SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Inland
51 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
Spezifikationen
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Inland TN320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Keine Daten | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | — |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 6★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong affordability (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preise
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.043Score pro Dollar
vs
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.852Score pro Dollar
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 bietet 19.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.
