Crucial T710

Crucial T710

Crucial
93 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ediloca EN760

Ediloca EN760

Ediloca
68 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Workstation
Crucial
94
Ediloca
64
Budget
Crucial
93
Ediloca
65
Gaming
Crucial
93
Ediloca
66
Console
Crucial
92
Ediloca
54
Laptop
Crucial
83
Ediloca
60
Portable
Crucial
25
Ediloca
18

Spezifikationen

Crucial T710Ediloca EN760
Drive
Capacity
2,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
5,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,800
4,500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,300,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓★✗
ControllerMicron G9—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,200
700
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✗—

Vor- & Nachteile

Crucial T710

  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong endurance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Ediloca EN760

  • Strong endurance (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Strong speed (73rd percentile)

Preise

Ediloca EN760 is 184 $ cheaper (2.1x less).

Crucial T7100.266Score pro Dollar
vs
Ediloca EN7600.410Score pro Dollar

Ediloca EN760 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Crucial T710

Scores 93 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 17 specs.

Crucial T710 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen