SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung PM9A1 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2
Samsung
46 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Budget
Portable
Spezifikationen
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Samsung PM9A1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | — |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | — |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | Keine Daten | |
| MTBF (hours) | Keine Daten | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Samsung PM9A1 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2
- Strong random (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
Preise
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.043Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung PM9A1 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.20.182Score pro Dollar
Samsung PM9A1 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 bietet 4.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.
