Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Score global
vs
Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

Swarovski
41 Score global

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Swarovski
41
Street
Sigma
86
Swarovski
51
Macro
Sigma
82
Swarovski
25
Portrait
Sigma
81
Swarovski
57
Travel
Sigma
80
Swarovski
30
Budget
Sigma
75
Swarovski
40
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Swarovski
42
Landscape
Sigma
71
Swarovski
29
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Swarovski
43

Spécifications

Sigma 207975Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm23 mm
Elements13
Groups10
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingApochromatic
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony ET2
FormatAPS-Cmicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.33 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Sigma 2079750.158score par dollar
vs
Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm0.086score par dollar

Sigma 207975 offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.8x meilleur

Verdict

Gagnant: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi