Crucial CT8G4DFS8266 8GB DDR4-3200
Crucial
51 종합 점수
vs
Patriot Viper Venom 32GB DDR5-6000
Patriot
79 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Crucial CT8G4DFS8266 | Patriot Viper Venom | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 36 |
| Timings | 16-18-18-36 | 36-36-36-76 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.25 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✓★ |
장단점
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266 8GB DDR4-3200
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Patriot Viper Venom 32GB DDR5-6000
- Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong latency (75th percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
가격
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266 8GB DDR4-32000.850달러당 점수
vs
Patriot Viper Venom 32GB DDR5-60000.229달러당 점수
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266 8GB DDR4-3200 3.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Patriot Viper Venom
Scores 79 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
