Новинка Зі знижкою 45%

fanxiang S501Q 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

★★★★★ 4.6 (904)

The 1TB fanxiang S501Q hits 3500 MB/s reads and 2500 MB/s writes over PCIe 3.0, with graphite heat stickers that keep QLC NAND cool for sustained performance and a 320 TBW endurance rating. Its DRAM-less design and 5-year warranty with included mounting screws make it a practical, low-cost upgrade for everyday systems. Best for budget builders or laptop owners who need a fast, reliable boot drive for general use, not heavy sustained writes.

Capacity 1TB
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Read Speed 3,500 MB/s
NAND QLC
Endurance 320 TBW
fanxiang S501Q 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 ssd
55 Загальна оцінка
Також доступно в:

Огляд

The 30-Second Version

The S501Q hits 3500 MB/s read and carries a 320 TBW endurance rating with a 5-year warranty, which is genuinely good for a budget drive. But user sentiment ranks in the 28th percentile, with owners reporting performance degradation and at least one dead unit. It's a solid cheap OS drive if you accept the risk, but the QLC, DRAM-less design shows its limits under sustained load.

Pros & Cons

Переваги

  • 320 TBW endurance rating beats most drives in this price class 78th
  • 3500 MB/s read speed makes boot and load times feel snappy 76th
  • 5-year warranty is longer than many budget competitors offer
  • Graphite cooling pad included for better thermals
  • Easy installation with screws and screwdriver in the box

Недоліки

  • User sentiment ranks in the 28th percentile, well below average
  • QLC NAND with no DRAM cache means sustained writes slow down hard
  • Feature set lands in the 15th percentile, bare bones even for budget
  • Multiple owners report performance degradation over time
  • At least one defective unit reported out of the box

Думка власників

The Word on the Street

4.6/5 (904 reviews)
👍 Most owners are impressed with the speed and value, saying it feels fast for everyday tasks and installs without hassle.
👍 Several buyers mention the included graphite cooling pad and easy setup as unexpected bonuses at this price.
👎 A recurring complaint is that performance degrades over time, with some owners saying they wouldn't trust it for heavy use.

Як змінювалася думка власників із часом

Ексклюзив

На основі того, коли покупці справді писали відгуки, - щоб побачити, чи виправдалися перші похвали.

Думка власників із часом покращилася
72/100Наш ШІ-аналіз настроївсередня впевненість · 13 джерел · лист. 2026 р.
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '24: 4.5★ · 2 відгуківQ1 '25: 1.0★ · 1 відгукQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 1 відгукQ1 '26: 4.4★ · 7 відгуківQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 3 відгуків21173Q3 '24Q1 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26
Середня оцінкаЗадоволені (4-5★)Незадоволені (1-2★)Висота стовпчика = кількість відгуків

На основі 14 датованих відгуків покупців, згрупованих за календарними кварталами. Аналіз за періодами - англійською.

Факти

Performance

The headline numbers are 3500 MB/s sequential read and 2500 MB/s sequential write. In our database, that puts overall speed at the 60th percentile, solidly middle of the pack. For everyday tasks, booting Windows, launching apps, loading games, you won't feel much difference between this and drives costing twice as much. The SLC cache helps short bursts feel snappy, which is why so many owners describe it as fast in day-to-day use.

The weak spot is sustained performance. QLC NAND without a DRAM cache means once that SLC cache fills up, write speeds drop hard. Random performance sits at the 62nd percentile, which is fine for an OS drive but nothing to write home about. If you're moving huge files regularly or doing heavy video editing, this drive will show its budget roots. The graphite heat spreader is a nice touch and helps keep temps in check, but it doesn't change what's under the hood.

Performance Percentiles

Speed 60.3
Random 61.7
Feature 14.7
Capacity 55.3
User Sentiment 28.8
Endurance 76.1
Відгуки користувачів 77.5
Affordability 62.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 1000
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Protocol NVMe
PCIe Generation 3
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 3500
Sequential Write (MB/s) 2500

Hardware

NAND QLC
DRAM Cache No

Reliability

Endurance (TBW) 320
MTBF (hours) 1500000
Warranty (years) 5

Features

Heatsink No

vs Competition

Stacked against the Samsung 990 PRO, Crucial T500, or WD_BLACK SN8100, the S501Q loses on every performance metric that matters. Those drives are PCIe 4.0 with TLC NAND and DRAM caches, and they're built for sustained heavy workloads. The S501Q's 3500 MB/s read is roughly half what the 990 PRO delivers, and the gap widens dramatically under sustained writes. The MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO and Lexar NM1090 PRO are similarly out of reach. But here's the thing: those drives cost significantly more per gigabyte. If your workload is booting Windows, launching games, and general desktop use, the S501Q gets you 80% of the real-world experience for a fraction of the price. The trade-off is longevity and consistency, and that's where the user sentiment data tells the real story.

