XFX Radeon RX 9070 QuickSilver 16GB GDDR6 Black
The RDNA 4 architecture and 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus deliver strong 4K gaming performance, backed by a 2700MHz boost clock and a 25422 PassMark score. AMD Infinity Cache and PCIe 5.0 support provide high bandwidth at low latency, while the triple-fan QuickSilver cooler maintains a 3.5-slot, 350mm design. This card is best for 4K gamers seeking high frame rates and ray tracing capabilities without stepping up to a flagship-tier price.
Sin precio actual de tiendas
Resumen
The 30-Second Version
The XFX QuickSilver RX 9070 is a 1440p powerhouse at $650 that overclocks to match the pricier XT model. 16GB of VRAM and cool, quiet operation make it a no-brainer for mid-range builds. Just make sure your case can fit a 350mm card.
Pros & Cons
Ventajas
- Overclocks to XT-level speeds with a simple undervolt 92nd
- 16GB VRAM gives it real longevity at 1440p 82nd
- Runs cool and quiet under load 82nd
- Excellent price-to-performance at $650 79th
Desventajas
- Physically huge at 350mm and 3.5 slots
- Thermal performance is below average
- Ray tracing is fine but not a selling point
- Prices have crept up since launch
Opinión de los propietarios
The Word on the Street
Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo
ExclusivaSegún cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.
Basado en 12 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.
Las pruebas
Performance
The RX 9070 sits at 25,398 in PassMark G3D, which lands it in the upper-middle of our database for raster performance. Not chart-topping, but solid. The 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus gives you 645 GB/s of bandwidth, and that VRAM buffer is a genuine advantage over cards shipping with less. Owners report hitting a stable 3200 MHz GPU clock after undervolting, which is XT-level territory. Ray tracing is decent but not the headline act, sitting around the 72nd percentile. The 245W TDP is reasonable for this class, though the thermal performance is the weak spot at the 35th percentile. It runs cool enough in practice, but this isn't a card that wins awards for heat management.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 9070 |
| Brand | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 4 |
| Class | consumer |
| Process | 4 |
Memory
| VRAM | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 256 |
| Bandwidth | 644.6 |
Compute
| Stream Processors | 3584 |
| Tensor Cores | 112 |
| RT Cores | 56 |
| Base Clock | 1440 |
| Boost Clock | 2700 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 72.25 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 36.13 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 25398 |
| GPU Compute | 14794 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 245 |
| Recommended PSU | 800 |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8pin |
| Cooler | Fan |
| Fans | 3 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 |
| DisplayPort | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 8K (4320p) |
Physical
| Length | 350 |
| Slot Width | 3.5 |
| Form Factor | Full Height |
| Weight | 2.2 kg / 4.9 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| Upscaling | AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 4 |
| VR Ready | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 |
vs Competition
Against the RTX 5070 Ti, the RX 9070 trades blows depending on the game. The 5070 Ti has better ray tracing and DLSS, but it also costs significantly more. The RTX 5080 cards from ASUS, Gigabyte, and ZOTAC are in a different performance tier entirely, but you're paying hundreds more for that privilege. The Sapphire NITRO+ is the closest AMD competitor, and it's a toss-up on cooling versus price. For pure raster performance per dollar, the XFX QuickSilver is hard to beat. If you care about ray tracing or AI workloads, NVIDIA's cards pull ahead, but for traditional gaming, this AMD option is the smarter buy.
| Spec | XFX Radeon RX 9070 QuickSilver | Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ASUS PRIME PRIME-RTX5080-16G | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Radeon RX 9070 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 16GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2700 | 2588 | 2482 | 2640 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 245 | 300 | 300 | 360 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Connectivity | Valoración social | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XFX Radeon RX 9070 QuickSilver | 81.6 | 72.5 | 75.7 | 68.6 | 78.8 | 66.2 | 34.3 | 91.9 | 66.4 | 81.9 | 64.3 | 0 |
| Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD Compare | 79.2 | 88.3 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 88 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 85.9 | 72.9 | 94 | 95.5 | 21.9 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 88 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 80.2 | 72.9 | 94 | 88.8 | 21.1 |
| ASUS PRIME PRIME-RTX5080-16G Compare | 85.2 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.6 | 57.8 | 94 | 99.1 | 20.7 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.2 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 99.4 | 57.8 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.2 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.2 | 91.7 | 83.9 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 85.9 | 52.7 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 17.6 |
Precio
Value & Pricing
At $650 USD, this is one of the best value propositions in the current GPU market. You're getting 16GB of VRAM, solid 1440p performance, and overclocking headroom that essentially gives you a free tier upgrade. The 84.4/100 budget score in our database backs that up. The only wrinkle is that prices have been raised since launch, and the card is physically massive, so make sure your case can handle it. But if you're building a mid-range rig right now, this is the card to beat.
Best Buy 2 ofertas Desde 650 US$
Price History
Leer más
Overview
The XFX QuickSilver RX 9070 is the card that makes you wonder why you'd spend more. It's a 16GB RDNA 4 GPU that punches way above its $650 price tag, and owners are overclocking it to match the pricier XT variant. That's the kind of value that gets our attention.
XFX didn't reinvent the wheel here. They took AMD's new architecture, strapped a chunky triple-fan cooler to it, and let the silicon do the talking. The result is a card that handles 1440p gaming with ease and even dips into 4K territory when you're feeling ambitious.
Common Questions
Q: Can this card handle 4K gaming?
It can handle 4K in many titles, but it's really built for 1440p. At 4K you'll need to dial back settings in demanding games, though the 16GB of VRAM helps avoid texture-related stutters.
Q: Is the RX 9070 worth buying over the RX 9070 XT?
For most people, yes. The non-XT model overclocks to match XT performance with a simple undervolt, and the price difference is significant. Unless you find the XT on sale, the standard 9070 is the smarter buy.
Q: Will this fit in a mid-tower case?
It depends on your specific case. At 350mm long and 3.5 slots thick, you'll need a case with good clearance. Measure your available space before buying, especially if you have front-mounted radiators or drive cages.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're building a small form factor PC, because a 350mm card that takes 3.5 slots is going to be a nightmare to fit. Also skip it if ray tracing or AI workloads matter to you, since NVIDIA's RTX cards are meaningfully better in those areas. And if you already own a card from the last generation like an RX 7800 XT or RTX 4070, the upgrade isn't dramatic enough to justify the cost.
Verdict
If you're gaming at 1440p and want maximum frames per dollar, buy this card. It's the sweet spot of AMD's RDNA 4 lineup, with enough VRAM to stay relevant for years and overclocking headroom that makes the XT variant look like a bad deal. The size is the main thing to check before buying, and if you're into heavy ray tracing or AI workloads, you might want to look at NVIDIA instead. But for the vast majority of gamers, this is the card that makes the most sense right now.
Usage Scores
- General71.2
- AI/LLM62.1
- Budget51.3
- Gaming 4k68.9
- Ray Tracing69.8
- Workstation63.9
- Gaming 1080p69.5
- Gaming 1440p69.2
- Content Creation65.2