BenQ RD240Q 24.1" Black 2025
The 16:10 WQXGA IPS panel provides extra vertical space for reading code, while dedicated Coding Modes and a 95% P3 color gamut optimize text clarity. It functions as a full docking station with 90W USB-C power delivery, daisy-chain support, and a built-in USB hub to reduce desk clutter. This monitor is best for software developers who spend long hours in IDEs and need eye-care features like Low Blue Light and a Circadian Mode.
요약
The 30-Second Version
The BenQ RD240Q is a coding-focused monitor with a 16:10 aspect ratio and excellent text clarity. It's not fast at 60Hz, but the eye care features and 90W USB-C power delivery make it a comfortable daily driver for programmers. Worth buying if you can find it at the lower end of the price range.
Pros & Cons
장점
- 16:10 aspect ratio gives you more vertical room for code 98th
- Excellent text clarity that users consistently praise 91st
- 90W USB-C power delivery charges your laptop while connected 90th
- Blue light reduction genuinely helps with eye strain 89th
단점
- 60Hz refresh rate feels sluggish if you're used to faster panels
- Built-in speakers are weak at 2x2W
- Price is hard to justify for the specs on paper
- 300 nits brightness is just okay, not great for bright rooms
사용자 의견
The Word on the Street
시간에 따라 사용자 평판이 어떻게 변했는가
독점고객이 실제로 리뷰를 작성한 시점을 기준으로 합니다. 초기의 호평이 유지되었는지 확인할 수 있습니다.
날짜가 있는 고객 리뷰 2건을 기준으로 달력 분기별로 묶었습니다. 기간별 분석은 영어로 제공됩니다.
근거 자료
Performance
The display itself is a mixed bag depending on what you're measuring. Color accuracy lands in the 89th percentile, which is genuinely good for a productivity monitor. The 300 nits brightness is fine for indoor use, and HDR10 support is there but don't expect much from it. The 60Hz refresh rate puts it in the 21st percentile for performance, which is rough if you're used to anything faster. But for coding, reading, and debugging, the 5ms response time is perfectly adequate. The real performance story here is the 16:10 aspect ratio. That extra vertical space is the whole reason this monitor exists, and it delivers.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 24.1" |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 (QHD) |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:10 |
| Curved | No |
| Screen Finish | matte |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 5 |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 10-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 |
| USB-C | 2 |
| Thunderbolt | N/A |
| Speakers | Yes |
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
Ergonomics
| Height Adjustable | Yes |
| Tilt | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes |
| Pivot | Yes |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 |
Features
| Webcam | No |
| Touchscreen | No |
| PIP/PBP | No |
| Power | 20 |
| Weight | 7.6 kg / 16.8 lbs |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the RD240Q occupies a weird niche. The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG and MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 are gaming-focused OLED panels that blow this out of the water on refresh rate and contrast, but they're also bigger and more expensive. The LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B and Samsung Odyssey G60SD are similar stories. The Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 is probably the closest competitor in spirit, but it's still a 27-inch 16:9 panel. None of them offer the 16:10 aspect ratio or the coding-specific modes that make the RD240Q unique. If you want a dedicated coding monitor, this is basically the only game in town at this size.
| Spec | BenQ RD240Q 24.1" | ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 | LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B | Samsung Odyssey G60SD | Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 24.100000381469727 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1600 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED | QD-OLED | OLED | QD-OLED | OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 60 | 500 | 240 | 480 | 360 | 240 |
| Response Time Ms | 5 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 |
| Adaptive Sync | - | G-Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Hdr | HDR10 | DisplayHDR True Black 500 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | HDR10+ | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 제품 | Color | 휴대성 | Display | Feature | User Sentiment | Performance | Connectivity | 사용자 평판 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BenQ RD240Q 24.1" | 89.2 | 86.2 | 69 | 69.9 | 46.2 | 21.4 | 98.3 | 90.2 |
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG Compare | 99.1 | 58.8 | 79 | 69.9 | 95.6 | 99.9 | 93.4 | 99.4 |
| MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Compare | 99.1 | 58.8 | 79 | 84.8 | 95.6 | 98 | 82 | 99.4 |
| LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B Compare | 80.2 | 58.8 | 79 | 69.9 | 95.6 | 99.8 | 98.3 | 98.2 |
| Samsung Odyssey G60SD Compare | 91.1 | 40.8 | 79 | 69.9 | 95.6 | 99.6 | 87.9 | 95.2 |
| Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA Compare | 85.1 | 58.8 | 97.9 | 84.8 | 92.5 | 98 | 82 | 69.8 |
가격
Value & Pricing
Here's where things get interesting. The price spread across US vendors is wild, ranging from USD 260 to USD 741. That's a USD 481 gap for the same monitor. If you can find it at the lower end of that range, it's a solid deal. At the higher end, you're paying a premium for the coding-specific features and eye care tech. The 90W USB-C power delivery adds real value since it eliminates a separate laptop charger. But at full price, you're competing with some excellent general-purpose monitors that offer more versatility for less money.
Best Buy 가격 1개 최저 US$260
Amazon 가격 2개 최저 US$470
Price History
더 보기
Overview
The BenQ RD240Q is a monitor that knows exactly who it's for. Coders. The 24.1-inch 16:10 panel gives you extra vertical space, which means less scrolling through long files. It's not trying to be a gaming monitor or a portable screen, and that focus shows in both its strengths and its compromises.
At 2560 x 1600, text is sharp and the IPS panel covers 95% DCI-P3 with 10-bit color. That's a solid combo for staring at code all day. The 60Hz refresh rate and 5ms response time won't impress anyone looking for smooth motion, but that's not the point here. This is a workhorse for people who live in terminals and IDEs.
Common Questions
Q: Is the 60Hz refresh rate a problem for coding?
No, for coding and text work 60Hz is perfectly fine. The 5ms response time won't cause any issues with scrolling or typing. You'd only notice the difference if you're gaming or doing motion-heavy work.
Q: Can this monitor charge my laptop?
Yes, the USB-C port delivers 90W of power, which is enough to charge most laptops while connected. You can run your display and charge your machine with a single cable.
Q: Is the 16:10 aspect ratio worth it over a standard 16:9 monitor?
For coding specifically, yes. The extra vertical space means you see more lines of code without scrolling. It's a noticeable quality-of-life improvement if you work with long files regularly.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need a monitor for gaming or any motion-heavy work. The 60Hz refresh rate and 5ms response time will feel sluggish compared to even budget gaming monitors. Also skip it if you're on a tight budget and don't specifically need the 16:10 ratio or coding modes. A standard 27-inch 1440p monitor will give you more screen real estate for less money, even if it lacks the eye care features.
Verdict
Buy this if you're a coder who spends 8+ hours a day staring at text and you value your eyes more than raw specs. The 16:10 ratio, blue light reduction, and USB-C power delivery make it a genuinely comfortable daily driver. The 60Hz refresh rate and mediocre speakers are acceptable trade-offs for the target audience. Just make sure you're not paying full price for it.