Intel Core Ultra 265K 20-core LGA1851
معالج 20 نواة ببنية 8P+12E وسرعة تعزيز 5.5 جيجاهرتز يسجل 58619 نقطة في PassMark ويدعم ذاكرة DDR5 حتى 192 جيجابايت مع ECC. توفر وحدة معالجة الرسومات المدمجة Arc Xe-LPG بـ 64 وحدة تنفيذ ودعم PCIe 5.0 أداءً جيدًا للمهام الإنتاجية وأحمال عمل الذكاء الاصطناعي، بينما يسمح المضاعف غير المقفل برفع تردد التشغيل. الأنسب للمستخدمين الذين يحتاجون أداءً عاليًا متعدد الخيوط للرendering وتحرير الفيديو أو نمذجة الذكاء الاصطناعي دون الحاجة إلى بطاقة رسومات منفصلة قوية.
لا يوجد سعر حالي لدى المتاجر
لمحة سريعة
The 30-Second Version
Intel finally got the memo. The 265K is a 20-core efficiency monster with the best single-thread score we've ever recorded, and it's under $400.
Pros & Cons
الإيجابيات
- Single-thread performance is literally the best we've seen 99th
- 20 cores on a 3nm process means excellent efficiency 96th
- DDR5 support up to 192GB with ECC is a workstation flex 96th
- Unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking 95th
السلبيات
- Social proof is weak, only 4 reviews so far
- 250W turbo power draw needs serious cooling
- Server performance is the weakest area at 72.2
- New socket means new motherboard required
الأدلة
Performance
The single-thread numbers genuinely surprised us. 4928 in PassMark puts this at the 100th percentile, best-in-class, no caveats. Multi-thread is right up there too at 58619, landing in the top 5% of everything we've tested. The 8P+12E layout with 24MB of L2 and 30MB of L3 means it chews through productivity workloads without breaking a sweat. The 125W TDP is reasonable, though that 250W turbo ceiling means you'll want decent cooling if you plan to push it.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Core Ultra 7 |
| Model | 265K |
| Codename | Arrow Lake |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 3 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 20 |
| P-cores | 8 |
| E-cores | 12 |
| Threads | 20 |
| Base Clock | 3900 |
| Boost Clock | 5500 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 24 |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 58572 |
| PassMark Single | 4929 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 6400 |
| Channels | 2 |
| Max Memory | 256 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA1851 |
| PCIe | 5 |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 |
| TDP | 125 |
| Max Turbo Power | 250 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
vs Competition
The obvious rival is the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. AMD's chip brings the 3D V-Cache gaming magic, but the 265K counters with better all-around productivity and that chart-topping single-thread score. The Core i9 X-Series options floating around are older architecture at this point, and they can't touch the efficiency of this 3nm Arrow Lake design. If you're building a mixed-use rig that does real work and plays games, the 265K is the smarter buy. Pure gaming? The 9800X3D still has an edge in cache-sensitive titles.
| Spec | Intel Core Ultra 265K | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | G.Skill Trident Z Neo | Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: | Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 20 | 8 | - | 6 | 6 | - |
| Threads | 20 | 16 | - | 12 | 12 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 5500 | 5200 | - | 4200 | 4000 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 30 | 96 | - | 32 | 8 | - |
| Tdp W | 125 | 120 | - | 65 | 15 | - |
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 | - | AMD Socket AM4 | AM4 | - |
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | AMD Radeon | - | - | AMD Integrated Graphics | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| المنتج | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | التقييم الاجتماعي | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core Ultra 265K | 95.2 | 89.2 | 95.5 | 96.1 | 94.9 | 24.4 | 20.3 | 99.4 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare | 91.7 | 98.5 | 95.2 | 88.9 | 89.2 | 99.5 | 23.7 | 95.1 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.8 | 20.7 | 17.4 | 66.7 | 97.1 | 0 | 6.4 | 98.4 |
| G.Skill Trident Z Neo Compare | 72.4 | 87.4 | 78.9 | 84.3 | 72.1 | 0 | 20.4 | 72.6 |
| Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: Compare | 62.1 | 55.4 | 57.4 | 99.4 | 62.7 | 9 | 9.8 | 67 |
| Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X Compare | 63.9 | 20.7 | 17.4 | 39.8 | 81.9 | 0 | 39.6 | 85.7 |
السعر
Value & Pricing
At $389 USD, this is a steal for what you're getting. You're paying mid-range money for top-tier single-thread performance and near-flagship multi-thread. The only real question is whether you need the platform upgrade that comes with it.
Price History
اقرأ المزيد
Overview
The Core Ultra 7 265K is Intel's most interesting desktop chip in years. 20 cores, 5.5GHz boost, and a 3nm process that finally puts efficiency back on the table. The headline here isn't raw core count, it's that single-thread score sitting at the absolute top of our charts. This thing trades blows with chips that cost way more.
Common Questions
Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?
Yes, actually. It's got an Arc Xe-LPG GPU with 64 execution units baked in. Not a gaming powerhouse, but plenty for display output and light tasks. The Q&A saying no graphics card is technically right, there's no dedicated card, but the iGPU is there.
Q: What motherboard do I need for this?
You'll need an LGA1851 socket board. That's the new platform for Arrow Lake, so your old LGA1700 board won't work. Factor that into your upgrade budget.
Q: Is this good for gaming or just productivity?
Both, honestly. The single-thread performance is the best we've tested, which matters a lot for games. The 20 cores handle streaming, rendering, and multitasking without flinching. It's a great all-rounder.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a dedicated server or need maximum multi-socket reliability, this isn't your chip. The server score of 72.2 tells the story. Look at Xeon or EPYC options instead. And if you're a pure gamer who only cares about frame rates, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is still the better pick for cache-hungry titles.
Verdict
Buy it. The Core Ultra 7 265K is the best all-around desktop CPU Intel has shipped in a long time. Top-tier single-thread, excellent multi-thread, and a price that doesn't make you wince. Just budget for a new motherboard and a decent cooler.
Usage Scores
- الإجمالي81.3
- AI/LLM83.9
- Budget76.1
- الألعاب75.9
- Server75.2
- Efficiency77.3
- Productivity87.8
