Nextbase iQ NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back
The 2K recording and SmartSense Parking mode provide clear rear footage and impact detection even when the vehicle is off. Its Roadwatch Ai and Emergency SOS Response offer active driver alerts and automatic crash notification, adding a layer of safety beyond simple recording. This camera is best for existing Nextbase iQ dash cam owners seeking a seamless rear expansion for comprehensive, AI-enhanced vehicle surveillance.
Sin precio actual de tiendas
Resumen
Ventajas y desventajas
Ventajas
- Strong affordability (65th percentile) 65th
Desventajas
- Below average build (0th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (17th percentile)
- Below average social proof (18th percentile)
- Below average video (25th percentile)
Las pruebas
Rendimiento
Especificaciones
Especificaciones completas
Build
| Weight | 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs |
Frente a la competencia
| Spec | Nextbase iQ NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back | Nikon Z Z50 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix G DMC-G85MK | Sony Alpha a6300 | Canon EOS R50 V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | - | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | - | 20.9MP aps-c | 20.3MP micro-four-thirds | 16MP micro-four-thirds | 24.2MP aps-c | 24.2MP aps-c |
| AF Points | - | 209 | 121 | 49 | 425 | 4503 |
| Burst FPS | - | 11 | 15 | 10 | 11 | 15 |
| Video | - | 4K @30fps | 4K @30fps | 4K @30fps | 4K @30fps | 4K @60fps |
| IBIS | false | false | true | true | false | false |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 100 | 395 | 498 | 503 | 116 | 322 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Valoración social | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nextbase iQ NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back | 38.3 | 39.9 | 0.2 | 33.9 | 24.6 | 32.9 | 47.1 | 29.6 | 17.2 | 18.2 | 65.4 | 35.9 |
| Nikon Z Z50 Compare | 87.4 | 87.7 | 92.4 | 82.8 | 73.6 | 86.9 | 47.1 | 87.6 | 91.4 | 94.2 | 44.8 | 35.9 |
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Compare | 85.4 | 87.7 | 93.3 | 90.4 | 62.8 | 50.6 | 47.1 | 87.6 | 90 | 85.1 | 54.7 | 89.2 |
| Panasonic Lumix G DMC-G85MK Compare | 78.7 | 83.4 | 91.3 | 85.7 | 69.5 | 13.7 | 98.9 | 87.6 | 79.6 | 89.6 | 53 | 89.2 |
| Sony Alpha a6300 Compare | 92.3 | 87.7 | 89.8 | 77.6 | 83.5 | 92 | 93 | 72.6 | 88.7 | 81.1 | 47.4 | 35.9 |
| Canon EOS R50 V Compare | 99.8 | 39.9 | 13.3 | 80.7 | 85.1 | 92 | 94.1 | 87.6 | 96.1 | 85.1 | 42.7 | 35.9 |
Precio
Relación calidad-precio
Seguimos los precios de este producto desde el 12 may 2026. El gráfico aparecerá cuando tengamos más datos.
Puntuaciones por uso
- General9.5
- Video11.4
- Travel6.4
- Youtube8.4
- Beginner31.2
- Vlogging6.7
- Streaming8.7
- Photography11.3
- Wedding Events10.7
- Sports Wildlife14.5
- Product Photography10.9
Pronto habrá un análisis completo. Las especificaciones, puntuaciones, precios y gráficos de arriba siempre están actualizados.