New

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

★★★★★ 4.7 (611)

The Samsung Phoenix controller and V-NAND TLC deliver 3500 MB/s reads and 3300 MB/s writes, with 600K random read IOPS for demanding workloads. Its Dynamic Thermal Guard prevents performance drops during sustained transfers, and the 600 TBW endurance rating supports long-term use. Best for workstation builders and 4K/3D content designers who need consistent high-speed storage for large files.

Capacity 1TB
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Read Speed 3,500 MB/s
NAND TLC
DRAM Cache Yes
Endurance 600 TBW
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 ssd
73 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The 970 EVO Plus delivers 600K random read IOPS and 600 TBW endurance, both top tier numbers. Sequential speeds of 3,500 MB/s are average for PCIe 3.0 but lag far behind Gen 4 competitors. At USD 300 it's worth considering, at USD 349 it's overpriced.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 600K random read IOPS, top tier responsiveness 97th
  • 600 TBW endurance rating, 86th percentile 87th
  • DRAM cache and Phoenix controller keep latency low 87th
  • 5-year warranty with 1.5M hour MTBF 74th
  • Hardware encryption built in

Cons

  • PCIe 3.0 caps sequential reads at 3,500 MB/s
  • Portable use score of 16.4 out of 100
  • Affordability sits at the 33rd percentile
  • No heatsink included for sustained workloads

The proof

Performance

Let's talk about those random IOPS, because that's the number that actually matters for real-world snappiness. 600K random read IOPS at QD32 puts this drive in the top tier of our database, and it's the main reason the 970 EVO Plus still feels quick years after launch. The Samsung Phoenix controller and DRAM cache keep latency low, and the TLC V-NAND holds up well under sustained loads. Sequential speeds of 3,500 MB/s read and 3,300 MB/s write are fine for PCIe 3.0, but they're the drive's most average metric at the 64th percentile.

For workstations, this drive scores 73.8 out of 100 in our testing, which is solid. Laptops get a 70.9. The Dynamic Thermal Guard does its job keeping temperatures in check, though the drive can still get warm under heavy sustained writes. If you're moving massive files around all day, a Gen 4 drive with a beefier heatsink might serve you better. But for mixed workloads, the 970 EVO Plus holds its own.

Performance Percentiles

Speed 63.6
Random 87.4
Feature 97.3
Capacity 54.9
Endurance 74.2
Social Proof 86.8
Affordability 33.5

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 1000
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4
Protocol NVMe
PCIe Generation 3
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 3500
Sequential Write (MB/s) 3300
Random Read (IOPS) 600000
Random Write (IOPS) 550000

Hardware

NAND TLC
DRAM Cache Yes
Controller Samsung Phoenix

Reliability

Endurance (TBW) 600
MTBF (hours) 1500000
Warranty (years) 5

Features

Heatsink No
Hardware Encryption Yes

vs Competition

Against the Western Digital Black SN850X and Crucial T500, the 970 EVO Plus gives up a lot of sequential throughput. Those Gen 4 drives push past 7,000 MB/s reads, more than double what Samsung's PCIe 3.0 interface allows. But the 970 EVO Plus fights back on endurance, its 600 TBW rating beats many competitors in this price bracket. The Kingston Fury Renegade and Seagate FireCuda 530R also offer Gen 4 speeds with similar or better endurance, which makes the Samsung a harder sell at the top of its price range. If your motherboard only supports PCIe 3.0, the 970 EVO Plus is still one of the best options available. If you have a Gen 4 slot, the SN850X or T500 will give you more headroom for similar money.

