AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM4
The 8-core, 16-thread Zen+ architecture delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a 4.1GHz boost and a low 65W TDP, making it an efficient workhorse. Its unlocked multiplier and bundled Wraith Spire cooler offer accessible overclocking, while StoreMI technology adds a unique storage acceleration layer. This processor is best for budget-conscious builders assembling a capable workstation for video editing or 3D rendering on the AM4 platform.
एक नज़र में
The 30-Second Version
The Ryzen 7 2700 posts a PassMark multi-thread score of 15,580, putting it in the 70th percentile of our database. That's genuinely impressive for a 65W chip with 8 cores and 16 threads. But the user sentiment score sits at the 8th percentile, with recurring complaints about bent pins and missing coolers. Great silicon, risky buying experience.
Pros & Cons
खूबियाँ
- PassMark multi-thread score of 15,580 puts it in the 70th percentile 90th
- 8 cores and 16 threads at just 65W TDP 80th
- Efficiency score of 70.6 out of 100 is well above average 71st
- Socket AM4 compatibility opens up a huge motherboard ecosystem 70th
- Unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking via Ryzen Master
कमियाँ
- User sentiment score in the 8th percentile, one of the worst we've seen
- Single-thread score of 2,169 is only average
- Recurring reports of bent pins on arrival
- Stock Wraith Spire cooler runs hot under load
- No integrated graphics, you'll need a discrete GPU
मालिकों की राय
The Word on the Street
मालिकों की राय समय के साथ कैसे बदली
विशेषग्राहकों ने वास्तव में अपनी समीक्षाएँ कब लिखीं, इसके आधार पर - ताकि आप देख सकें कि शुरुआती तारीफ़ टिकी या नहीं।
4 तिथि-युक्त ग्राहक समीक्षाओं पर आधारित, कैलेंडर तिमाही के अनुसार समूहित। अवधि-वार विश्लेषण अंग्रेज़ी में है।
प्रमाण
Performance
The multi-thread PassMark score of 15,580 is the number that matters most here. That's well above average for desktop CPUs in our database, and it translates to smooth video renders, snappy code compiles, and zero drama when you've got 40 browser tabs plus a game running. The single-thread score of 2,169 is more middle of the pack, which is typical for Zen+. The 12nm process and 4.1GHz boost keep things respectable, but this isn't a chip that wins single-core shootouts.
The efficiency score of 70.6 out of 100 is a standout. At 65W TDP, you're getting 8 cores and 16 threads without needing a beefy cooler or a massive power supply. That's the Zen+ sweet spot. The platform score is also strong thanks to Socket AM4, which means you can drop this into a huge range of motherboards, from budget B450 boards to X470 and beyond. DDR4 support up to 64GB gives you plenty of headroom for memory-hungry workloads.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | Ryzen 7 |
| Model | 2700 |
| Codename | Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 12 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 8 |
| P-cores | 8 |
| Threads | 16 |
| Base Clock | 3200 |
| Boost Clock | 4100 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 4 |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 15580 |
| PassMark Single | 2169 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 2933 |
| Channels | 2 |
| Max Memory | 64 |
| ECC | No |
Platform & Power
| Socket | AM4 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 |
| TDP | 65 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
vs Competition
Against the Ryzen 5 2600, the 2700 wins on raw multi-thread muscle thanks to its 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads. That PassMark multi score of 15,580 is the differentiator for streaming and rendering. But the Ryzen 5 3600, despite having fewer cores, beats the 2700 in gaming because Zen 2's single-thread performance is just better. The 2700's single-thread score of 2,169 is the weak link there. Compared to something like the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, the 2700 gets absolutely demolished in single-thread and efficiency, but it's also a fraction of the price on the used market. The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is a server chip that's not even in the same conversation for desktop use.
