Intel Celeron G5900 2-core LGA 1200
The dual-core, 3.4GHz Comet Lake chip with integrated UHD Graphics 610 provides a complete, low-power 58W solution for basic display output and office tasks without a dedicated GPU. Its support for ECC memory on the LGA 1200 socket offers a rare entry-level path to data integrity for a budget workstation. This processor is best for small business owners needing a simple, reliable system for point-of-sale terminals or basic NAS configurations.
Überblick
The 30-Second Version
The Intel Celeron G5900 is a dual-core budget desktop processor that's cheap and surprisingly snappy for single tasks, but struggles with anything multi-threaded. It's a decent pick for basic office or home theater builds at USD 36 to USD 50. For anything more demanding, spend a little extra on a used i3 or Ryzen 3 instead.
Pros & Cons
Vorteile
- Dirt cheap on the used market 94th
- Surprisingly strong single-thread performance 86th
- Low 58W TDP means easy cooling 80th
- Works with affordable 400-series motherboards 75th
- Supports ECC memory for budget server builds
Nachteile
- Only 2 cores and 2 threads
- Multi-core performance is near the bottom
- No cooler included in the box
- No turbo boost
- PCIe 3.0 only, no PCIe 4.0 support
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Basierend auf 4 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Performance
The G5900 posts a PassMark multi-core score of 572, which puts it in the 20th percentile for multi-threaded performance. That's rough. For context, a modern budget chip like the Ryzen 5 5500 scores several times higher. But the single-thread story is different. The 3434 single-thread score lands in the 86th percentile, which is genuinely impressive for a chip this cheap. That means basic tasks like launching apps, loading web pages, and navigating Windows feel snappier than you'd expect from a Celeron.
In practice, the 2 cores and 2 threads are the bottleneck. Open a dozen browser tabs, a spreadsheet, and a video call at the same time, and you'll feel it choke. The 2MB of L3 cache doesn't help either. But for a single task at a time, the 3.4GHz clock speed keeps things moving. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 610 is fine for desktop use and 1080p video playback, but don't expect it to run anything beyond the lightest of games.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Celeron |
| Model | G5900 |
| Codename | Comet Lake |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 14 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 2 |
| P-cores | 4 |
| Threads | 2 |
| Base Clock | 3400 |
| Boost Clock | 3400 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 1 |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 572 |
| PassMark Single | 3434 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 2666 |
| Channels | 2 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA 1200 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 |
| TDP | 58 |
| Unlocked | No |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
vs Competition
The Ryzen 5 5500 is the elephant in the room here. It costs more, but it's a 6-core, 12-thread chip that absolutely demolishes the G5900 in multi-threaded workloads. If you can stretch your budget even a little, that's the smarter long-term play. The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is an interesting alternative on the used market. It's older and uses a different socket, but those Xeons can be found cheap and offer more cores for server-style workloads.
Against other ultra-budget options, the G5900 holds its own in single-threaded tasks thanks to that 86th percentile score. But the be quiet! and Thermal Grizzly entries in our database are cooler products, not CPUs, so they're not really direct comparisons. If you're set on LGA 1200 and need the absolute cheapest chip that works, the G5900 is fine. Just know that a used i3-10100 or i5-10400 would be a massive upgrade for not much more money.