Spec Samsung 970 EVO Plus Crucial T500 Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/1T0 MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO XPG GAMMIX S70 Blade AGAMMIXS70B-2T-CS Team Group MP44
Capacity 1TB 2TB 1TB 1TB 2TB 2TB
Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 3.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 3,500 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 14,200 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache true true true true true false
Endurance 600 TBW 1200 TBW 1000 TBW 3000 TBW 1480 TBW 1000 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityEnduranceSocial ProofAffordability
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 63.687.497.354.974.286.833.5
Crucial T500 Compare 93.896.598.878.382.99519.9
Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/1T0 Compare 97.198.790.554.992.386.825.2
MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO Compare 93.880.893.654.998.79544.3
XPG GAMMIX S70 Blade AGAMMIXS70B-2T-CS Compare 92.690.293.678.377.677.330.2
Team Group MP44 Compare 93.888.453.778.381.686.831

Price

Value & Pricing

Pricing is a bit of a mess right now. US listings range from USD 300 to USD 349, a USD 49 spread across three vendors. That's a meaningful gap for a PCIe 3.0 drive in a market where Gen 4 options are getting cheaper by the month. At USD 300, the 970 EVO Plus makes a decent case for itself if you value endurance and random performance over raw sequential speed. At USD 349, you're paying a premium for the Samsung name and the 600 TBW rating. The affordability percentile sits at 33rd, which tells you this drive is priced above most of its peers. Shop around before you buy, and don't pay the top of that range.

From $299 3 offers across 2 retailers

Price History

New Open Box / Refurbished
$100 $200 $300 $400 Nov 8Nov 9 $299

Read more

Overview

The Samsung 970 EVO Plus hits 3,500 MB/s sequential reads and 3,300 MB/s writes, which puts it in the middle of the pack for speed at the 64th percentile. But raw throughput isn't the whole story here. The random performance is where this drive earns its keep, with 600K read IOPS and 550K write IOPS landing at the 87th percentile. That's the kind of responsiveness you feel when loading apps, scrubbing through timelines, or juggling a dozen browser tabs while a game updates in the background.

Endurance is another bright spot. Samsung rates this 1TB drive for 600 TBW, which sits at the 86th percentile and means you could write over 300GB every single day for five years before hitting the warranty limit. The 1.5 million hour MTBF and 5-year warranty back that up. It's a PCIe 3.0 drive, so it won't touch Gen 4 speeds, but for most people the difference between 3,500 MB/s and 7,000 MB/s is a number on a spec sheet, not something you'll notice day to day.

Common Questions

Q: Is the 970 EVO Plus fast enough for gaming?

For gaming, yes. The 600K random read IOPS at the 87th percentile means game loads and texture streaming feel snappy. Sequential reads of 3,500 MB/s won't bottleneck any current game, even if Gen 4 drives are technically faster on paper.

Q: How long will this drive last?

Samsung rates it for 600 TBW, which lands at the 86th percentile for endurance. That translates to roughly 328GB of writes per day for 5 years. The 1.5 million hour MTBF and 5-year warranty back up the durability claims.

Q: Will this work in a laptop?

It's an M.2 2280 form factor, so it fits most modern laptops with an M.2 slot. Our laptop score is 70.9 out of 100, which is solid. Just check that your laptop supports PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe, and keep in mind the drive can run warm under sustained loads.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you have a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 motherboard and want maximum throughput. The 3,500 MB/s sequential read cap is the drive's biggest limitation, sitting at the 64th percentile for speed. Portable users should also look elsewhere, the 16.4 out of 100 portable score is one of the weakest we've seen. And if you're price sensitive, the 33rd percentile affordability ranking means you're paying extra for endurance and the Samsung brand rather than raw performance. Gen 4 drives like the SN850X or T500 deliver double the sequential speed for similar or less money.

Verdict

The 970 EVO Plus is a drive that aged well in the ways that matter most. Random performance and endurance are both excellent, and the 5-year warranty gives you peace of mind. But it's a PCIe 3.0 drive competing against Gen 4 hardware at Gen 4 prices. At USD 300 it's a reasonable buy for older systems or anyone who prioritizes endurance. At USD 349, you should look elsewhere. The 600 TBW rating and 600K random read IOPS are genuinely impressive, but they don't fully offset the speed ceiling.

Usage Scores

Overall (73.2)Budget (74.4)Gaming (72.8)Laptop (76)Console (35.6)Portable (18.3)Workstation (74.7)

Other Configurations2

Similar Products