SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Lexar NM620

Lexar NM620

Lexar
49 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
Lexar
19
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Lexar
49
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Lexar
40
Budget
SanDisk
72
Lexar
44
Laptop
SanDisk
67
Lexar
51
Portable
SanDisk
24
Lexar
12

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Lexar NM620
Drive
Capacity
8,000
256
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
3,300
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
3,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Lexar NM620

  • Strong social proof (70th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile

Preise

Lexar NM620 is 1.937 $ cheaper (18.2x less).

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 81000.044Score pro Dollar
vs
Lexar NM6200.432Score pro Dollar

Lexar NM620 bietet 9.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Lexar NM620

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen