Sony MDR-E9LP
Snapshot
Avantages et inconvénients
Pros
- Strong sound (67th percentile) 67th
Cons
- Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (9th percentile)
- Below average mic (9th percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
What owners think
L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps
ExclusivitéD'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis — pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.
- Q1 202133/100
Reviews are polarized: one user with small ears loves the fit and durability, while two others report poor sound quality and for smaller earbuds that fall out.
- Fit: one user says great for small ears; others report earbuds fall out due to smaller shape.
- Sound quality is flat, bassless, and quiet; two users disappointed.
- Cable is thin and feels cheap, but one user reports 2-year durability.
- Comparison to older Sony models; one user misses old quality, another finds these ideal for small ears.
- Q4 202083/100
Buyers praise comfort, fit, durability, and sound quality for the price; a few note missing bass and lack of mic/controls.
- Exceptional comfort and fit, no headache or ear pain even after long use.
- Great durability; survive years of use and multiple washing machine cycles.
- Sound quality is good enough for the price but lacks bass depth.
- No mic or inline controls; some users consider this a drawback.
- Q3 202072/100
Reviews are mixed; budget-friendly with impressive durability and clear mids/highs, but lack bass, are too quiet for some, and have poor fit for small ears.
- Great durability, survives washing and drops.
- Sound quality praised for mids/highs but criticized for weak bass.
- Volume too low and earbuds fall out easily, especially for small ears.
- One user found them inferior to older Sony earbuds, calling them 'abysmal'.
- Q2 202050/100
Mixed reviews: some praise durability and sound for jogging, while others report poor bass and unfit for music.
- Durable and long-lasting earbuds survive drops and tangles over years.
- Lack of bass makes them unsuitable for music, only for podcasts/audiobooks.
- Sound quality criticized as inferior to older Sony Fontopia and Sennheiser models.
- Good fit for jogging and satisfactory bass in some units during exercise.
- Q1 201933/100
Mixed reviews: some praise value and laptop use, but others report crackling, poor sound quality, and disappointment with new model.
- Crackling and poor sound clarity compared to previous model
- Decent bass and good value for general use
- Better performance when used with a laptop or audio boosting features
- Terrible voice quality, worse than budget alternatives, environmentally wasteful
- Q4 201818/100
Buyers in Q4 2018 overwhelmingly complained about poor sound quality, no bass, flimsy build, and uncomfortable fit, with most regretting the purchase.
- Sound quality is very poor; no bass, tinny, and requires high volume.
- Build quality is cheap: thin plastic wires, curved jack, feels inferior to older models.
- Fit is uncomfortable: hard, ill-fitting earbuds that hurt the outer ear.
- Disappointment compared to older MDR models which were significantly better.
- Q3 201873/100
Buyers praised inexpensive high-quality sound and durability, but noted cord static and overly bright colors.
- Great sound quality for the low price.
- Comfortable fit and clear sound.
- Durable, lasting years despite heavy use.
- Touching the cord causes static noise.
- Q2 201852/100
Reviews in Q2 2018 are mixed: loyal users praise durability, but a new pair failed in a week and some find better value elsewhere.
- Durable, lasting years even after washer runs.
- One pair lost sound after only one week.
- Great for low-budget use, but critics find better options.
- Fit is comfortable for those who dislike round buds.
- Q1 201857/100
Most reviewers liked the low price, light fit, and open design, but a few reported poor bass, painful fit, or low build quality.
- Cheap, light, and comfortable for those who can get a good fit.
- Lack of bass and unnatural sound disappoint music listeners.
- Hard plastic hurts ears and won't stay in for some users.
- Great for travel because of tangle-resistant cords and low cost, but sound is only okay.
- Q2 201533/100
These earbuds are praised for durability and value by one long-term user, but others report poor sound quality, fit issues, and a faulty jack causing crackling.
- Survived washing machine and drops, works like new after a year.
- Jack-to-wire connection defect causes crackling on first use.
- Inferior sound quality and bass compared to older Sony model.
- Poor fit for smaller ears; in-ear style disliked.
- Q2 201350/100
Two positive reviews praise comfort, durability, and bass. Two negative reviews say the new model is worse than its predecessor, with poor audio quality and misleading specs.
- Great bass, secure fit in small ears, and durable construction.
- Long-lasting; some users had good experience with prior models and found these similar.
- New model inferior to the older E10LP, with noticeably worse audio quality.
- Misleading specs from Sony; earbuds don't match the claimed performance of predecessor.
D'après 81 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.
The proof
Performances
Caractéristiques techniques
Fiche technique complète
Design
| Form Factor | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | wired |
| Ear Tips | 2x earbuds |
Audio
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 13.5 |
| Freq Min | 18 |
| Freq Max | 20000 |
| Impedance | 16 |
| Sensitivity | 104 |
Noise Control
| ANC | No |
Earbud Battery
| Charging | proprietary |
Microphone
| Microphone | No |
Features
| Bone Conduction | No |
Face à la concurrence
| Spec | Sony MDR-E9LP | Baseus Bass BP1 Pro | Soundcore P30i A3959 | JLab GO Air POP GO Air POP | Apple Buds CMF Buds 2a Wireless Earbuds Active Noise Cancelling 42dB Hybrid ANC | Cillso H97 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear | in-ear | in-ear | in-ear | in-ear |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic | dynamic | dynamic | dynamic | dynamic |
| Wireless | - | true | true | true | true | true |
| Active Noise Cancellation | false | true | true | false | true | true |
| Bluetooth Version | - | 6.0 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life Hours | - | 12 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Case Battery Hours | - | 55 | 45 | 24 | 35.5 | 40 |
| Water Resistance | - | IP55 | IPX4 | IPX4 | IP54 | IP7 |
| Multipoint | - | true | false | true | true | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Anc | Mic | Build | Sound | Battery | Comfort | User Sentiment | Connectivity | Social Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sony MDR-E9LP | 28.9 | 9.1 | 33.3 | 67.4 | 46.9 | 28.2 | 6.1 | 8.7 | 37.4 |
| Baseus Bass BP1 Pro Compare | 96.7 | 96.8 | 91 | 87 | 95.9 | 70.6 | 91.9 | 98.4 | 74.6 |
| Soundcore P30i A3959 Compare | 96.7 | 90 | 78.6 | 66.8 | 92 | 70.6 | 79.1 | 84.6 | 86 |
| JLab GO Air POP GO Air POP Compare | 60.5 | 80.1 | 78.6 | 72.3 | 73.8 | 93.3 | 79.1 | 88.1 | 86 |
| Apple Buds CMF Buds 2a Wireless Earbuds Active Noise Cancelling 42dB Hybrid ANC Compare | 91.9 | 90 | 33.3 | 80.4 | 80.9 | 70.6 | 0 | 96.7 | 86 |
| Cillso H97 Compare | 79.3 | 90 | 33.3 | 84.9 | 86.2 | 70.6 | 97.3 | 94.6 | 100 |
Price
Rapport qualité-prix
Adorama 3 offres À partir de 10 $US
Amazon 1 offres À partir de 11 $US
Price History
Scores par usage
Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.