Seagate FireCuda X1070 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong random (92nd percentile) 92nd
- Strong endurance (89th percentile) 89th
- Strong speed (83rd percentile) 83rd
Nachteile
- Below average social proof (6th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (9th percentile)
- Below average feature (15th percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Drive
| Capacity | 1000 |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 7200 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 6000 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 850000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 900000 |
Hardware
| NAND | QLC |
| DRAM Cache | No |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 600 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1800000 |
| Warranty (years) | 5 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Seagate FireCuda X1070 | Samsung 990 PRO | Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 | Crucial T500 | Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G | Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1TB | 2TB | 4TB | 2TB | 2TB | 2TB |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 7,200 MB/s | 7,450 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,000 MB/s |
| Nand Type | QLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | false | true | false | true | true | true |
| Endurance | 600 TBW | 1200 TBW | 2400 TBW | 1200 TBW | 2000 TBW | 1400 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | User Sentiment | Endurance | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seagate FireCuda X1070 | 83.1 | 92.1 | 14.7 | 55.3 | 8.9 | 88.8 | 5.6 | 37.8 |
| Samsung 990 PRO Compare | 93.7 | 97.4 | 99 | 78.5 | 78.8 | 86 | 95.4 | 20.8 |
| Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare | 99.1 | 99.2 | 89.5 | 92.5 | 0 | 86 | 77.3 | 11.7 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 94 | 96.9 | 99 | 78.5 | 78.8 | 82.9 | 95.4 | 19.6 |
| Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare | 93.3 | 94.5 | 94 | 78.5 | 66.9 | 94 | 95.4 | 15.8 |
| Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Compare | 98.2 | 98.5 | 97.6 | 78.5 | 0 | 91.1 | 51.8 | 24 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Amazon 1 Angebot Ab 200 $
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt61.7
- Budget64.8
- Gaming58.2
- Laptop66.5
- Console56.7
- Portable15.4
- Workstation54
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.