Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm
Offering a 10-24mm focal length that delivers a 16-38.4mm equivalent field of view on Canon APS-C bodies, this was the first 2.4X zoom to cover such a wide range. Its lightweight 405g build and 77mm filter thread add practical portability and accessory compatibility for an affordable ultra-wide zoom. This lens is best for budget-conscious APS-C DSLR users wanting expansive landscapes and interiors without investing in professional-grade glass.
No current retailer price
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Tamron Di II B001E is a 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 wide-angle zoom for APS-C DSLRs that delivers a genuinely useful ultra-wide perspective at a budget price. Image stabilization and close focus are nice bonuses, but slow autofocus and soft corners keep it from greatness. It's a specialist lens for landscape and architecture shooters who prioritize the 10mm wide end over everything else.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Genuinely useful 10-24mm range on APS-C 79th
- Image stabilization at this price is a real bonus 77th
- Lightweight at 405g, easy to carry all day 76th
- 77mm filter thread means cheap, common filters 71st
- Close focus of 0.24m adds creative flexibility
Cons
- Slow f/3.5-4.5 aperture limits low light use
- Micromotor AF is noisy and sluggish
- Soft corners, especially wide open
- No weather sealing
- No full-time manual focus override
What owners think
The Word on the Street
The proof
Performance
The headline number here is the 10mm wide end. On an APS-C sensor, that's a 16mm equivalent field of view, and it's the kind of focal length that makes small rooms feel cavernous and mountain ranges feel infinite. The lens isn't razor sharp edge to edge, and our optical score of 19th percentile confirms that. Center sharpness is decent, but corners get soft, especially wide open. Stop down to f/8 or f/11 and things improve noticeably, which is fine for landscapes but less ideal for handheld low light.
Autofocus is a micromotor, and it's about as exciting as it sounds. Our AF score puts it at 54th percentile, which is middle of the pack. It's not silent, it's not fast, and there's no full-time manual override. For static subjects like architecture and landscapes, it's perfectly usable. For anything moving, you'll be fighting it. The stabilization system is a genuine bright spot, ranking at the 80th percentile. It won't replace a tripod for long exposures, but it'll save your bacon when you're shooting handheld at 1/15th of a second in a dim cathedral. Macro performance is also surprisingly decent at 79th percentile, with a 1:5.1 magnification ratio and that 0.24m close focus. You won't be shooting insect eyeballs, but you can get close enough to make foreground elements pop in wide-angle compositions.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 10 |
| Focal Length Max | 24 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | 22-29 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-4.5 |
| Constant | No |
Build
| Mount | Canon EF-S |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 77 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Micromotor-type AF motor |
| Stabilization | Yes |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 240 |
| Max Magnification | 1:51 |
vs Competition
Stacked against the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN, the Tamron loses on aperture, sharpness, and autofocus speed. The Sigma is a constant f/2.8, which is a full stop faster at the long end, and its AF is in a different league. But the Sigma starts at 18mm, and that 8mm difference at the wide end is enormous. If you shoot interiors, architecture, or dramatic landscapes, the Tamron's 10mm is the whole point. The Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 is another competitor, but that's a Micro Four Thirds lens, so it's not even in the same mount conversation for most buyers.
The Yongnuo YN 23mm F1.4S and Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 are primes, not zooms, so they're solving different problems. They're faster and sharper, but they don't give you the flexibility of a zoom range. The Meike 85mm F1.4 II is a portrait lens, which is the exact opposite of what this Tamron is for. Our portrait score for the Tamron is 23.5 out of 100, which is rough. If you want shallow depth of field and flattering compression, look elsewhere. This lens is a wide-angle specialist, and it makes no apologies for that.
