FRCAZRGBB

The 12-core, 24-thread Xeon E5-2697 v2 delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its age with a 3.5GHz boost clock and 30MB of L3 cache on the LGA2011 platform. Each used unit is pulled from a working machine and double-tested before shipment, backed by a 1-year warranty for budget-conscious builds. This processor is best for home lab enthusiasts upgrading legacy dual-socket servers for virtualized workloads or threaded applications on a minimal budget.

Cores 12
Threads 24
Boost Clock 3500 MHz
L3 Cache 30 MB
TDP 130 W
Socket LGA2011
FRCAZRGBB cpu
40 総合スコア
他の国でも利用可能:

概要

The 30-Second Version

The Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a 12-core, 24-thread server CPU from 2013 that still delivers solid multi-threaded performance for around $74 used. It's a great value if you already have an LGA2011 motherboard, but single-thread speed is below average and the platform is aging. Best for homelab servers and heavily threaded workloads, not for gaming or everyday desktops.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • 12 cores and 24 threads for around $74 used 83rd
  • Strong multi-threaded performance for the price 72nd
  • 30MB of L3 cache helps with server workloads 68th
  • ECC DDR3 support if you need memory reliability
  • PCIe 3.0 with plenty of lanes on the right board

短所

  • Single-thread performance is below average
  • LGA2011 motherboards are old and getting expensive
  • 130W TDP means real cooling and power draw
  • No integrated graphics, you'll need a GPU
  • DDR3 memory is slower and pricier than it used to be

実証データ

Performance

In our database, the E5-2697 v2 lands at the 67th percentile for multi-thread performance, which is honestly respectable for a chip this old. The PassMark multi-core score of 14,248 puts it ahead of plenty of budget modern CPUs when it comes to raw parallel throughput. If you're transcoding video, compiling code, or running multiple VMs, those 24 threads still do real work. The 30MB of L3 cache helps too, especially for database workloads where cache misses hurt.

But single-thread is where the age shows. The 1,781 PassMark single-core score sits at the 44th percentile, which means it's below average compared to everything else in our database. That 3.5GHz boost clock only applies when a single core is active, and even then, Ivy Bridge's IPC is nowhere near what a modern Ryzen or Core chip delivers. In practice, this means snappy enough for basic desktop use, but noticeably slower than a $100 modern CPU for anything that isn't heavily parallelized. The 130W TDP also means you'll want decent cooling and a power supply that can handle the draw, especially if you're running all 12 cores flat out.

Performance Percentiles

AI 53.2
Feature 20.4
Platform 72.1
Efficiency 58
Multi Thread 67.5
ユーザー評価 5.6
Affordability 82.8
Single Thread 44.5

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Xeon E5
Model E5-2697 v2
Codename Ivy Bridge-EP
Class server
Process 22

Cores & Clocks

Cores 12
Threads 24
Base Clock 2700
Boost Clock 3500

Cache

L3 Cache 30 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 14248
PassMark Single 1781

Memory

Memory Type DDR3
Channels 4
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket LGA2011
PCIe 3
TDP 130
Unlocked No

vs Competition

Stacked against something like the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, the E5-2697 v2 looks like a relic. The 9600X has fewer cores but absolutely destroys the Xeon in single-thread performance, and its multi-core score isn't far behind despite having half the threads. For gaming or mixed-use desktops, there's no contest. The Ryzen wins. But the 9600X also costs several times more, so it's not exactly a fair fight. The Xeon's real competition is other used server silicon.

The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is an interesting alternative from the same era. It's a quad-core chip with higher clocks, so it trades multi-thread muscle for better single-thread response. If your workload is lightly threaded, the 2637 V2 might actually feel snappier. The Phenom II X6 and the be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 aren't really in the same category, but they show up in our database as alternatives people cross-shop. The Phenom is even older and slower, while the Ryzen 3 is a modern budget chip that'll beat the Xeon in everyday tasks but can't touch it in heavily parallel workloads. For pure core count per dollar, the E5-2697 v2 still holds its own.

Spec FRCAZRGBB AMD Ryzen 5 9600X Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 D&H Core i9 X-Series BX80673I99900X ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5
Cores 12 6 32 10 6 4
Threads 24 12 64 20 6 4
Boost Clock Mhz 3500 5400 3500 4400 3600 3400
L3 Cache Mb 30 32 256 19.25 6 8
Tdp W 130 65 200 165 125 270
Socket LGA2011 AM5 Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) LGA 2066 AM3 AM4
Integrated Graphics - AMD Radeon Graphics No - - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti Threadユーザー評価AffordabilitySingle Thread
FRCAZRGBB 53.220.472.15867.55.682.844.5
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X Compare 84.293.495.294.984.596.558.895.9
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare 99.190.976.497.499.1088.488.7
D&H Core i9 X-Series BX80673I99900X Compare 80.662.681.463.776.47826.870.3
ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX Compare 32.274.85433.234.37854.533.9
be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare 4662.66131.344.390.475.849.9

価格

Value & Pricing

At $74 USD for a used chip, the value proposition is weirdly compelling if you already have an LGA2011 board lying around. The affordability percentile sits at 83, which means this is one of the cheaper ways to get 12 cores and 24 threads. But the total cost of ownership is higher than the sticker price suggests. You need a compatible motherboard, DDR3 ECC or non-ECC memory, a cooler that can handle 130W, and a discrete GPU since there's no integrated graphics. By the time you piece all that together, you might be within spitting distance of a used Ryzen 5 3600 system that'll run circles around this thing in most tasks. If you're building from scratch, the Xeon only makes sense if you find a killer deal on a full platform. If you're upgrading an existing server, it's a no-brainer.

最安 $74 1店舗で1件の価格
Amazon 1件の価格 最安 $74

Price History

$73 $73 $74 $74 $75 10月3日11月4日 $74

詳細情報

Overview

The Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 is one of those old server chips that refuses to die. It's a 12-core, 24-thread Ivy Bridge-EP processor from 2013, and you can still find used ones floating around for about $74 USD. That's a lot of cores for the price of a decent dinner. But you're also buying into a platform that's over a decade old, with DDR3 memory and a socket that's been out of production for years. If you're hunting for a cheap home server or a budget workstation for heavily threaded workloads, this thing still has a pulse. Just don't expect it to feel modern.

People searching for this chip usually want to know one thing: is a used Xeon E5 still worth it in 2025? The short answer is maybe, depending on what you're doing. For video encoding, virtualization, or running a NAS with a bunch of services, 12 Ivy Bridge cores can still chew through work. For gaming or anything that leans on single-thread speed, you're going to feel every one of those 12 years. The 2.7GHz base clock and 3.5GHz single-core boost were fine when Haswell was the new hotness. Now they're just adequate.

The other big question is compatibility. This is an LGA2011 chip, not LGA2011-3, so you need an X79 board or a server board from that era. Those boards are getting harder to find and prices on decent ones have crept up. You're not just buying a CPU, you're buying into an ecosystem that's mostly held together by eBay listings and forum threads. That's not necessarily a dealbreaker, but it's the kind of thing you should know before you click buy.

Common Questions

Q: Is the Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 good for gaming?

Not really. With a gaming score of 19 out of 100, this chip struggles in games that depend on single-thread speed. The low 2.7GHz base clock and aging Ivy Bridge architecture just can't keep up with modern CPUs, even budget ones.

Q: What motherboard works with the Xeon E5-2697 v2?

You need an LGA2011 socket motherboard, typically an X79 chipset board or a server board from the same era. Make sure it's LGA2011 and not LGA2011-3, since the newer socket is not compatible with this chip.

Q: Does the E5-2697 v2 support ECC memory?

Yes, it supports DDR3 ECC memory across four channels. That's one of the main reasons people still use this chip in home servers and NAS builds where data integrity matters.

Q: How much power does the Xeon E5-2697 v2 use?

It has a 130W TDP, which is on the higher side. You'll want a decent cooler and a power supply that can handle the draw, especially if you're running all 12 cores under sustained load.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this chip if you're building a gaming PC or a general-purpose desktop. The single-thread performance is below average, and you'll need a discrete GPU since there's no integrated graphics. Skip it too if you don't already own an LGA2011 motherboard, because finding a good one at a reasonable price is getting harder. If you want a budget workstation for mixed workloads, a used Ryzen 5 or a modern Core i3 will feel much faster in day-to-day use. This Xeon is for homelab enthusiasts, server tinkerers, and people who specifically need lots of cheap cores for parallel workloads. Everyone else should look elsewhere.

Verdict

Should you buy an Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 in 2025? If you have an LGA2011 board already, yes. It's a cheap way to max out that platform with 12 cores and 24 threads, and for server tasks it's still genuinely useful. The 1-year warranty from this seller is a nice touch for a used chip, and the fact that they test before shipping takes some of the risk out of buying decade-old silicon.

But if you're building a new system from scratch, think hard. The motherboard situation alone makes this a tougher sell than the CPU price suggests. You're buying into a dead platform with DDR3 memory and no upgrade path. For most people, a used Ryzen or even a newer budget Intel chip will be the smarter long-term play. This Xeon is a specialist's chip now, great for homelab tinkerers and budget server builders, not for anyone who wants a daily driver that feels modern.

Usage Scores

総合 (40.4)AI/LLM (42.7)Budget (38.1)ゲーム (19)Server (53.5)Efficiency (25.9)Productivity (50.4)

その他の構成2

類似製品