Im Angebot 7%

Nikon Z fc DX-Format Silver

★★★★★ 4.7 (48)

Der 20,9 MP APS-C-Sensor und der EXPEED 6-Prozessor liefern gestochen scharfe 4K-UHD-Videos, während das klassische, taktile Design mit Messingzifferblättern sofort ins Auge fällt. Mit nur 397 g und dem voll beweglichen 3-Zoll-Touchdisplay ist sie extrem kompakt und ermöglicht kreative Perspektiven aus jedem Winkel. Diese Kamera ist ideal für Reise- und Straßenfotografen, die eine leichte, stilvolle Zweitkamera mit moderner Technik suchen.

Type Mirrorless
Sensor 21.5MP APS-C
Burst 11 fps
Video 4K
Weather Sealed Ja
Weight 397 g
Nikon Z fc DX-Format Silver camera
59 Gesamtbewertung
Auch erhältlich in:

Snapshot

Vor- und Nachteile

Pros

  • Strong build (90th percentile) 90th
  • Strong connectivity (85th percentile) 85th
  • Strong user sentiment (83th percentile) 83th
  • Strong sensor (80th percentile) 80th

Cons

  • Below average af (32th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
  • Below average evf (35th percentile)

What owners think

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben — so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist über die Zeit stabil geblieben
88/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalyse▲3hohe Konfidenz · 49 Quellen · Juni 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '21: 4.9★ · 16 BewertungenQ4 '21: 4.1★ · 8 BewertungenQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 6 BewertungenQ2 '22: 4.7★ · 7 BewertungenQ3 '22: 4.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ4 '22: 4.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ3 '23: 4.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 1 Bewertung168673221111Q3 '21Q4 '21Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q1 '23Q3 '23Q4 '23Q1 '25Q2 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen
  1. Q3 202265/1004.0★3 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise its cute design and nostalgic feel, but note ergonomic issues, limited manual controls, and poor image quality for some.

    • Attractive design and pleasant shooting experience, especially for enthusiasts.
    • Ergonomic problems: hard to hold, one-handed use impossible, hand cramps.
    • Lack of direct manual controls; frequent dependence on touch-screen menu.
    • Poor image quality and low resolution that limits cropping.
  2. Q2 202280/1004.7★7 Bewertungen

    Buyers love this camera's retro style and portability, but note battery life, kit lens vignetting, and slower focus in low light.

    • Enjoyable retro design, lightweight, and fun to use.
    • Kit lens vignettes when extended, image quality better with other lenses.
    • Battery life is shorter than DSLRs, requiring an extra battery.
    • Autofocus slows in low-light conditions.
  3. Q1 202294/1005.0★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers in Q1 2022 praised the Z fc for its retro design and ease of use, noting excellent image and video quality, though some recommended adding a grip for better handling.

    • Retro design with physical dials makes controls quick and fun.
    • Image and video quality (4K, colors, autofocus) are highly regarded.
    • Grip is awkward; a third-party grip is recommended for comfort.
    • 28mm lens offers good contrast but imperfect bokeh and lens flare.
  4. Q4 202171/1004.1★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the retro design, autofocus, and image quality, but note flash incompatibility, limited lens choices, and lack of a grip.

    • Retro design and tactile dials are highly praised.
    • Great autofocus and image stabilization for handheld shots.
    • Incompatible with most speedlights; HSS and iTTL issues reported.
    • No grip on body; some find it comfortable, others need aftermarket parts.
  5. Q3 202196/1004.9★16 Bewertungen

    Reviewers in Q3 2021 praised the Z fc for its retro design, compact size, and joyful analog-like shooting experience. A few noted cheap-feeling plastic parts and limitations like lack of IBIS.

    • Retro aesthetic and tactile dials reminiscent of film cameras
    • Compact, lightweight, ideal for everyday carrying and travel
    • Build quality concerns: plastic battery door and faux leather feel cheap
    • Improved features over Z50: USB-C charging, flip-out screen, better autofocus

Basierend auf 48 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

The proof

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

AF 31.9
EVF 34.9
Build 89.9
Burst 68.1
Video 57.5
Sensor 80.4
Battery 44.9
Display 65.2
User Sentiment 83.4
Connectivity 84.5
Social Proof 68.8
Stabilization 32.1

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Sensor

Type 23.5 x 15.7 mm (APS-C) CMOS
Size APS-C
Megapixels 21.51 MP
ISO Range 100
Processor EXPEED 6

Autofocus

AF Type Autofocus, Manual

Shooting

Burst (Mechanical) 11
Max Shutter 1/4000
Electronic Shutter Yes

Video

Max Resolution 4K
Codec H.264

Display & EVF

Screen Size 3"
Touchscreen Yes
Articulating No

Build

Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs

Connectivity

Wi-Fi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
USB USB-C
HDMI Yes
Hot Shoe Yes

Im Vergleich

Spec Nikon Z fc DX-Format Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Sony a7 a7 V Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 Panasonic LUMIX GH7 GH7 OM System OM-1 Mark II OM-1 Mark II
Type Mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless
Sensor 21.5MP APS-C 32.5MP full-frame 33MP full-frame 40.2MP aps-c 25.2MP micro-four-thirds 20.4MP micro-four-thirds
AF Points - 1053 759 425 315 1053
Burst FPS 11 40 30 20 75 120
Video 4K 6K @120fps 4K @120fps 8K @60fps 5K @120fps 4K @60fps
IBIS false true true true true true
Weather Sealed true true true true true true
Weight (g) 397 609 610 579 721 511
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfEvfBuildBurstVideoSensorBatteryDisplayUser SentimentConnectivitySocial ProofStabilization
Nikon Z fc DX-Format 31.934.989.968.157.580.444.965.283.484.568.832.1
Canon EOS R6 Mark III R6 Mark III Compare 98.286.694.492.789.257.896.498.993.29392.299.5
Sony a7 a7 V Compare 95.287.594.590.389.259.196.599.493.29396.896.2
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 Compare 8795.489.184.595.297.796.982.283.49392.293.6
Panasonic LUMIX GH7 GH7 Compare 8386.697.59597.255.389.182.293.29377.896.2
OM System OM-1 Mark II OM-1 Mark II Compare 98.28988.699.884.139.994.182.20937699.5

Price

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Ab 1.410 $ 4 Angebote bei 1 Händlern

Price History

1.300 $ 1.400 $ 1.500 $ 1.600 $ 1.700 $ 1.800 $ 12. Mai29. Mai 1.410 $

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Overall (58.6)Video (51.7)Travel (56.3)Youtube (44.4)Beginner (55.1)Vlogging (39.7)Streaming (57.9)Photography (52.4)Wedding Events (55)Sports Wildlife (52)Product Photography (63.3)

Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.

Ähnliche Produkte