| Spec | Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm | Nikon NIKKOR 20059 | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 10-24mm | 18-55mm | 17-40mm | 12-35mm | 18-135mm | 17-40mm |
| Max Aperture | 22-29 | f/3.5 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 | f/1.4 |
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Nikon F | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Canon EF |
| Stabilization | true | true | false | true | true | false |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | true | true | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 405 | 205 | 535 | 306 | 326 | 499 |
| AF Type | Micromotor-type AF motor | pulse stepping motor | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) | Autofocus | Linear motor | USM |
| Lens Type | wide-angle | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | wide-angle |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm | 54 | 13.9 | 62 | 77.1 | 17.5 | 21.8 | 76.1 | 71.1 | 79.3 |
| Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Compare | 84.8 | 81.4 | 83.7 | 95.4 | 54.6 | 82.8 | 82.8 | 86.2 | 92.3 |
| Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare | 54 | 97 | 67.1 | 72.3 | 96.7 | 95.3 | 75.7 | 94.1 | 34.4 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 54 | 86.6 | 83.9 | 49 | 86.2 | 88.3 | 80.5 | 86.2 | 96.4 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 97.7 | 81.4 | 71 | 37.5 | 77.9 | 82.8 | 95.8 | 90.7 | 79.3 |
| Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit Compare | 93.1 | 95.6 | 70.3 | 85.5 | 77.9 | 97.5 | 75.7 | 65.6 | 34.4 |
Price
Value & Pricing
At $399 USD, the Tamron 10-24mm sits in a strange spot. It's cheaper than first-party wide zooms from Canon or Nikon, but it's also competing against newer third-party options that have moved the goalposts. The Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN is a different beast entirely, faster and sharper, but it doesn't go as wide. If you need that 10mm ultra-wide perspective on a budget, this Tamron is one of the few games in town. But if you can live with 18mm at the wide end, there are better optical performers for similar money. The value proposition really comes down to how badly you want that 10mm focal length.
Read more
Overview
The Tamron Di II B001E is a 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 wide-angle zoom built for APS-C DSLRs, and it's been around long enough to feel like an old friend. On Canon bodies you're looking at a 16-38.4mm equivalent focal length, which covers everything from dramatic ultra-wide landscapes to tighter environmental shots. It's not a new lens by any stretch, but it still pops up on the used market and at retailers for around $399 USD, which puts it in budget territory for anyone wanting to go wide without selling a kidney.
People searching for a cheap wide-angle zoom for Canon EF-S or Nikon DX will find this lens in their results, and for good reason. It's the world's first 2.4X zoom with an equivalent 16-37mm range when converted to full frame, and that range is genuinely useful. You get a 77mm filter thread, a 0.24m minimum focus distance, and image stabilization, which is a nice bonus at this price. But the f/3.5-4.5 aperture is slow, and the micromotor AF is not winning any races.
We've crunched the numbers in our database, and this lens lands at 44.3 out of 100 overall. That's not a score that sets the world on fire, but it's also not a disaster. It's a lens with clear strengths and clear compromises, and whether it's right for you depends almost entirely on what you shoot and how much you're willing to forgive.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Tamron 10-24mm good for landscape photography?
Yes, the 10-24mm focal length is excellent for landscapes, especially on APS-C cameras where it gives a 16-38.4mm equivalent field of view. The soft corners improve when stopped down to f/8 or f/11, which is typical for landscape shooting.
Q: Does the Tamron 10-24mm work on full frame cameras?
No, this is a Di II lens designed for APS-C sensors only. On a full frame Canon or Nikon body, you'll get heavy vignetting and the image circle won't cover the sensor.
Q: Is the Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 good in low light?
It's not great in low light due to the slow f/3.5-4.5 maximum aperture. The image stabilization helps with handheld shots at slower shutter speeds, but you'll still struggle in dim conditions without a tripod or high ISO.
Q: How does the Tamron 10-24mm compare to the Canon 10-18mm?
The Canon 10-18mm is lighter, cheaper, and has a faster STM autofocus motor, but the Tamron offers a longer zoom range and image stabilization. The Tamron's build feels more substantial, but the Canon is sharper in the corners.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this lens if you shoot portraits, events, or anything that moves. The slow aperture and sluggish micromotor AF will drive you nuts, and the 23.5 out of 100 portrait score tells the story. If you need a fast standard zoom, look at the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN instead. If you want a sharp prime for low light, the Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 or Yongnuo YN 23mm F1.4S are better bets. And if you're on a full frame body, this lens simply won't work for you. This is a wide-angle specialist for APS-C shooters who know exactly what they're getting into.
Verdict
Should you buy the Tamron Di II B001E? If you're on a Canon EF-S or Nikon DX body and you want to shoot ultra-wide on a budget, it's a solid yes with caveats. The 10mm wide end is the star of the show, and nothing else at this price gives you that perspective with stabilization and a useful zoom range. You'll need to accept soft corners, slow autofocus, and a dim aperture, but for landscape and architecture shooters who work on a tripod, those compromises matter less.
If you're a generalist who shoots a bit of everything, or if you care about sharpness and autofocus speed, this lens will frustrate you. It's not a do-everything lens, and it's not trying to be. It's a wide-angle specialist for people who know exactly why they want 10mm. For those people, it's still worth considering, even in a market full of newer options.