Tamron Di III F051 20mm

Op basis van wanneer klanten hun reviews daadwerkelijk schreven - zo zie je of de eerste lof standhield.

1. Q2 202686/1004.8★7 reviews

   Buyers praised the lens as sharp, budget-friendly, and versatile for microphotography and landscapes. Some noted autofocus finickiness with nearby objects and motor noise in video.

   • 👍Sharp image quality, especially at f/3.5 to f/5.6, and good for microphotography.
   • 👍Great value for money, lightweight, and versatile across Sony camera bodies.
   • 🤔Autofocus can be finicky with nearby objects but works well for landscapes.
   • 👎Motor noise audible on camera mic during video autofocus, though not an issue for filmmakers.
2. Q2 202483/1005.0★3 reviews

   Buyers praised the lens for being lightweight, high quality, and affordable, with good detail capture for wide-angle use. One noted slow autofocus but acceptable for landscapes.

   • 👍Lightweight and good quality at a decent price.
   • 👍Captures details well for wide-angle and video work.
   • 🤔Autofocus not the fastest, but fine for landscapes.
   • 👍Affordable lens suitable for casual and travel use.
3. Q4 202280/1004.5★5 reviews

   Buyers praised the lens as sharp, lightweight, and great value, but noted autofocus noise in video and poor low-light performance.

   • 👍Excellent image quality and sharpness, even on high-resolution sensors.
   • 👍Great value for the price, often described as a steal.
   • 👎Autofocus is loud during video, potentially picked up by on-camera mics.
   • 👎Poor performance in low light conditions.
4. Q2 202293/1004.7★3 reviews

   Buyers praised the lens for close focusing, light weight, affordability, and sharp center, with minor chromatic aberration noted.

   • 👍Close focusing ability and 1:2 ratio appreciated for unique perspectives.
   • 👍Lightweight and affordable, considered a good value.
   • 👍Sharp center and universal 67mm filter size liked.
   • 🤔Some chromatic aberration present but not severe.
5. Q1 2022100/1005.0★4 reviews

   Buyers praised the lens as affordable, well-built, and sharp with good bokeh. One wished for a faster aperture.

   • 👍Affordable price point praised by multiple buyers.
   • 👍Sharp image quality and good bokeh at f2.8.
   • 👍Solid build quality and well-constructed feel.
   • 🤔Wish for faster aperture (f2.0 or f1.8) while keeping 67mm filter size.
6. Q2 202185/1004.6★10 reviews

   Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, compact size, and value. Some noted autofocus noise but found it acceptable for stills.

   • 👍Sharp image quality, true colors, and minimal barrel distortion.
   • 👍Compact, lightweight, and affordable for a wide-angle prime.
   • 🤔Autofocus noise noted; acceptable for stills but problematic for video.
   • 👍Close focusing ability praised, useful as a macro alternative.
7. Q1 202167/1004.3★3 reviews

   Buyers praise the lens for being light, sharp, and affordable, but two report a very tight fit that raises concerns about using it on expensive camera bodies.

   • 👍Lightweight, sharp, fast autofocus, and good value for the price.
   • 👎Very tight fit on camera bayonet; concern about mounting a cheap lens on a costly body.
   • 👍Metal mount and overall build quality are appreciated for the price.
   • 🤔Some buyers are very satisfied with Tamron lenses in general, but this one has fit issues.
8. Q4 2020100/1005.0★4 reviews

   All four reviews are highly positive, praising the lens as excellent, well-built, and a great budget option for Sony e-mount, with one noting a noisy focus motor.

   • 👍Lens is excellent, well-built, and delivers sharp images.
   • 👍Great budget option for Sony e-mount, especially with close focusing macro.
   • 👍Works perfectly with Sony a7II, high quality optics.
   • 🤔Focus motor is noisy but manageable with external microphone for video.
9. Q3 202087/1004.7★6 reviews

   Buyers praised the lens as a good value for its price, noting sharpness and macro capability, but some mentioned slow autofocus.

   • 👍Great value for the price, especially on sale.
   • 🤔Sharp images but autofocus is sluggish.
   • 👍Good for astrophotography and landscapes.
   • 👎Some wished for wider aperture like f/1.8.

Gebaseerd op 36 gedateerde klantreviews, gegroepeerd per kalenderkwartaal. Analyse per periode is in het Engels.