AMD A6-Series A6-8570 2-core AM4
The dual-core Excavator architecture on a 28nm process with a 3.8GHz boost clock delivers basic desktop functionality on the AM4 socket. Its integrated Radeon R5 graphics and 65W TDP allow for simple video playback and display output without a dedicated GPU. This processor is best for users building an ultra-budget office PC or a basic home theater system where cost is the primary constraint.
Resumen
The 30-Second Version
A $59 AM4 chip that's slower than a used Ryzen 3 and hotter than it has any right to be. Buy it only if your motherboard is empty and your wallet is emptier.
Pros & Cons
Ventajas
- Dirt cheap at $59 88th
- AM4 socket means a real upgrade path exists 77th
- Radeon R5 iGPU handles basic display duties
- 88th percentile affordability, it's basically free
Desventajas
- Two cores in 2025 is a punishment
- 65W TDP for this performance is embarrassing
- No L3 cache at all
- Bottom quarter multi-thread performance
Las pruebas
Performance
The PassMark numbers tell the whole story. 1902 multi and 1603 single put this thing in the bottom quarter of our database for multi-thread work, and the single-thread score is mediocre at best. What surprised us most is the efficiency score. 28.9 out of 100 is rough, and that 65W TDP for two cores is basically a space heater doing math. The Radeon R5 iGPU is fine for desktop use and old games, but don't expect it to decode modern video without complaining. The 3.8GHz boost sounds okay until you remember this is Excavator architecture, which was already behind when it launched.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | A6 |
| Model | A6-8570 |
| Codename | Alder Lake-U |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 28 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 2 |
| P-cores | 1 |
| E-cores | 4 |
| Threads | 2 |
| Base Clock | 3500 |
| Boost Clock | 3800 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 1 |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 1902 |
| PassMark Single | 1603 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Channels | 2 |
| ECC | No |
Platform & Power
| Socket | AM4 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 |
| TDP | 65 |
| Max Turbo Power | 29 |
| Unlocked | No |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R5 series |
vs Competition
Against the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, this is not a competition. The Ultra 5 is a modern chip with real cores and real performance. The A6-8570 loses in every metric that matters. The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is an interesting comparison because it's also old, but that Xeon has more cores and server-grade reliability. The be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 isn't even a CPU, it's a cooler, which tells you how weird this product category gets. If you're cross-shopping this against anything modern, stop. Buy the modern thing.
| Spec | AMD A6-Series A6-8570 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225 | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr | be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | DAKboard CPU v4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 10 | 32 | - | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 10 | 64 | - | 4 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3800 | 4900 | 3500 | - | 3400 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 8 | 20 | 256 | - | 8 | - |
| Tdp W | 65 | 65 | 200 | - | 270 | - |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA 1851 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | - | AM4 | BGA |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R5 series | Intel Graphics | No | - | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Valoración social | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD A6-Series A6-8570 | 23.3 | 55.1 | 76.5 | 29.7 | 24.6 | 11.5 | 88.2 | 38 |
| Intel Core Ultra 5 225 Compare | 85.1 | 90.9 | 90.8 | 95.7 | 85.1 | 73.5 | 57.3 | 95 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 97.8 | 90.9 | 76.9 | 31.5 | 47.4 | 0 | 88 | 51.6 |
| PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr Compare | 50 | 20.6 | 17.4 | 29.2 | 67.8 | 0 | 87.3 | 45 |
| be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare | 44.9 | 62.7 | 61.2 | 26.6 | 46.3 | 90.3 | 76.1 | 50.9 |
| DAKboard CPU v4 Compare | 8.5 | 20.6 | 17.4 | 8.6 | 9.9 | 58.6 | 55.3 | 17 |
Precio
Value & Pricing
At $59, it's cheap. But cheap and good value are different things. You can find used Ryzen 3 1200s or even 2200Gs for similar money on the used market, and those will run circles around this thing. The only reason to buy this is if you need a new-in-box AM4 chip right now and literally cannot spend more. Even then, I'd check a local electronics recycler first.
Amazon 1 oferta Desde 59 US$
Price History
Leer más
Overview
The AMD A6-8570 is a budget AM4 chip that exists for one reason: to get a display on screen without spending real money. It's a dual-core Excavator part from 2016 wearing a fresh listing, and at $59 it's competing with used office pulls that absolutely destroy it. The one thing to know? This is not a CPU you buy for performance. It's a CPU you buy because your motherboard needs something cheap and you've already talked yourself out of better options.
Common Questions
Q: Can this run Windows 11?
Officially, no. Windows 11 requires an 8th gen Intel or Ryzen 2000 series or newer. This Excavator chip isn't on the supported list. You can probably force it with workarounds, but you'll be fighting updates forever. Stick with Windows 10 or Linux.
Q: Is this good for gaming?
For anything made before 2015, maybe. The Radeon R5 iGPU can handle old titles and indie games at low settings. For anything modern, absolutely not. This is a desktop productivity chip at best, and even then it's going to struggle with multiple browser tabs.
Q: What's the upgrade path from this?
The AM4 socket is the best thing about this chip. You can drop in a Ryzen 5 3600 or even a 5600G later and get a massive performance jump without changing motherboards. Just make sure your board's BIOS supports the newer chips before you buy.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a PC for anything beyond basic web browsing and document editing, skip this. If you want to game, skip this. If you care about power efficiency, skip this. Go find a used Ryzen 3 2200G or spend a bit more on a Ryzen 5 3600. Your future self will thank you.
Verdict
Don't buy this unless you have a very specific reason. It's a 2016-era dual-core with no L3 cache, a 65W TDP, and performance that belongs in a museum. The AM4 socket is the only redeeming quality, and that just means you can replace it with something better later. If you need a cheap AM4 chip, buy used. If you need a new chip, spend a little more and get a Ryzen 3 or used Ryzen 5. This thing is a stopgap, not a solution.
Usage Scores
- General27.3
- AI/LLM25
- Budget50.7
- Gaming26.3
- Server24.1
- Efficiency28.9
- Productivity28