Neu Im Angebot 2%

Silicon Power UD90 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

★★★★☆ 4.3 (91)

The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface delivers up to 5,000 MB/s reads and 4,800 MB/s writes, nearly doubling PCIe 3.0 bandwidth for faster downloads and file transfers. SLC caching and LDPC error correction keep performance steady during heavy multitasking, while the 600 TBW endurance and 5-year warranty back long-term reliability. Best for budget-conscious builders upgrading a gaming or workstation rig who want PCIe 4.0 speed without paying a premium.

Capacity 1TB
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 4.0 x4
Read Speed 5,000 MB/s
NAND TLC
Endurance 600 TBW
Silicon Power UD90 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 ssd
62 Gesamtbewertung
Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

The 30-Second Version

The UD90 delivers 5,000 MB/s reads and 4,800 MB/s writes at a price that undercuts most competitors by a wide margin. The 600 TBW endurance rating and 5-year warranty are genuinely strong. But a 10th percentile user sentiment score driven by overheating and failure reports makes this a high-risk, high-reward purchase.

Pros & Cons

Vorteile

  • 5,000 MB/s read and 4,800 MB/s write at 75th percentile speed 86th
  • 600 TBW endurance rating puts it at the 86th percentile 79th
  • 5-year warranty is longer than most budget drives 75th
  • Supports RAID and E2E data protection
  • Works with PS5 according to multiple owners

Nachteile

  • User sentiment score of 52/100 lands at the 10th percentile
  • Multiple reports of overheating even at idle
  • Documented drive failures and data corruption after months of use
  • Random performance is only 62nd percentile, middle of the pack
  • DRAM-less design limits sustained heavy workloads

Was Besitzer sagen

The Word on the Street

4.3/5 (91 reviews)
👍 Many owners praise the price-to-performance ratio, saying the speed and capacity are hard to beat at this price point.
👎 A recurring complaint is that drives run hot even at idle, with some owners seeing SMART temperature warnings.
👎 Multiple users report drives failing or corrupting data after several months of use, pointing to inconsistent quality control.

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer hat sich mit der Zeit verbessert
52/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysemittlere Konfidenz · 25 Quellen · Nov. 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '23: 1.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '24: 2.0★ · 1 BewertungQ3 '24: 3.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '24: 1.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '25: 1.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '26: 3.1★ · 25 Bewertungen (ca. Datum)111112125Q1 '23Q2 '23Q4 '23Q1 '24Q3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q1 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der BewertungenGeschätztes Datum

Basierend auf 33 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Performance

5,000 MB/s sequential read and 4,800 MB/s write is genuinely quick. That's 75th percentile speed in our database, which means it's well above average, and it's roughly double what you'd get from a PCIe 3.0 drive. The TLC NAND and SLC caching help keep those numbers honest under bursty workloads, and the DRAM-less design doesn't cripple it the way it does some budget drives. For game loads, large file transfers, and general snappiness, this thing delivers. Random performance is more of a mixed bag at the 62nd percentile. Solid, but not a standout. If you're hammering it with tons of small file operations all day, you'll notice it's not in the same league as the Samsung 990 PRO or Crucial T500. The heatsink version helps with thermals, but multiple owners report the drive runs hot even at idle, which is a red flag for long-term stability.

Performance Percentiles

Speed 75.4
Random 61.7
Feature 79
Capacity 55.4
User Sentiment 9.9
Endurance 86
Nutzerresonanz 54.8
Affordability 53.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 1000
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 4.0 x4
Protocol NVMe
PCIe Generation 4
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 5000
Sequential Write (MB/s) 4800

Hardware

NAND TLC
DRAM Cache No

Reliability

Endurance (TBW) 600
MTBF (hours) 1500000
Warranty (years) 5

Features

Heatsink Yes

vs Competition

Against the Samsung 990 PRO and Crucial T500, the UD90 loses on random performance and reliability, but it wins on price. The 990 PRO is faster across the board and has a much stronger track record, but you'll pay a premium for that peace of mind. The Kingston Fury Renegade offers better sustained write performance and better thermals, though again at a higher cost. The Western Digital SN8100 and Lexar NM1090 PRO both outclass the UD90 in speed and endurance, but if you're on a strict budget and willing to roll the dice on quality control, the UD90 undercuts them all. The real question is whether saving $50 to $100 upfront is worth the documented failure risk.

