Canon EOS R6 Mark III Black 2025
Der 32,5-Megapixel-Vollformat-CMOS-Sensor und der DIGIC X-Prozessor liefern eine Auflösung, die 34 % über dem Vorgängermodell liegt, kombiniert mit mechanischen 40 Bildern pro Sekunde. Die interne 7K-60p-RAW-Videoaufzeichnung und das leichte 395-Gramm-Gehäuse machen ihn zu einem ernstzunehmenden Hybrid-Werkzeug für unterwegs. Diese Kamera eignet sich am besten für Content Creator und Filmemacher, die hochauflösendes 7K-Rohmaterial und 4K-120p-Zeitlupen in einem kompakten Formfaktor benötigen.
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile) 96th
- Strong burst (90th percentile) 90th
- Strong display (87th percentile) 87th
- Strong video (71st percentile) 71st
Nachteile
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
- Q2 202691/100
Buyers in Q2 2026 praised the R6M3's low-light performance, autofocus, and build quality, with many upgrading from older Canon models. One negative review cited high price and poor quality.
- Excellent low-light performance and full-frame upgrade from APS-C or older DSLRs.
- Fast autofocus and eye detection, especially for bird photography and action.
- Great build quality, comfortable feel, and value for the price.
- One buyer found it overpriced and quality not matching description.
- Q1 202689/100
Buyers in Q1 2026 praised the R6 Mark III's speed, autofocus, and build quality, while noting a steep learning curve and high power consumption.
- Fast and accurate autofocus, praised for stills and video performance.
- Solid build and reliability, with users confident in long-term durability.
- Power-hungry; backup batteries recommended for extended shoots.
- Learning curve due to extensive features, but ultimately satisfying.
- Q4 202590/100
Buyers praised the camera's image quality, speed, and autofocus, but noted a steep learning curve and a specific issue with the TV setting not going below 1/50.
- Great image quality, speed, and autofocus; major upgrade from DSLR or older mirrorless.
- Steep learning curve with many settings; some users need support for specific functions.
- TV setting issue: cannot set exposure below 1/50, requiring Canon support.
- Lightweight, fast delivery, and features like pre-capture for wildlife.
Basierend auf 39 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Sensor
| Type | 35.9 x 23.9mm (Full-Frame) CMOS |
| Size | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 34.2 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 |
| Processor | (One) DIGIC X |
Shooting
| Burst (Mechanical) | 40 |
| Max Shutter | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | Yes |
Video
| Max Resolution | 4K |
| 10-bit | Yes |
| Codec | H.264 |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 3" |
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Articulating | Yes |
Build
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| USB | USB-C |
| HDMI | ✓ |
| Hot Shoe | Yes |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Canon EOS R6 Mark III | Fujifilm X-H2S | Sony a1 II | Panasonic Lumix S S5 II | Nikon Z Z8 | OM System OM-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | 34.2MP full-frame | 26.2MP aps-c | 50.1MP full-frame | 24.2MP full-frame | 45.7MP full-frame | 20.4MP micro-four-thirds |
| AF Points | - | 425 | 759 | 779 | 493 | 1053 |
| Burst FPS | 40 | 40 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 10 |
| Video | 4K | 6K @120fps | 8K @120fps | 6K @60fps | 8K @120fps | 4K @60fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 395 | 579 | 658 | 658 | 820 | 511 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III | 35.7 | 39.6 | 71 | 90.1 | 71.1 | 66.6 | 46.5 | 86.9 | 95.6 | 62.7 | 35.4 |
| Fujifilm X-H2S Compare | 89.7 | 96.7 | 94.8 | 93.5 | 98.2 | 96.8 | 98.2 | 99.1 | 95.6 | 94.4 | 95.4 |
| Sony a1 II Compare | 96.2 | 98.7 | 96 | 91.3 | 99.1 | 73.1 | 93.6 | 99.6 | 95.6 | 98 | 99.6 |
| Panasonic Lumix S S5 II Compare | 97.8 | 90.6 | 96 | 91.3 | 94.7 | 54.6 | 92.2 | 99.4 | 95.6 | 94.4 | 88.5 |
| Nikon Z Z8 Compare | 91.4 | 91.1 | 97.8 | 96 | 99.4 | 69.9 | 91.3 | 86.9 | 95.6 | 98 | 88.5 |
| OM System OM-1 Compare | 95 | 97.7 | 85.1 | 94.9 | 85.5 | 47.5 | 95.5 | 86.9 | 89.3 | 89 | 88.5 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Adorama 1 Angebot Ab 3.149 $
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
