Windows, launching apps, loading game levels, those are all random I/O workloads. The fact that this drive handles those reasonably well means it'll feel snappy even if the big sequential numbers don't blow you away. The TLC NAND helps here too. TLC drives tend to hold up better under sustained writes than QLC drives, which can slow to a crawl once their cache fills up.

One thing worth noting: the endurance rating of 320 TBW is solid for a 512GB drive. That's the 69th percentile in our database. For context, that means you could write about 175GB per day for five years before hitting the rated limit. Most people won't come close to that. If you're using this as a boot drive or for light gaming, it'll outlive the rest of the machine.

Performance Percentiles

Speed 49.1
Random 61.7
Feature 53.7
Capacity 34.8
Endurance 69.2
Gebruikersoordeel 61.5
Affordability 77.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 512
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Protocol NVMe
PCIe Generation 3
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 2150
Sequential Write (MB/s) 1600

Hardware

NAND TLC

Reliability

Endurance (TBW) 320

vs Competition

The S501 sits in an interesting spot. It's not trying to compete with the big names on raw speed, and that's fine. The Crucial T500 and Samsung 990 EVO are both Gen4 drives that will absolutely smoke this thing in sequential benchmarks. The T500 is a particularly strong performer in our database, and the 990 EVO is Samsung's usual polished package. But those drives cost real money, and if you're putting them in an older system with a PCIe 3.0 slot, you're leaving performance on the table anyway.

Against other budget drives, the S501 holds its own. The Western Digital WD Blue SN5100 is probably the closest mainstream competitor, and it's a solid drive with better brand recognition. The MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO and Corsair MP700 Elite are in a different league entirely, Gen4 and Gen5 drives aimed at enthusiasts who actually need that bandwidth. The S501's real competition is the no-name budget drives flooding Amazon, and against those, the TLC NAND and 320 TBW endurance give it a legitimate edge.

The trade-off is simple. You're giving up peak performance and brand reputation for a lower price. For a boot drive or secondary storage in an older system, that's a smart trade. For a primary drive in a new high-end build, you'd be better off spending more on something faster.

Spec fanxiang S501 Samsung 9100 PRO Western Digital Black SN850X Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Crucial T500
Capacity 512GB 4TB 4TB 4TB 4TB 2TB
Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 2,150 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 14,500 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache - true true true false true
Endurance 320 TBW 2400 TBW 2400 TBW 4000 TBW 2400 TBW 1200 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityEnduranceGebruikersoordeelAffordability
fanxiang S501 49.161.753.734.869.261.577.6
Samsung 9100 PRO Compare 99.299.899.792.68699.65.1
Western Digital Black SN850X Compare 8995.689.492.688.195.310.4
Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare 99.59990.992.693.687.16.3
Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare 99.199.289.492.68677.411.3
Crucial T500 Compare 9496.998.978.58395.319.5

Prijs

Value & Pricing

Here's where the S501 earns its keep. The affordability ranking sits at the 78th percentile, which means it's cheaper than most drives we track. The US listing shows $93 for the 512GB model, and the Canadian listing is CAD 134. For a TLC NVMe drive with 320 TBW endurance, that's a genuinely good deal. You're not paying for a brand name or cutting-edge tech, you're paying for a solid everyday drive that does the job.

Compare that to something like the Samsung 990 EVO or Crucial T500, and you're looking at drives that cost significantly more for performance most people won't notice in daily use. Sure, those drives are faster on paper, but if you're booting Windows and launching Chrome, the difference between 2,150 MB/s and 5,000 MB/s is measured in fractions of a second. The S501 makes a strong case that for most people, the extra money is better spent elsewhere.

The value story gets a little murkier when you factor in the quality control concerns. A great price doesn't mean much if you get a drive that dies on day one. The good news is that fanxiang's warranty should cover that, and the overwhelming majority of reviews are positive. But it's something to keep in mind. You're saving money upfront, and in exchange, you're taking on a slightly higher risk of getting a lemon.

Lees meer

Overview

The fanxiang S501 is one of those drives that makes you realize how far budget NVMe storage has come. It's a 512GB M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 drive with TLC NAND, rated for 2,150 MB/s reads and 1,600 MB/s writes. Nothing flashy on paper, but for the price it's sitting at, it's hard not to pay attention. This is the kind of drive you grab when you're resurrecting an older laptop, building a cheap office PC, or just need a fast boot drive without spending real money.