Spec fanxiang S501Q Samsung 990 PRO Crucial T500 Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Western Digital BLACK SN850X MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO
Capacity 1TB 2TB 2TB 2TB 2TB 1TB
Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 3,500 MB/s 7,450 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 14,000 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type QLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache false true true true false true
Endurance 320 TBW 1200 TBW 1200 TBW 1400 TBW 1200 TBW 3000 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Товар SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEnduranceВідгуки користувачівAffordability
fanxiang S501Q 60.361.714.755.328.876.177.562.6
Samsung 990 PRO Compare 93.797.49978.578.786.195.420.7
Crucial T500 Compare 93.996.99978.578.783.195.419.7
Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Compare 98.198.597.678.5091.251.924.1
Western Digital BLACK SN850X Compare 8995.653.878.594.683.199.623.1
MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO Compare 93.981.19455.378.798.795.443.7

Ціна

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place depending on where you look. US listings range from USD 135 to USD 160 for the 1TB model, a USD 25 spread that's worth paying attention to. At the low end, you're getting a drive with above-average endurance and a 5-year warranty for less than many DRAM-equipped TLC competitors. At the high end, you're dangerously close to better-built options. The affordability score sits at the 63rd percentile, which is decent but not the screaming deal the marketing might suggest. If you're in Canada, the CAD 217 listing is the only option and feels steep for what you get. Shop around before you commit.

Від 135 USD 1 пропозиція у 1 продавця
Amazon 1 пропозиція Від 135 USD

Ми відстежуємо ціни на цей товар з 8 лист. 2026 р.. Графік з'явиться, коли буде більше даних.

Докладніше

Overview

The fanxiang S501Q hits 3500 MB/s read and 2500 MB/s write on paper, which lands it right around the middle of our SSD database for speed. That's not a knock. For a budget drive, those numbers mean Windows boots in seconds, games load without you checking your phone, and file transfers don't feel like a chore. The 320 TBW endurance rating is actually a pleasant surprise, sitting well above average for this class and backed by a 5-year warranty.

But here's the catch. This is a QLC, DRAM-less drive, and that combo shows up in our data. User sentiment sits at the 28th percentile, which is rough. Most owners are happy with the speed and price, but a meaningful chunk report performance degradation over time and at least one defective unit out of the box. The 4.6-star average across 904 reviews tells you most people get a good drive. The question is whether you want to roll those dice.

Common Questions

Q: Is the fanxiang S501Q good for gaming?

For game loading times, yes. The 3500 MB/s read speed puts it at the 60th percentile in our database, which means most games will load noticeably faster than on a SATA SSD. Just don't expect it to keep up with PCIe 4.0 drives like the Samsung 990 PRO under heavy sustained writes.

Q: How long will this drive last?

The 320 TBW endurance rating is above average for this class, landing in the 76th percentile. That translates to roughly 175 GB of writes per day for 5 years. For typical desktop use, that's plenty. But the QLC NAND and lack of DRAM cache mean real-world longevity depends heavily on your workload, and some owners report degradation sooner than expected.

Q: Does it work with my laptop?

If your laptop has an M.2 2280 slot with PCIe 3.0 x4 or better, it should work. The drive is compatible with Windows 8 and later plus macOS 10.9 and up. The graphite heat spreader helps with laptop thermals, though the laptop suitability score in our database is only 61.8 out of 100, so it's not the strongest choice for tight enclosures.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you're doing anything beyond light everyday use. The feature set ranks in the 15th percentile, which means no DRAM cache, no hardware encryption, nothing extra. If you're editing video, running databases, or moving large files regularly, the QLC NAND will slow to a crawl once the SLC cache fills. The 28th percentile user sentiment score should also give pause to anyone storing irreplaceable data. And if you're in Canada looking at the CAD 217 listing, that price puts you in range of better-built TLC drives with DRAM caches. This is a drive for budget builds and secondary storage, not mission-critical work.

Verdict

The fanxiang S501Q is a budget drive that delivers exactly what the spec sheet promises, fast boot times and snappy everyday performance at a low price. The 320 TBW endurance and 5-year warranty are genuinely impressive for this class, and the 4.6-star average across 904 reviews shows most buyers walk away happy. But the 28th percentile user sentiment score is a red flag we can't ignore. When owners report performance degradation and defective units, that's the cost of saving money on QLC, DRAM-less hardware. If you need a cheap OS drive and you're willing to accept some risk, this works. If your data matters, spend a bit more on something with TLC NAND and a DRAM cache.

Usage Scores

Загалом (55.3)Budget (82.3)Ігри (52)Laptop (61.7)Console (27.2)Portable (14.9)Workstation (44.5)

Інші конфігурації1

Схожі товари