Opteka 420-1600mm f/8.3 HD APS-C

★★★★☆ 4.0 (680)

Der Brennweitenbereich von 420 bis 1600 mm in einem 520 g schweren Ganzmetallgehäuse bietet extreme Reichweite ohne das übliche Gewicht. Das mehrschichtige Glas mit geringer Dispersion und die Blende f/8 bis f/16 passen zu Canon APS-C- und Vollformatkameras, aber der Fokus ist rein manuell. Dieses Objektiv ist für preisbewusste Tier- oder Sportfotografen gedacht, die Reichweite über Komfort stellen.

Focal length 420-1600mm
Aperture f/8.3
Mount Canon EF
format coverage APS-C
Weight 520 g
af type manual focus only
lens type super-telephoto
Opteka 420-1600mm f/8.3 HD APS-C lens
17 Gesamtbewertung

Überblick

The 30-Second Version

800mm of reach for under USD 150 is the headline, and the 4/5 star average from 680 reviews says buyers are mostly happy. But the optical score sits in the 2nd percentile and there's no autofocus or stabilization. It's a moon-shooting toy that punches above its price for patient, tripod-owning photographers.

Pros & Cons

Vorteile

  • 800mm reach (1600mm with 2x) for under USD 150 100th
  • Only 520g, easy to carry for a super-telephoto 92nd
  • Versatility score in the 86th percentile, works on APS-C and full-frame EF 89th
  • 4/5 stars from 680 Amazon reviews 87th
  • Genuinely fun for moon and stationary wildlife shots

Nachteile

  • Optical quality in the 2nd percentile, soft and vignette-prone
  • Manual focus only, AF score in the 15th percentile
  • No stabilization, 34th percentile
  • f/8.3 max aperture, f/16 with the 2x converter
  • User sentiment in the 17th percentile, compatibility headaches on mirrorless

Was Besitzer sagen

The Word on the Street

4.0/5 (680 reviews)
👍 Most buyers are genuinely surprised by the clarity and reach for the price, especially for moon and stationary wildlife shots.
👎 A recurring frustration is compatibility with Canon mirrorless cameras, which requires digging into a menu setting to enable the shutter.
🤔 Manual focus is fine for stationary subjects but a real struggle for anything moving, and some units arrive with a loose RF adapter.

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist seit dem Verkaufsstart abgekühlt
72/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysegeringe Konfidenz · 7 Quellen · Mai 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '24: 1.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '24: 4.5★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 3 Bewertungen1213Q1 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen

Basierend auf 7 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Performance

Let's talk reach first, because that's the whole point. 420-800mm natively, and 840-1600mm with the 2x converter. That's genuinely wild for a lens this cheap. The 62mm filter thread and 520g weight mean it's light enough to carry around without a sherpa, which is rare for anything in this focal range. But the optical score sits in the 2nd percentile, and that's not a typo. Four elements in two groups is about as simple as lens design gets. You get soft edges, noticeable vignetting at max zoom, and contrast that falls apart when the light gets tricky.

The aperture range is f/8.3 to f/16, which lands around the 45th percentile. Not terrible for a budget telephoto, but pair it with the 2x converter and you're effectively shooting through a pinhole. Manual focus only, no stabilization, and a minimum focus distance of 1600mm. That's over 5 feet, so forget anything close. The versatility score hits the 86th percentile, which sounds impressive until you realize it's mostly because the lens mounts on both APS-C and full-frame Canon EF bodies. The actual shooting experience is more limited than that number suggests.

Performance Percentiles

AF 20.8
Bokeh 86.6
Build 30.7
Macro 89.3
Reach 99.9
Video 28.7
Optical 19.4
Aperture 1
User Sentiment 16.5
Wide Angle 1.2
Portability 48.3
Versatility 86.9
Nutzerresonanz 59.2
Affordability 91.8
Stabilization 36.1

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Super-telephoto
Focal Length Min 420
Focal Length Max 1600
Elements 4
Groups 2
Coating HD Coated Glass

Aperture

Max Aperture f/8.3
Min Aperture f/16
Constant No

Build

Mount Canon EF
Format APS-C
Weight 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs
Filter Thread 62

AF & Stabilization

AF Type manual focus only
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 1600

vs Competition

Stacked against the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM, the Opteka wins on reach by a mile but loses on everything else. The Canon has autofocus, image stabilization, and far better optics, but it tops out at 250mm. The Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 is a more versatile all-rounder with VC stabilization, but it's a different mount and a different price class entirely. The Nikon NIKKOR 20059 and Sony E PZ 16-50mm aren't even in the same conversation for reach. The Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN is a fantastic lens, but it's a wide-angle prime, so comparing it to an 800mm super-telephoto is like comparing a bicycle to a cargo ship. The Opteka occupies a weird niche: maximum reach, minimum everything else.