Who's it for? Honestly, anyone who wants a snappy everyday drive and doesn't need bleeding-edge Gen4 or Gen5 speeds. The affordability ranking lands at the 78th percentile in our database, which means it's priced better than most drives we track. The endurance story is decent too, 320 TBW puts it at the 69th percentile. That's not going to win any awards, but for a budget drive, it's respectable.

What makes it interesting is the value proposition. You're getting real NVMe performance, TLC NAND instead of the QLC you often see at this price point, and a drive that users seem genuinely happy with. The 4.4-star rating across 995 reviews backs that up. But there's a catch, and we'll get to it. Quality control seems to be a bit of a lottery here, and that's the thing you need to know before clicking buy.

Common Questions

Q: Will this drive work in my laptop?

The S501 uses the M.2 2280 form factor with a PCIe 3.0 x4 interface, which is the most common configuration for laptops from the last several years. It's compatible with Windows 8, 10, and 11. The main thing to check is whether your laptop has an M.2 slot that supports NVMe, since some older laptops only support SATA M.2 drives. If your laptop has a PCIe 3.0 or newer M.2 slot, you should be good to go.

Q: Is this drive good for gaming?

For most games, yes. The 2,150 MB/s read speed is more than enough for loading times, and the random performance is actually above average for this price range. You won't see the same load times as a Gen4 drive like the Crucial T500, but the difference is usually a second or two at most. The bigger limitation is the 512GB capacity, which fills up fast with modern titles. If you have a large game library, you might want to look at a 1TB drive instead.

Q: How does this compare to a SATA SSD?

It's roughly five times faster than a SATA III SSD, which maxes out around 550 MB/s. That translates to faster boot times, quicker app launches, and snappier file transfers. If you're upgrading from a SATA SSD, you'll notice the difference immediately. If you're coming from a spinning hard drive, the difference is night and day.

Q: Does this drive work with PS5?

No, fanxiang explicitly states that this drive does not work with the PS5. The PS5 requires a Gen4 NVMe drive with a minimum sequential read speed of 5,500 MB/s, and the S501 is a Gen3 drive rated at 2,150 MB/s. If you need PS5 storage, you'll need to look at Gen4 drives like the Samsung 990 EVO or Crucial T500.

Who Should Skip This

If you're building a new high-end system, skip this. The 512GB capacity is going to feel cramped within a year, and the Gen3 speeds will bottleneck a modern CPU and GPU. You'd be better off spending more on a 1TB Gen4 drive like the Crucial T500 or Samsung 990 EVO, especially if you're doing video editing or working with large files. The S501 is a budget drive for budget builds, not a foundation for a flagship system.

PS5 owners should also look elsewhere. The drive doesn't meet Sony's minimum requirements, and fanxiang says so right in the product description. If you need console storage, you'll need a Gen4 drive with at least 5,500 MB/s reads. And if you're the type who wants a drive with a long track record and rock-solid quality control, the verified reports of dead units out of the box might give you pause. In that case, the Western Digital WD Blue SN5100 is a safer bet with similar performance and better brand support.

Verdict

If you're looking for a cheap way to breathe life into an older laptop or desktop, the S501 is a genuinely good option. The TLC NAND, 320 TBW endurance, and solid random performance make it a better choice than most QLC budget drives. Users consistently report easy installation and immediate Windows recognition, which is exactly what you want when you're doing a quick upgrade. The 4.4-star rating across nearly a thousand reviews suggests most people are happy with their purchase.

But if you're building a new system and this is going to be your main drive, think twice. The 512GB capacity is going to fill up fast with modern games, and the sequential speeds are nothing special. You'd be better off spending a bit more on a 1TB drive from a more established brand, or stepping up to Gen4 if your motherboard supports it. The quality control concerns are also worth weighing. Most drives are fine, but the verified reports of dead units out of the box are hard to ignore.

For a secondary drive, a budget build, or a repair job, this is an easy recommendation. For a primary drive in a new system, it's a compromise.

Usage Scores

Algemeen (50.2)Budget (77.7)Gaming (40.4)Laptop (50.8)Console (19.3)Portable (11.4)Workstation (50.6)
  • Algemeen50.2
  • Budget77.7
  • Gaming40.4
  • Laptop50.8
  • Console19.3
  • Portable11.4
  • Workstation50.6

Andere configuraties2

Vergelijkbare producten