| Spec | Intel Celeron G5900 | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | AMD Ryzen 5 5500 | ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX | be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 | Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 CSF-AM5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 32 | 6 | 6 | 4 | - |
| Threads | 2 | 64 | 12 | 6 | 4 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3400 | 3500 | 4200 | 3600 | 3400 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 2 | 256 | 16 | 6 | 8 | - |
| Tdp W | 58 | 200 | 65 | 125 | 270 | - |
| Socket | LGA 1200 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | AM4 | AM3 | AM4 | AM5 |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | No | None | - | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Celeron G5900 | 22.4 | 54.9 | 75.4 | 23.9 | 20.2 | 80.3 | 93.5 | 85.5 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 99.1 | 90.9 | 76.4 | 97.5 | 99.2 | 0 | 88.2 | 88.8 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5500 Compare | 73.5 | 89.1 | 72.1 | 85.4 | 73.7 | 96.5 | 87.6 | 80.7 |
| ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX Compare | 32.2 | 74.8 | 54 | 33.2 | 34.3 | 78 | 54.8 | 33.8 |
| be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare | 46 | 62.6 | 61 | 31.3 | 44.3 | 90.4 | 75.4 | 49.8 |
| Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 CSF-AM5 Compare | 3.3 | 20.4 | 17.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 96.5 | 97.8 | 3 |
Preis
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place depending on where you shop. In the US, you'll find it between USD 36 and USD 50, with Newegg typically offering the best deal on refurbished units. European buyers face a wider spread, from EUR 73 to EUR 113 across German, Spanish, French, and Italian listings. That's a big gap, so it pays to shop around. Canadian pricing runs CAD 53 to CAD 89. At the low end of those ranges, this chip makes sense for a bare-bones build. At the high end, you're getting close to used Ryzen 3 or older i3 territory, which would be a much better buy.
Amazon 1 Angebot Ab 50 $
Price History
Mehr erfahren
Overview
The Intel Celeron G5900 is a budget desktop processor that sits at the very bottom of Intel's Comet Lake lineup. It's a dual-core, dual-thread chip running at 3.4GHz with no turbo boost, built for basic computing tasks like web browsing, office work, and light media playback. At USD 36 to USD 50 on the used and refurbished market, it's one of the cheapest ways to get onto the LGA 1200 platform.
People searching for this chip usually want to know if it's good enough for a basic home PC or a cheap office build. The short answer is yes, but only if your expectations are realistic. This is not a gaming CPU, and it's not going to handle heavy multitasking. What it does well is run Windows 10 or 11 for simple tasks without costing much at all.
One thing to keep in mind: there's no cooler in the box. Intel says the thermal solution is not included, so you'll need to budget for a cheap LGA 1200 cooler unless you already have one lying around. That 58W TDP means even a basic cooler will do the job, but it's still an extra cost to factor in.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Intel Celeron G5900 good for gaming?
Not really. The G5900 scores 53 out of 100 for gaming in our database, and the integrated UHD Graphics 610 can only handle very light or older titles at low settings. You'd need a dedicated GPU for anything beyond casual gaming, and even then the 2 cores will hold you back.
Q: Does the Intel Celeron G5900 come with a cooler?
No, Intel does not include a thermal solution in the box with the G5900. You'll need to buy a separate LGA 1200 cooler, though any basic model will handle the 58W TDP without issue.
Q: What motherboards are compatible with the Intel Celeron G5900?
The G5900 uses the LGA 1200 socket and works with Intel 400-series motherboards, including H410, B460, H470, and Z490 chipsets. It also supports Intel Optane Memory if your board has an M.2 slot.
Q: Is the Intel Celeron G5900 good for a home server or NAS?
It can work for a basic home server or NAS thanks to its low power draw and ECC memory support. Just keep in mind that the 2 cores will limit how many simultaneous tasks or users it can handle comfortably.
Who Should Skip This
Skip the G5900 if you plan to do any real multitasking, video editing, or gaming. Content creators, streamers, and anyone running virtual machines should look at used Ryzen 5 or i5 chips instead. If you're building a system you'll rely on daily for work with multiple apps open, the 2-core limit will frustrate you within a week. Also skip it if you're paying the high end of the European price range, EUR 113 for a Celeron is a bad deal when used i3s and Ryzen 3s sit in the same bracket.
Verdict
Should you buy the Intel Celeron G5900? If you're building a basic office PC, a home theater box, or a cheap NAS and you can find it for USD 36 to USD 40, sure. It's a functional chip that handles everyday tasks without drama. The single-thread performance is better than you'd expect, and the low power draw keeps things cool and quiet.
But if you plan to do anything beyond web browsing and document editing, look elsewhere. The 2-core, 2-thread design is a hard ceiling. A used Ryzen 3 or i3 from the same era will cost a bit more and deliver dramatically better performance. The G5900 is a stopgap chip, not a foundation for a system you'll want to keep using for years.