Spec Silicon Power UD90 Samsung 990 PRO Crucial T500 Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Team Group MP44
Capacity 1TB 2TB 2TB 2TB 2TB 4TB
Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 14,000 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache false true true true true false
Endurance 600 TBW 1200 TBW 1200 TBW 2000 TBW 1400 TBW 2000 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEnduranceNutzerresonanzAffordability
Silicon Power UD90 75.461.77955.49.98654.853.6
Samsung 990 PRO Compare 93.797.498.978.5798695.320.7
Crucial T500 Compare 9496.998.978.5798395.319.6
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare 93.394.493.978.567.194.195.316
Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Compare 98.198.597.578.5091.151.924.1
Team Group MP44 Compare 93.588.753.792.67977.187.115.5

Preis

Value & Pricing

The price spread here is worth paying attention to. You'll find this drive listed anywhere from $173 to $251 across US retailers, and that $78 gap is the difference between a steal and a shrug. At the low end, you're getting 5,000 MB/s reads and a 600 TBW endurance rating for less than most PCIe 4.0 drives with similar specs. At the high end, you're dangerously close to territory where more reliable options start looking tempting. The 5-year warranty softens the risk somewhat, but a warranty doesn't bring back lost data when a drive corrupts itself.

Ab 173 $ 1 Angebot bei 1 Händler
Newegg 1 Angebot Ab 173 $

Wir verfolgen die Preise für dieses Produkt seit dem 8. Nov. 2026. Das Diagramm erscheint, sobald mehr Daten vorliegen.

Mehr erfahren

Overview

The Silicon Power UD90 hits 5,000 MB/s read and 4,800 MB/s write, which puts it in the top quarter of drives in our database for speed. That's a lot of throughput for a drive that costs between $173 and $251 depending on where you look. On paper, this is the budget PCIe 4.0 drive that makes you wonder why anyone pays more. But here's the thing. User sentiment sits at the 10th percentile, which is one of the worst we've seen. Owners love the price-to-performance ratio, but a meaningful chunk report overheating, corruption, and outright drive failures after a few months. The specs say one thing, the real-world reliability record says another, and that gap is the whole story here.

Common Questions

Q: Does the UD90 support RAID?

Yes, the UD90 supports RAID for data protection in case of a drive failure. It also includes E2E data protection for transfer integrity. That said, RAID won't help you if the drive itself overheats and corrupts data, which is the more common complaint from owners.

Q: What are the actual read and write speeds?

The UD90 is rated for up to 5,000 MB/s sequential read and 4,800 MB/s sequential write. That puts it at the 75th percentile for speed in our database, which is well above average. Random performance is more modest at the 62nd percentile, so expect solid but not exceptional small-file performance.

Q: Can I use this drive in an external enclosure?

Yes, the UD90 can be installed in an external M.2 enclosure. It doesn't come with one, so you'll need to buy that separately. Just keep in mind that the drive already runs hot according to multiple owners, and an enclosure with poor airflow could make that worse.

Who Should Skip This

If you're storing anything you can't afford to lose, look elsewhere. The 10th percentile user sentiment score isn't just a number, it's a pattern of overheating, corruption, and dead drives. Content creators, anyone running a workstation, or anyone who treats their storage as anything more than a game library should spend the extra money on a Samsung 990 PRO or Crucial T500. The UD90's 600 TBW endurance rating looks great on paper, but endurance ratings don't matter if the drive cooks itself before you get there.

Verdict

The UD90 is a frustrating product. The specs are legitimately good for the price, the endurance rating is impressive at the 86th percentile, and the 5-year warranty shows Silicon Power is willing to stand behind it. But when user sentiment ranks at the 10th percentile and owners are reporting overheating, corruption, and dead drives after a few months, the value proposition gets shaky. If you get a good unit, you'll love it. If you don't, you'll be reinstalling your OS and restoring from backup. That's a gamble we can't fully endorse, even at $173.

Usage Scores

Gesamt (62.1)Budget (76.9)Gaming (63.3)Laptop (55.7)Console (51.4)Portable (16.1)Workstation (63)
  • Gesamt62.1
  • Budget76.9
  • Gaming63.3
  • Laptop55.7
  • Console51.4
  • Portable16.1
  • Workstation63

Weitere Konfigurationen3

Ähnliche Produkte