Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm

Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm

Tamron
44 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Canon
76
Tamron
44
Landscape
Canon
74
Tamron
37
Budget
Canon
66
Tamron
41
Professional
Canon
65
Tamron
31
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Tamron
37
Street
Canon
59
Tamron
33
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Tamron
34
Macro
Canon
51
Tamron
48
Portrait
Canon
45
Tamron
26

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMTamron Di II B001E 10-24mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm24 mm
Elements12—
Groups9—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2222-29★
Min Aperturef/43.5-4.5
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EFCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.50 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Micromotor-type AF motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm240 mm★
Max Magnification0.24x1:51★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Tamron Di II B001E 10-24mm

  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Strong macro (77th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (71st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Scores 61 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports