セール中 16%

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851

★★★★★ 4.7 (548)

The 20-core Arrow Lake-S architecture on the 3nm process delivers a 58,722 PassMark multi-core score with a 125W TDP, making it a standout for cool and efficient high-throughput computing. Its unlocked multiplier and bundled Z890 motherboard provide robust PCIe 5.0 support and Wi-Fi 7 connectivity, offering a strong foundation for future-proof builds. This processor is best for AI developers and content creators running heavily threaded workloads who prioritize efficiency over peak gaming frame rates.

Cores 20
Threads 20
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
L3 Cache 30 MB
TDP 125 W
Socket LGA1851
Integrated Graphics None
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851 cpu
96 総合スコア
他の国でも利用可能:

概要

The 30-Second Version

The Core Ultra 7 265KF posts a 58,540 PassMark multi-core score, good for the 95th percentile, and a 4,927 single-core score that's in the 99th percentile. It runs cool, overclocks, and delivers huge gains for anyone coming from an older Intel chip. Just budget for a new motherboard, DDR5 RAM, and a discrete GPU since there's no integrated graphics.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • 58,540 PassMark multi-core score, 95th percentile 99th
  • 4,927 single-thread score, 99th percentile 97th
  • 20 cores (8P+12E) with 5.5GHz boost 96th
  • Runs cool thanks to 3nm TSMC process 96th
  • Unlocked for overclocking on LGA1851

短所

  • No integrated graphics, discrete GPU required
  • New motherboard and DDR5 RAM needed
  • Installation risk of bending socket pins
  • Not a meaningful upgrade from recent Intel chips

オーナーの声

The Word on the Street

4.7/5 (548 reviews)
👍 Owners upgrading from older Intel chips like the 8700K report massive performance gains in both gaming and productivity, with one noting a 20fps average increase.
👍 Multiple buyers praise the thermal performance, saying the chip runs cool even under heavy load, which is a welcome change from previous Intel generations.
🤔 Several users note that while the chip is excellent value on discount, it's not a worthwhile upgrade if you're already on a recent Intel generation.

購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか

独自

顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。

購入者の評価は一定を保っています
88/100当社のAIによる感情分析▲28信頼度: 中 · 14 件のソース · 2026年11月
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 4 レビューQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 1 レビュー (推定日)11421Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q2 '26
平均評価満足(4〜5★)不満(1〜2★)バーの高さ = レビュー件数推定日

日付のある顧客レビュー 9 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。

実証データ

Performance

The headline number is 58,540 in PassMark multi-core, which lands this chip in the 95th percentile. That's the kind of score that chews through 8K video editing, heavy multitasking, and productivity workloads without breaking a sweat. Single-core performance is even more elite at 4,927, putting it in the 99th percentile. The 5.5GHz boost clock on the P-cores does the heavy lifting there, and the 12 E-cores handle background tasks so the big cores stay focused.

The cache setup is generous too: 30MB of L3 and 36MB of L2. That's a lot of fast memory close to the cores, which helps with gaming frame times and latency-sensitive workloads. The 3nm TSMC N3B process is a big reason this thing stays cool under load, and the 125W base power with 250W turbo is manageable for most mid-range coolers. One thing to note: there's no integrated GPU, so you'll need a dedicated card. For most people buying a chip like this, that's already the plan.

Performance Percentiles

AI 95.5
Feature 96.9
Platform 90.7
User Sentiment 78.7
Efficiency 95.5
Multi Thread 95.2
ユーザー評価 90.7
Single Thread 99.2

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Core Ultra 7
Model 265KF
Codename Arrow Lake-S
Class desktop
Process 3

Cores & Clocks

Cores 20
P-cores 8
E-cores 12
Threads 20
Base Clock 3900
Boost Clock 5500

Cache

L2 Cache 36
L3 Cache 30 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 58540
PassMark Single 4927

Memory

Memory Type DDR5
Max Speed 6400
Channels 2
Max Memory 192
ECC No

Platform & Power

Socket LGA1851
PCIe 5
PCIe Lanes 24
TDP 125
Max Turbo Power 250
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics None
NPU TOPS 13

vs Competition

Against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the 265KF trades blows depending on workload. The 9800X3D's 3D V-Cache gives it an edge in gaming frame rates, but the 265KF's 20 cores and 95th percentile multi-thread score make it the better pick for mixed productivity and gaming use. The older Intel parts in our comparison set, like the Core i9 X-Series, simply can't keep up with the 3nm efficiency and single-thread performance here. The 265KF's 99th percentile single-thread ranking is the real differentiator: it's faster per-core than nearly everything we've tested, which matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded games. If you're building a do-everything rig and don't need the absolute top gaming frame rates, this chip is the smarter all-rounder.

Spec Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D G.Skill Trident Z Neo WowWee Xeon Gold 5120 be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 CISCO SYSTEMS - ENTERPRISE Xeon E5-2699v4
Cores 20 8 6 14 4 22
Threads 20 16 12 28 4 12
Boost Clock Mhz 5500 5200 4200 3200 3400 3600
L3 Cache Mb 30 96 32 19.25 8 39
Tdp W 125 120 65 105 270 -
Socket LGA1851 AM5 AMD Socket AM4 LGA 3647 AM4 LGA2011-3
Integrated Graphics None AMD Radeon Graphics - - - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AIFeaturePlatformUser SentimentEfficiencyMulti Threadユーザー評価Single Thread
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 95.596.990.778.795.595.290.799.2
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare 91.398.595.192.487.79096.695.7
G.Skill Trident Z Neo Compare 72.587.178.208373.51.572.4
WowWee Xeon Gold 5120 Compare 73.820.217.7072.874.438.344.4
be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare 47.962.360.7032.844.490.750.5
CISCO SYSTEMS - ENTERPRISE Xeon E5-2699v4 Compare 44.546.417.7030.152.651.210.3

価格

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place right now. US listings range from $220 to $657 across 10 vendors, which is a $437 spread. That's not a typo. If you can find this chip near the low end of that range, it's an absolute steal for the performance on offer. The budget score of 97.6/100 in our database reflects that potential. Canadian buyers see a tighter but still meaningful spread of CAD 313 to CAD 496 across 4 listings. The key is patience: this chip goes on discount regularly, and multiple owners specifically mention getting it at a reduced price as a major selling point. Don't pay full retail if you can wait a few weeks.

最安 $340 1店舗で5件の価格

Price History

New Kit Open Box / Refurbished
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 6月9日7月3日10月1日11月5日 $340

詳細情報

Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF lands in the 95th percentile for multi-threaded performance in our database, which puts it ahead of nearly everything else on the market right now. That's a 58,540 PassMark multi-core score backed by 20 cores split into 8 P-cores and 12 E-cores, with a 5.5GHz boost clock on tap. Single-threaded work is even more impressive at 4,927, good for the 99th percentile. If you're coming from something like an 8700K, this chip will feel like a time machine.

But there's a catch. No integrated graphics means you need a discrete GPU, period. And you're also committing to the LGA1851 socket, which means a new 800-series motherboard and DDR5 RAM. The 125W base TDP and 250W turbo draw are reasonable for this class, and the 3nm TSMC process keeps thermals in check. Owners report it runs cool, which is a nice change of pace for a high-end Intel part.

Common Questions

Q: Do I need a discrete GPU with the 265KF?

Yes. The 'F' in 265KF means there's no integrated graphics. You'll need a dedicated graphics card to get any video output at all. This is standard for Intel's F-series chips and helps keep the price down.

Q: What motherboard and RAM do I need?

This chip uses the LGA1851 socket, so you'll need an Intel 800-series motherboard. It also requires DDR5 RAM, up to 192GB across 2 channels. If you're coming from an older Intel platform, you'll need to upgrade both.

Q: How does the 265KF compare to the 14700K?

The 265KF uses the newer 3nm TSMC process and Arrow Lake architecture, which brings better efficiency and thermals. The 20-core configuration (8P+12E) is similar in layout to the 14700K, but the 265KF's 99th percentile single-thread performance and 95th percentile multi-thread performance put it ahead in most workloads. That said, if you already own a 14700K, the upgrade isn't dramatic enough to justify the cost.

Who Should Skip This

If you're already running a recent Intel chip like a 13th or 14th gen i7, this upgrade probably isn't worth it. The performance gains are real but incremental, and you'd be paying for a new motherboard and DDR5 RAM on top of the CPU. The 77.7/100 server score also suggests this isn't the right pick for always-on server workloads. And if you're building a pure gaming rig where every frame matters, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 3D V-Cache still wins in most gaming benchmarks. The 265KF is a productivity monster first, gamer second.

Verdict

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is one of the best high-end desktop CPUs we've seen this generation. The 95th percentile multi-thread score and 99th percentile single-thread score tell the story: this thing is fast at everything. Owners upgrading from older Intel chips report massive gains, with one noting a 20fps average increase in games. The lack of integrated graphics is a non-issue for anyone building a serious rig, and the thermal performance is genuinely impressive for a 20-core part. The only real caveat is the platform cost: new motherboard, new RAM, and a discrete GPU are all required. If you're already planning a full build, this chip is an easy recommendation.

Usage Scores

総合 (95.7)AI/LLM (92.7)Budget (97.6)ゲーム (88.1)Server (77.6)Efficiency (83.3)Productivity (97.9)

その他の構成2

類似製品