Crucial MX500 1TB SATA III M.2 2280
The 1TB M.2 SATA III drive hits 560 MB/s reads and 510 MB/s writes, with 95K/90K random IOPS, backed by TLC NAND and a DRAM cache. Its AES 256-bit hardware encryption and Power Loss Immunity protect data during outages, while the 5-year warranty and 1.8 million-hour MTBF signal long-term reliability. Best for budget-conscious desktop builders upgrading from a hard drive, who want dependable speed and data security without moving to NVMe.
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong feature (94th percentile) 94th
- Strong social proof (77th percentile) 77th
Nachteile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Basierend auf 11 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Drive
| Capacity | 1000 |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III |
| Protocol | SATA |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 560 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 510 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 95000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 90000 |
Hardware
| NAND | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | Yes |
Reliability
| MTBF (hours) | 1800000 |
| Warranty (years) | 5 |
Features
| Hardware Encryption | Yes |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Crucial MX500 | Samsung 990 PRO | Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 | Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G | Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO | Team Group MP44 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1TB | 2TB | 4TB | 2TB | 2TB | 4TB |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 560 MB/s | 7,450 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,000 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s |
| Nand Type | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | true | true | false | true | true | false |
| Endurance | - | 1200 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2000 TBW | 1400 TBW | 2000 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | User Sentiment | Endurance | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crucial MX500 | 35.3 | 43.4 | 94 | 55.3 | 16.3 | 64.6 | 77.3 | 46.7 |
| Samsung 990 PRO Compare | 93.7 | 97.4 | 99 | 78.5 | 79.3 | 86 | 95.3 | 20.9 |
| Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare | 99.1 | 99.2 | 89.4 | 92.6 | 0 | 86 | 77.3 | 12 |
| Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare | 93.3 | 94.4 | 94 | 78.5 | 67.6 | 94 | 95.3 | 15.9 |
| Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Compare | 98.1 | 98.5 | 97.6 | 78.5 | 0 | 91.1 | 51.8 | 24 |
| Team Group MP44 Compare | 93.6 | 88.7 | 53.5 | 92.6 | 79.3 | 77.1 | 87.1 | 15.4 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt48.6
- Budget68.6
- Gaming44.5
- Laptop54.6
- Console21.6
- Portable12.7
- Workstation54.5
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