Spec Opteka 420-1600mm f/8.3 HD Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z Panasonic LUMIX S S-S50 Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro
Focal Length 420-1600mm 50mm 135mm 85mm 50mm 23mm
Max Aperture f/8.3 f/1.8 f/1.8 f/2 f/1.8 f/1.4
Mount Canon EF Nikon Z Sigma SA Sony E L-Mount Nikon Z
Format Coverage APS-C full-frame full-frame full-frame full-frame APS-C
Stabilization false false false false false false
Weather Sealed false true true true true true
Weight (g) 520 185 90 340 300 368
AF Type manual focus only Silent Wave Motor Hyper Sonic AF Motor STM Linear AF Motor Digital Stepping Motor
Lens Type super-telephoto prime prime prime prime prime
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AFBokehBuildMacroReachVideoOpticalApertureUser SentimentWide AnglePortabilityVersatilityNutzerresonanzAffordability
Opteka 420-1600mm f/8.3 HD 20.886.630.789.399.928.719.4116.51.248.386.959.291.8
Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.8 S Compare 83.662.177.438.143.928.767.474.83239.986.53392.652.3
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 Compare 83.69777.452.178.428.76474.809.896.83365.884.4
Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z Compare 68.881.177.429.165.972.462.464.192.719.769.13381.775
Panasonic LUMIX S S-S50 Compare 95.46477.434.543.972.443.974.849.539.973.93381.769.7
Yongnuo YN 23mm f/1.4 DA DSM WL Pro Compare 68.837.877.489.329.472.448.288.992.756.765.93398.977.1

Preis

Value & Pricing

At USD 100 to USD 149, this is one of the cheapest ways to get past 400mm on a Canon EF body. The spread across vendors is USD 49, so it's worth checking both listings before you buy. For context, the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM costs more and gives you less than a third of the reach, though it does give you autofocus and stabilization. The Opteka is a value play in the purest sense: you're trading optical quality and usability for raw focal length. If you know exactly what you're getting into, the price is hard to argue with. If you expect it to perform like a USD 1000 lens, you'll be disappointed fast.

Ab 140 $ 1 Angebot bei 1 Händler
Amazon 1 Angebot Ab 140 $

Price History

New Kit
80 $ 100 $ 120 $ 140 $ 160 $ 30. Mai14. Juli28. Sept.11. Nov. 140 $

Mehr erfahren

Overview

The Opteka 420-800mm is a 520g super-telephoto that costs between USD 100 and USD 149 depending on where you look. That's absurdly cheap for 800mm of reach, and with the included 2x converter you're looking at 1600mm. But the spec sheet tells the real story: f/8.3 max aperture, manual focus only, no stabilization, and just 4 elements in 2 groups. Our optical score puts this lens in the 2nd percentile, which is about as rough as it gets. Still, 680 Amazon reviews average 4 out of 5 stars, so clearly someone's having fun here.

The pitch is simple: moon shots, distant wildlife, and a cheap way to feel like you own a telescope. The catch is everything else. Manual focus at 800mm is a patience exercise, and the f/16 effective aperture with the 2x converter means you need serious light. If you're shooting stationary subjects on a tripod, this thing can surprise you. If you're chasing birds in flight, you'll want to throw it in a lake. Probably not literally. Maybe.

Common Questions

Q: Can I use this lens on a Canon mirrorless camera?

Yes, but with caveats. It's designed for Canon EF mount DSLRs, and on mirrorless bodies you'll need an EF to RF adapter. Several owners report that you also need to enable a specific menu setting to allow the shutter to fire without a lens detected. Check your camera's manual for the 'release shutter without lens' option.

Q: Is this lens good for bird photography?

Only for stationary birds. The manual focus and lack of stabilization make tracking moving subjects extremely difficult, especially at 800mm. The f/8.3 max aperture also means you need good light. For perched birds or distant wildlife that stays put, it can work with a tripod and patience.

Q: How does the 2x converter affect image quality?

It doubles your focal length to 840-1600mm but also effectively doubles the aperture to f/16. That means significantly less light and softer images. The lens already sits in the 2nd percentile for optical quality, so the converter amplifies the softness and vignetting. It's best reserved for bright daylight or moon shots.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you need autofocus, shoot moving subjects, or care about image sharpness. The 15th percentile AF score and 2nd percentile optical score are dealbreakers for sports, wildlife in motion, or anything that requires quick reactions. Also skip it if you're on a Canon mirrorless body and don't want to fiddle with menu settings and adapters. And if you have weak wrists, the 520g weight combined with the long barrel can strain after a while, according to multiple owners. This is a tripod lens for patient people, not a walkaround telephoto.

Verdict

The Opteka 420-800mm is a specialty tool for a specific kind of shooter. If you want to photograph the moon, distant stationary wildlife, or just experiment with extreme focal lengths without spending real money, it delivers. The 4/5 star average from 680 reviews backs that up. But the 2nd percentile optical score and 15th percentile AF score are real limitations. Manual focus at 800mm is genuinely hard, and the lack of stabilization means you need a tripod for anything serious. The user sentiment score in the 17th percentile reflects the frustration: compatibility issues on Canon mirrorless bodies require a specific menu setting, and some units ship with a loose RF adapter. For the price, it's a fun gamble. Just don't expect it to replace a real telephoto.

Usage Scores

Macro (34.5)Gesamt (16.8)Budget (61.4)Street (16.9)Travel (38.6)Portrait (25.8)Landscape (10.9)Professional (10.1)Video Cinema (9.9)Wildlife Sports (40.7)
  • Macro34.5
  • Gesamt16.8
  • Budget61.4
  • Street16.9
  • Travel38.6
  • Portrait25.8
  • Landscape10.9
  • Professional10.1
  • Video Cinema9.9
  • Wildlife Sports40.7

Ähnliche Produkte