Samsung QMC QM32C 32"
The 1.1-inch ultra-slim depth and uniform bezels enable discreet, space-efficient mounting, while the 400-nit VA panel with a 4000:1 static contrast ratio delivers clear visibility in bright retail environments. Built for continuous operation, it supports a 24/7 duty cycle and integrates easily into existing control systems via LAN and RS-232. This display is best for businesses needing a reliable, networked digital signage solution for corporate lobbies or quick-service menu boards.
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong color (72nd percentile) 72nd
- Strong connectivity (68th percentile) 68th
- Strong ergonomic (66th percentile) 66th
Nachteile
- Below average performance (5th percentile)
- Below average portability (24th percentile)
- Below average feature (25th percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Basierend auf 2 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Display
| Size | 32" |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 (Full HD) |
| Panel Type | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 8 |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 400 nits |
| Color Gamut | 72% NTSC |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 3 |
| Speakers | Yes |
Ergonomics
| Pivot | Yes |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 |
Features
| Touchscreen | No |
| PIP/PBP | No |
| Power | 55 |
| Weight | 5.2 kg / 11.5 lbs |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Samsung QMC QM32C 32" | ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 | LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B | Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA | Alienware AW-Series AW2725D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 32 | 27 | 27 | 32 | 27 | 27 |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | QD-OLED | QD-OLED | OLED | OLED | QD-OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 60 | 240 | 240 | 165 | 240 | 280 |
| Response Time Ms | 8 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 |
| Adaptive Sync | - | G-Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Hdr | - | HDR10 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 400 True Black |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | Color | Mobilität | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung QMC QM32C 32" | 72 | 23.8 | 61 | 24.7 | 65.5 | 5.2 | 68.2 | 51.1 |
| ASUS ROG Swift PG27UCDM Compare | 97.3 | 63.6 | 97.9 | 87.5 | 91.9 | 98.4 | 84.9 | 99.9 |
| MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Compare | 99.2 | 63.6 | 79.3 | 87.5 | 91.9 | 98.4 | 84.9 | 99.4 |
| LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B Compare | 83.3 | 56.1 | 99.1 | 74.1 | 91.9 | 97 | 98.5 | 85.6 |
| Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA Compare | 87.3 | 63.6 | 97.9 | 87.5 | 91.9 | 98.4 | 84.9 | 71.6 |
| Alienware AW-Series AW2725D Compare | 98.7 | 81.9 | 79.3 | 74.1 | 91.9 | 99.4 | 96.3 | 99.9 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
B&H Photo 1 Angebot Ab 399 $
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
