AMD EPYC 9754 128-core SP5

Packing 128 Zen 4c cores and 256 threads on a 5nm process, this processor delivers a PassMark multi-core score of 115,016 for dense cloud-native workloads. Its 256MB of L3 cache and 12-channel DDR5 memory support provide massive throughput, while dual-socket capability allows scaling to 256 cores in a single server. This chip is best for hyperscale data centers running high-density containerized applications where core count per rack is the primary metric.

Cores 128
Threads 256
Boost Clock 3100 MHz
L3 Cache 256 MB
TDP 360 W
Socket SP5
AMD EPYC 9754 128-core SP5 cpu
76 総合スコア
他の国でも利用可能:

概要

The 30-Second Version

128 cores of Zen 4c fury with a PassMark score that makes other server chips look sleepy. Just make sure your power bill and cooling setup are ready for the 360W heat.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • 128 cores and 256 threads is best-in-class for dense server workloads 100th
  • PassMark multi-core of 115,016 is top of the charts 100th
  • 12-channel DDR5 with ECC support is a serious memory advantage 99th
  • PCIe 5.0 and dual-socket support make it scalable 88th

短所

  • 360W TDP means you need serious cooling and a beefy power budget
  • Single-thread performance is just okay at 2,403
  • No integrated graphics, so you'll need a separate GPU
  • Social proof is nearly nonexistent at the 12th percentile

実証データ

Performance

The multi-threaded numbers are absurd. 115,016 in PassMark puts this in the 99th percentile for multi-thread, and our AI and platform scores land at the very top of the charts. The 256MB of L3 cache and 12-channel DDR5 memory give it serious bandwidth for virtualization and dense container workloads. Single-thread is a different story. 2,403 puts it at the 67th percentile, which is fine but not exciting. The 3.1GHz boost clock is modest, and that's the trade-off for 128 cores on a 5nm process. Efficiency is the real weak spot at 39.7 out of 100. At 360W TDP and 400W turbo, this thing drinks power like it's going out of style.

Performance Percentiles

AI 99.6
Feature 77.4
Platform 99.9
Efficiency 88
Multi Thread 99.3
ユーザー評価 11.5
Affordability 1
Single Thread 68

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand AMD
Series EPYC
Model 9754
Codename Bergamo
Class server
Process 5

Cores & Clocks

Cores 128
P-cores 128
Threads 256
Base Clock 2250
Boost Clock 3100

Cache

L2 Cache 128
L3 Cache 256 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 115016
PassMark Single 2403

Memory

Memory Type DDR5
Max Speed 4800
Channels 12
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket SP5
PCIe 5
PCIe Lanes 128
TDP 360
Max Turbo Power 400
Unlocked No

vs Competition

The EPYC 9754 goes head to head with the SMC EPYC 9555P and HP Xeon P67080-B21 in the server space. The 9555P is a solid alternative if you want similar core counts with different power characteristics, but the 9754's 256MB of L3 cache gives it an edge in cache-sensitive workloads. Against the Xeon, the AMD chip generally wins on raw core count and memory bandwidth, though Intel's ecosystem support can be a factor in enterprise deployments. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and D&H Core i9 are desktop chips and honestly not in the same league for server tasks, so if you're cross-shopping those, you're looking at the wrong category.

Spec AMD EPYC 9754 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K SMC EPYC 9555P HP Xeon 6526Y MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores 128 24 64 16 - -
Threads 256 24 128 32 - -
Boost Clock Mhz 3100 5700 4400 3900 - -
L3 Cache Mb 256 36 256 37 - -
Tdp W 360 125 360 195 - -
Socket SP5 LGA 1851 AMD Socket SP5 LGA 4677 - -
Integrated Graphics - Intel Graphics - No - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti Threadユーザー評価AffordabilitySingle Thread
AMD EPYC 9754 99.677.499.98899.311.5168
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare 96.299.99697.296.490.418.399.9
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.377.496.789.799.400.585.9
HP Xeon 6526Y Compare 92.177.490.779.389.902.680.6
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare 85.820.717.566.697.106.498.4
Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X Compare 63.920.717.539.881.9040.585.7

価格

Value & Pricing

At $5,499 USD, this is a lot of money for a CPU. But if you're running a virtualization host or AI inference farm where core count is king, the price per core is actually reasonable. You're getting 128 cores for under $43 per core, which is hard to beat in the server space. Just don't buy this for a workstation unless you have a very specific reason.

最安 $5,499 1店舗で1件の価格
Amazon 1件の価格 最安 $5,499

Price History

$5,400 $5,450 $5,500 $5,550 $5,600 7月3日11月2日 $5,499

詳細情報

Overview

The AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128-core monster built for one thing: crushing heavily threaded server workloads. With 256 threads and a PassMark multi-core score of 115,016, this chip sits at the absolute top of our database for platform and AI performance. It's not a desktop toy, it's a data center workhorse that happens to be available in a tray pack if you know where to look.

Common Questions

Q: Can I use this in a regular desktop motherboard?

No. This is a Socket SP5 server chip. You need a server board with SP5 support, and those aren't cheap or small.

Q: Do I need a separate graphics card?

Yes. The EPYC 9754 has no integrated graphics, so you'll need a basic GPU just to get video output for setup and management.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

No, it's locked. You can push memory speeds beyond 4800 MT/s with the right modules, but the CPU multiplier itself is fixed.

Who Should Skip This

If you're building a gaming rig or a general-purpose workstation, this isn't it. Go get a Ryzen 9 or Core i9 instead. This chip is for people running dense virtualization, AI inference, or other heavily threaded server workloads where 256 threads actually matter.

Verdict

The EPYC 9754 is the right choice if you need maximum thread density and don't care about power draw. It's a specialized tool for specialized workloads, and in that role it's exceptional. For general-purpose servers or anything single-thread dependent, you're better off with a higher-clocked chip with fewer cores.

Usage Scores

総合 (75.5)AI/LLM (90.4)Budget (37.4)ゲーム (42.4)Server (94.1)Efficiency (40.5)Productivity (89)
  • 総合75.5
  • AI/LLM90.4
  • Budget37.4
  • ゲーム42.4
  • Server94.1
  • Efficiency40.5
  • Productivity89

類似製品