SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston DC600M 960GB SATA III 2.5"
Kingston
53 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Budget
Portable
Spezifikationen
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Kingston DC600M | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | 2.5" |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | SATA III |
| Protocol | NVMe | SATA |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | — |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | Keine Daten | |
| Random Read (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | Keine Daten | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓ | ✓ |
Vor- & Nachteile
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Kingston DC600M 960GB SATA III 2.5"
- Strong endurance (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average random (22nd percentile)
- Below average speed (23rd percentile)
Preise
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.044Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston DC600M 960GB SATA III 2.5"0.118Score pro Dollar
Kingston DC600M 960GB SATA III 2.5" bietet 2.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.