| Spec | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | D&H Core i9 X-Series BX80673I99900X | ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX | be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 18 | 32 | 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 18 | 64 | 20 | 6 | 4 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 4100 | 5300 | 3500 | 4400 | 3600 | 3400 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 16 | 30 | 256 | 19.25 | 6 | 8 |
| Tdp W | 65 | 125 | 200 | 165 | 125 | 270 |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA 1851 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | LGA 2066 | AM3 | AM4 |
| Integrated Graphics | - | Intel Graphics | No | - | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| उत्पाद | AI | Feature | Platform | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Multi Thread | सामाजिक प्रमाण | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | 65.2 | 62.6 | 70.6 | 7.6 | 80.1 | 69.6 | 90.4 | 39.7 | 60.3 |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Compare | 93.3 | 97 | 96.6 | 50 | 93.2 | 92.8 | 60 | 45.6 | 98.4 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 99.1 | 90.9 | 76.4 | 0 | 97.4 | 99.1 | 0 | 88.4 | 88.7 |
| D&H Core i9 X-Series BX80673I99900X Compare | 80.6 | 62.6 | 81.4 | 0 | 63.7 | 76.4 | 78 | 27 | 70.3 |
| ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX Compare | 32.2 | 74.8 | 54 | 0 | 33.2 | 34.3 | 78 | 54.5 | 33.9 |
| be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare | 46 | 62.6 | 61 | 0 | 31.3 | 44.3 | 90.4 | 75.8 | 49.9 |
कीमत
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the map. In USD, listings range from $70 to $407 across five vendors. That's a $337 spread, which is wild for the same chip. If you can snag one near the $70 end, this is an absolute steal for an 8-core, 16-thread processor. At $407, you're paying way too much for 2018 silicon. The EUR listings are tighter, ranging from €529 to €590, but those prices are frankly absurd for this chip in 2025. The budget score of 64.4 out of 100 reflects the fact that used market pricing is where the real value lives. Newegg has the most listings, but you'll want to check the condition carefully given the bent pin complaints.
Amazon 1 ऑफ़र से $407
Price History
और पढ़ें
Overview
The Ryzen 7 2700 posts a PassMark multi-thread score of 15,580, which lands it in the 70th percentile of our database. That's a solid showing for a chip that's been around since 2018, and it means this thing still handles heavy multitasking and content creation without breaking a sweat. The 8 cores and 16 threads are the headline here, and they're backed by a 4.1GHz boost clock and 16MB of L3 cache. For a 65W TDP part, that's a lot of compute per watt.
But here's the rub. The user sentiment score sits at the 8th percentile, which is rough. A 4.7-star average across 4,742 reviews sounds great until you read the actual complaints. Bent pins on arrival, missing coolers, and high temps with the stock Wraith Spire are recurring themes. The silicon itself is fine. The buying experience? Not always.
Common Questions
Q: Does the Ryzen 7 2700 come with a cooler?
The retail box is supposed to include the Wraith Spire LED cooler, but multiple buyers report receiving the CPU without it, especially from third-party sellers. Check the listing carefully and be ready to return it if the cooler is missing. Even when it's included, the stock cooler runs hot under sustained load, so an aftermarket cooler is worth considering.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 2700 better than the Ryzen 5 2600?
For multi-threaded workloads like rendering, streaming, and heavy multitasking, yes. The 2700 has 8 cores and 16 threads versus the 2600's 6 cores and 12 threads, and its PassMark multi score of 15,580 reflects that advantage. For pure gaming, the difference is smaller since both chips share similar single-thread performance.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 2700 good for gaming in 2025?
It's serviceable but not ideal. The single-thread PassMark score of 2,169 is only average, which means CPU-bound games will leave performance on the table compared to newer chips like the Ryzen 5 3600. If gaming is your primary use case, a newer 6-core chip will often deliver better frame rates. The 2700 shines more in productivity and multitasking.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a gaming-first rig, look elsewhere. The single-thread score of 2,169 is mediocre, and newer 6-core chips like the Ryzen 5 3600 will beat it in CPU-bound games. If you're not comfortable inspecting CPU pins or dealing with potential returns, the bent pin complaints should scare you off. And if you need integrated graphics, this chip doesn't have them, so you'll need a discrete GPU no matter what. The server score of 51.8 out of 100 also means this isn't the chip for any kind of home lab or server build.
Verdict
The Ryzen 7 2700 is a weird case. The silicon is genuinely good. 8 cores, 16 threads, 65W TDP, and a multi-thread PassMark score that still holds up in 2025. If you find one for under $100 USD, it's a no-brainer for a budget productivity or streaming build. But the user sentiment score in the 8th percentile is a massive red flag. Bent pins, missing coolers, and high temps with the stock cooler are not one-off complaints. They're a pattern. Buy from a seller with a solid return policy, inspect the pins immediately, and budget for an aftermarket cooler if you plan to push it.