Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Hasselblad XCD 4/28P 28mm

Hasselblad XCD 4/28P 28mm

Hasselblad
51 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
86
Hasselblad
51
Street
Sigma
86
Hasselblad
51
Macro
Sigma
82
Hasselblad
61
Portrait
Sigma
81
Hasselblad
61
Travel
Sigma
80
Hasselblad
25
Budget
Sigma
75
Hasselblad
48
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Hasselblad
52
Landscape
Sigma
71
Hasselblad
31
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Hasselblad
42

Spezifikationen

Sigma 207975Hasselblad XCD 4/28P 28mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min10 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm28 mm
Elements139
Groups108
Aspherical Elements12
ED Elements41
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony EHasselblad X
FormatAPS-Cmedium-format
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg1.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocuslinear stepping motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm220 mm
Max Magnification1:41:6

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (30th percentile)

Hasselblad XCD 4/28P 28mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (65th percentile)
  • Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preise

Sigma 207975 is 1.139 $ cheaper (3.1x less).

Sigma 2079750.158Score pro Dollar
vs
Hasselblad XCD 4/28P 28mm0.031Score pro Dollar

Sigma 207975 bietet 5.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen