가격 인하 26%

Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC

★★★☆☆ 3.4 (368)

The 18-200mm zoom covers a 27-300mm equivalent range on APS-C cameras, with image stabilization and auto panning detection in a lightweight 405g body. A 0.45m minimum focus and 1:4.4 magnification enable versatile close-up shooting, while 72mm filter threads support easy accessory use. This lens suits outdoor travelers and hobbyists needing a single all-in-one option for landscapes and macro work, though portraiture results remain modest.

Focal length 18-200mm
Aperture f/22
Mount Nikon F
stabilization 예
Weight 394 g
af type Autofocus
lens type telephoto
Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC lens
52 종합 점수

요약

The 30-Second Version

The Sigma 18-200mm lands in the 98th percentile for versatility, giving you an 11x zoom range that's basically unmatched at this price. The optical stabilization is a genuine highlight, letting you get sharp shots handheld even when the slow f/6.3 aperture is starving the sensor for light. It's a fantastic daylight travel lens for $178, but the noisy autofocus and rough bokeh mean it's not for low-light or portrait work.

Pros & Cons

장점

  • Incredible 11x zoom range, top-tier versatility 98th
  • Optical stabilization is a standout, sharp handheld shots 88th
  • Surprisingly good optical quality for a superzoom 83rd
  • Lightweight at 394g, easy to carry all day 67th
  • Great value at $178 compared to first-party options

단점

  • Slow f/6.3 aperture on the long end kills low-light use
  • Bokeh is harsh and busy, one of the worst we've seen
  • Noisy, hunting autofocus in dim conditions
  • Noticeable distortion, especially at the wide end
  • No weather sealing, and some long-term reliability concerns

사용자 의견

The Word on the Street

3.4/5 (368 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently praise the optical stabilization, saying it delivers sharp handheld shots in conditions that would normally require a tripod.
👍 The value for money is a recurring theme, with many buyers noting it performs well above its price point compared to Nikon or Canon equivalents.
👎 A common complaint is the weight and bulk, with several users surprised by how much heavier it is than a typical kit lens.
🤔 Autofocus performance splits opinions, it's fast and quiet in good light but hunts noisily in dimmer conditions.

시간에 따라 사용자 평판이 어떻게 변했는가

독점

고객이 실제로 리뷰를 작성한 시점을 기준으로 합니다. 초기의 호평이 유지되었는지 확인할 수 있습니다.

사용자 평판이 시간이 지나며 좋아졌습니다
78/100당사 AI 감성 분석신뢰도 낮음 · 9개 출처 · 2026년 5월
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '07: 5.0★ · 1 리뷰Q1 '08: 3.5★ · 4 리뷰Q2 '08: 5.0★ · 1 리뷰Q3 '08: 3.5★ · 2 리뷰Q4 '08: 2.5★ · 2 리뷰Q3 '11: 4.5★ · 2 리뷰Q1 '13: 5.0★ · 1 리뷰Q2 '14: 4.0★ · 1 리뷰Q2 '15: 5.0★ · 1 리뷰Q3 '15: 4.0★ · 1 리뷰Q4 '15: 4.0★ · 1 리뷰Q1 '17: 5.0★ · 1 리뷰Q2 '18: 3.0★ · 1 리뷰Q4 '19: 4.5★ · 2 리뷰14122211111112Q2 '07Q2 '08Q4 '08Q1 '13Q2 '15Q4 '15Q2 '18Q4 '19
평균 평점만족 (4-5★)불만족 (1-2★)막대 높이 = 리뷰 수

날짜가 있는 고객 리뷰 21건을 기준으로 달력 분기별로 묶었습니다. 기간별 분석은 영어로 제공됩니다.

근거 자료

Performance

Optically, this lens punches above its weight. With 15 elements in 13 groups, including a couple of aspherical and ED elements, it delivers sharpness that's well above average for a superzoom. The stabilization is a real standout, letting you handhold shots at slow shutter speeds that would turn most budget zooms into a blurry mess. In our database, it's in the 83rd percentile for stabilization, and owners consistently call that out as the feature that saves this lens in dim conditions.

Autofocus is where things get middling. The micromotor is quick enough in good light, but it's noisy and can hunt when the sun goes down, landing right around the 54th percentile. Macro performance is about average too, with a 1:4.4 magnification that's fine for close-up flower shots but won't replace a dedicated macro lens. The real weak spot is the aperture. At f/6.3 on the telephoto end, you're fighting for light, and the bokeh is busy and distracting, which is why it scores so low in that category.

Performance Percentiles

AF 53.7
Bokeh 13.4
Build 66.6
Macro 60.2
Optical 87.6
Aperture 20.4
User Sentiment 29.6
Versatility 98.3
사용자 평판 64
Stabilization 82.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Telephoto
Focal Length Min 18
Focal Length Max 200
Elements 15
Groups 13
Aspherical Elements 2
ED Elements 2
Coating super multi-layer coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/22
Min Aperture 3.5-6.3
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 7

Build

Mount Nikon F
Format APS-C
Weather Sealed No
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs
Filter Thread 62

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization Yes

Focus

Min Focus Distance 450
Max Magnification 1:4.4

vs Competition

Stacked against the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR, the Sigma gives you way more reach but loses the silent, snappy AF motor and compact size of the Nikon. The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 is in a different league optically and for low light, but it's a standard zoom, not a superzoom, and it costs a lot more. The Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is smaller and has power zoom, but again, you're capped at 50mm. If you need the range, the Sigma is the only game in town at this price. If you don't need 200mm, almost any modern kit zoom will feel more refined and focus faster.

Spec Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001 Canon EF 1.4X III Telephoto Extender for Super Telephoto Lenses
Focal Length 18-200mm 17-70mm 16-50mm 16-50mm - 75-300mm
Max Aperture f/22 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/0 f/1.4
Mount Nikon F Sony E Nikon Z Sony E GoPro HERO Black Mount Canon EF
Stabilization true true true true true true
Weather Sealed false true false true true true
Weight (g) 394 544 135 107 100 625
AF Type Autofocus RXD Stepping Motor Autofocus - Autofocus
Lens Type telephoto zoom zoom zoom wide-angle zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
제품 AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatility사용자 평판Stabilization
Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC 53.713.466.660.287.620.429.698.36482.6
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare 53.786.169.885.191.183.163.289.585.582.6
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Compare 87.774.192.844.974.676.3083.277.795.4
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 53.774.198.643.769.176.363.283.281.293.5
GoPro HB-Series AEWAL-001 Compare 53.710098.714.146.310090.833.683.282.6
Canon EF 1.4X III Telephoto Extender for Super Telephoto Lenses Compare 53.796.564.570.675.896.129.688.220.296.9

가격

Value & Pricing

At $178, this lens is a steal if you understand what you're buying. You're getting a do-it-all zoom range with solid optics and excellent stabilization for less than the cost of a decent prime lens. The value proposition is the main reason owners rate it well, with many comparing it favorably to Nikon's own 18-200mm which costs significantly more. Just know that you're trading speed and refinement for that price. The slow aperture and noisy AF are the cost of entry here, but if you're shooting mostly in daylight and want one lens to leave on your camera, the price-to-performance ratio is hard to beat.

최저 US$178 소매점 1곳, 가격 1개
Amazon 가격 1개 최저 US$178

Price History

US$0 US$200 US$400 US$600 US$800 5월 3일7월 18일9월 12일 US$178

더 보기

Overview

The Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC is a superzoom that lands in the 98th percentile for versatility, and honestly, that's the whole story here. You're getting an 11x zoom range that covers everything from wide landscapes to decent telephoto reach, all in a package that weighs just 394g. For a walkaround lens on an old Nikon DX body, that kind of flexibility is hard to argue with, especially when you see the optical performance sitting in the 88th percentile. It's sharper than it has any right to be for this price.

But you feel those compromises everywhere else. The aperture is slow, bottoming out at f/6.3 on the long end, which puts it in the 21st percentile. That means this lens gets dark fast as you zoom in, and the bokeh is, well, pretty rough at the 13th percentile. The micromotor AF is noisy and hunts in low light, and the build, while decent, isn't weather-sealed. It's a classic superzoom trade-off: you get the range, but you give up speed and refinement.

Common Questions

Q: Does the autofocus work on Nikon D3xxx and D5xxx series bodies?

Yes, but with a catch. This lens uses a micromotor AF drive, so it requires a camera body with a built-in focus motor. The Nikon D3xxx and D5xxx series lack this motor, meaning the lens will not autofocus on those bodies. You'll need a D7xxx series or higher, or any older film-era body with a screw-drive motor, for AF to work.

Q: How bad is the distortion at 18mm?

It's noticeable, especially if you're shooting architecture or anything with straight lines. The lens sits in the 88th percentile for overall optics, but that's buoyed by sharpness and stabilization. Barrel distortion at the wide end is a known weak point, and you'll want to enable in-camera corrections or fix it in post if you're shooting RAW.

Q: Is the image stabilization good enough for video?

The stabilization is in the 83rd percentile, so it's quite effective for stills, letting you handhold at surprisingly slow shutter speeds. For video, it will smooth out minor shakes, but the noisy AF motor will likely be picked up by your camera's onboard mic. If you're shooting video, plan on using an external microphone or manual focus.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you shoot in low light or care about bokeh. The f/6.3 aperture on the long end is a real limitation, and the bokeh quality is in the 13th percentile, meaning backgrounds will look busy and distracting. Portrait shooters should look elsewhere, the 37.3/100 score in that category tells you everything you need to know. Also, if you're on a Nikon D3xxx or D5xxx body without a focus motor, this lens won't autofocus for you, making it a manual-focus-only affair. And if you need weather sealing or silent AF for video, this isn't your lens.

Verdict

The Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC is the definition of a trade-off lens. You get best-in-class versatility and shockingly good stabilization for under $200, but you pay for it with a dim, slow aperture and autofocus that feels straight out of 2008. It's a perfect daylight travel lens for someone who hates swapping glass, and the optical quality will surprise you. Just don't expect it to perform in low light, and maybe budget for a repair fund given some of the long-term reliability grumbles from owners. For the right shooter, it's a bargain. For everyone else, it's a compromise too far.

Usage Scores

Macro (61.7)종합 (52)Budget (55.7)Street (50.2)Travel (57.9)Portrait (37.4)Landscape (63.9)Professional (51.5)Video Cinema (48)Wildlife Sports (54.7)

유사 제품