NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB GDDR6 workstation

The TITAN RTX packs 24GB of GDDR6 and lands in the 92nd percentile for AI workloads, making it a budget beast for deep learning. But its PassMark G3D score of 13660 puts it in the 31st percentile for raster, so gaming is rough. It runs hot, costs too much, and only makes sense if you specifically need that VRAM.

Let's talk about what this card actually does well. The 24GB of GDDR6 is the headline here, and it's why this card still shows up in AI and rendering rigs. Our database puts it in the 91st percentile for VRAM capacity, which means it out-muscles most modern cards when it comes to fitting large models or complex scenes in memory. The 577 Tensor cores and 72 RT cores were a big deal when Turing launched, and they still hold up for certain workloads. But the PassMark G3D score of 13660 is a reality check. That's 31st percentile for raster, which means a mid-range RTX 4070 will embarrass it in traditional gaming. The 1770MHz boost clock sounds fine, but Turing's architecture is showing its age. For AI and compute, the 92nd percentile ranking is legit. For gaming, this thing is a relic with a fancy cooler.

Stacked against the current crop, the TITAN RTX looks rough. The ASUS PRIME RTX 5080 and Gigabyte AORUS RTX 5080 both crush it in raster, compute, and efficiency, though they cost more. The MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti and ZOTAC SOLID RTX 5070 Ti offer better gaming performance at a lower price, but they only have 16GB of VRAM. That's the trade-off. The TITAN RTX wins on memory capacity, but loses on pretty much everything else. If you're doing AI work that needs 24GB and you're on a tight budget, this card is a weirdly sensible choice. If you're gaming, any of those competitors will serve you better.

The TITAN RTX is not a good value in 2025. Our database puts it in the 22nd percentile for affordability, and that's being generous. You can find it for around 258,618 JPY in Japan or 40,999 MXN in Mexico, but those prices are all over the place and neither is a bargain. For the same money, you could grab a used RTX 3090 with similar VRAM and way better raster performance. The TITAN RTX made sense when it launched as a prosumer card, but now it's a niche purchase for people who specifically need 24GB of VRAM on a budget and don't care about gaming.

The NVIDIA TITAN RTX is a weird beast in 2025. It's got 24GB of GDDR6 and 4609 CUDA cores, which puts it in the 91st percentile for VRAM and 92nd for AI workloads in our database. That's genuinely impressive for a Turing card. But the PassMark G3D score of 13660 tells a different story, landing it in the 31st percentile for raster performance. This card was built for workstations and AI tinkering, not for chasing frames in Cyberpunk.

Skip this card if you're a gamer. The 31st percentile raster performance means you'll be turning down settings on anything modern, and the 7th percentile thermals mean you'll be fighting heat the whole time. Also skip it if you don't have a beefy PSU or good case airflow, because this thing runs hot and owners report coil whine under load. And if you're expecting a bargain, the 22nd percentile affordability ranking should tell you this isn't the deal it might look like at first glance.

The TITAN RTX is a one-trick pony, but it's a pretty good trick. The 24GB of VRAM and 92nd percentile AI ranking make it a legitimate option for budget deep learning and rendering rigs. But the 31st percentile raster performance, 7th percentile thermals, and 22nd percentile affordability mean it's a tough sell for anyone else. If you need VRAM on the cheap and can handle the heat, it's worth a look. If you want to play games, buy something else.