SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Team Group T-Force G50 EVO
Team Group
55 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
Spezifikationen
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Team Group T-Force G50 EVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | QLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
Team Group T-Force G50 EVO
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong speed (74th percentile)
- Strong endurance (68th percentile)
- Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average feature (14th percentile)14th %ile
Preise
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 81000.044Score pro Dollar
vs
Team Group T-Force G50 EVO0.114Score pro Dollar
Team Group T-Force G50 EVO bietet 2.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.
