Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm

★★★★☆ 4.3 (11)

The 110° angle of view (equivalent to 15mm on full-frame), f/2 aperture, and 150g weight make this the widest rectilinear prime available for Micro Four Thirds. Its 4.72-inch minimum focus distance enables creative close-up shots with a wide background, while the 46mm filter thread supports direct landscape filters. This lens is best for travel and astro-photographers who need a compact, fast ultra-wide optic that won't burden a lightweight MFT kit.

Focal length 8mm
Aperture f/2
Mount Micro Four Thirds
Weight 150 g
lens type wide-angle
Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm lens
51 综合评分
其他可用国家/地区:

概览

The 30-Second Version

A tiny, ultra-wide gem for MFT that demands your patience with manual focus but rewards you with a dramatic, distortion-free perspective. Skip it if you hate fiddling with focus rings, but for everyone else, it's the most fun you can have under $400.

Pros & Cons

优点

  • Incredibly wide 110-degree view without fisheye distortion 90th
  • Tiny and lightweight, a perfect travel companion at 150g 88th
  • Bright f/2 aperture is rare for an ultra-wide MFT lens 88th
  • Solid, all-metal build feels premium and durable

缺点

  • Manual focus only, with a twitchy focus ring that's easy to miss
  • Noticeable purple fringing and lens flare in backlit scenes
  • No electronic contacts mean no EXIF data and potential RAW file bugs
  • Poor close-up performance, not a lens for detail shots

用户评价

The Word on the Street

4.3/5 (11 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently rave about the sharpness and solid metal build, saying it feels far more expensive than it is.
🤔 The manual focus is a real pain point, with several shooters finding it too finicky to nail focus quickly, especially wide open.
👎 A recurring technical headache is corrupted RAW files on some Olympus bodies, a bug that can ruin a shoot if you're not shooting JPEG backup.

用户口碑如何随时间变化

独家

依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。

自上市以来,用户口碑有所降温
78/100我们的 AI 口碑分析置信度中 · 13 个来源 · 2026年7月
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '18: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '18: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q3 '18: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q4 '18: 4.3★ · 4 条评价Q1 '19: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '19: 4.0★ · 1 条评价Q4 '19: 4.0★ · 1 条评价Q3 '23: 2.0★ · 1 条评价12141111Q1 '18Q2 '18Q3 '18Q4 '18Q1 '19Q2 '19Q4 '19Q3 '23
平均评分满意(4-5★)不满意(1-2★)柱形高度 = 评价数量

基于 12 条带日期的客户评价,按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。

实测数据

Performance

The sharpness from this little lens genuinely surprised us, especially considering its size. When you nail focus, the center is crisp and detailed, holding up well even wide open at f/2. The build quality is another high point, it feels dense and mechanical, not like a plastic toy. But the lack of any electronic communication with the camera body is a double-edged sword. You get no EXIF data on aperture, and we saw multiple user reports of corrupted RAW files on certain Olympus bodies, which is a workflow killer. The manual focus ring is smooth, but the focus throw is short, making precise adjustments at f/2 a bit twitchy. Optically, it's a mixed bag. Distortion is impressively well-controlled for such a wide lens, but you'll see noticeable purple fringing in high-contrast edges and some ugly ghosting flare if the sun catches the front element. The built-in petal hood helps a little, but it's not a cure-all. Low-light performance is decent thanks to that f/2 aperture, but the challenging manual focus means you'll miss more shots in the dark than you would with an autofocus lens.

Performance Percentiles

AF 54.7
Bokeh 88.1
Build 88.3
Macro 7.9
Optical 47
Aperture 90
User Sentiment 34.7
Versatility 34
用户口碑 29
Stabilization 35.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Wide-angle
Focal Length Min 8
Focal Length Max 8
Elements 13
Groups 9

Aperture

Max Aperture f/2
Min Aperture f/2
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 7

Build

Mount Micro Four Thirds
Format micro-four-thirds
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.3 lbs
Filter Thread 46

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Max Magnification 0.11x

vs Competition

Pitting this against the listed competitors like the Sigma 16-300mm or Tamron 18-300mm is a bit silly, those are all-in-one superzooms that prioritize reach over wide-angle specialty. The Laowa isn't trying to do everything, it's trying to be the widest, fastest prime in your bag. A more honest rival is the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 9mm f/1.7. The Panasonic gives you autofocus, weather sealing, and an even faster aperture, but it's not as wide and costs significantly more. The Laowa wins on sheer field of view and price. If you need a rectilinear ultra-wide and can live without autofocus, the Laowa is the more dramatic and affordable choice. If you need a dependable, set-it-and-forget-it wide angle for run-and-gun video, the Panasonic is the safer bet.

Spec Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Meike 50mm F1.8 Full Frame STM Auto Focus Prime Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
Focal Length 8mm 16-300mm 18-300mm 28-200mm 50mm 50-140mm
Max Aperture f/2 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/4 f/1.8 f/2.8
Mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E Fujifilm X L-Mount Panasonic Sigma L Fujifilm X
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false true false true false true
Weight (g) 150 615 92 413 297 995
AF Type - HLA VXD linear motor Autofocus STM Triple Linear Motor
Lens Type wide-angle zoom zoom macro prime zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
产品 AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatility用户口碑Stabilization
Laowa 7.5mm f/2 Lightweight 8mm 54.788.188.37.9479034.7342935.6
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare 54.784.357.986.598.877099.68399.1
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.17596.388.473.57734.799.28380.5
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare 54.777.973.989.590.971.5095.775.399.4
Meike 50mm F1.8 Full Frame STM Auto Focus Prime Compare 85.595.971.396.157.29388.43449.980.5
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Compare 98.181.435.216.998.383.8078.78896.3

价格

Value & Pricing

The value here is a bit of a rollercoaster. We saw prices ranging from a reasonable $389 all the way up to a baffling $81,742 from one vendor, so please, shop around and don't get scammed. At the low end of that spectrum, this lens is an absolute steal for the unique perspective it offers. You're getting a fast, ultra-wide prime with solid optics for less than most first-party zooms. If you can snag it for under $400, it's a no-brainer for MFT shooters who need this focal length. The value proposition crumbles if you pay anything close to four figures, at that point, you're in used premium glass territory.

最低 MX$17,761 1 家零售商共 1 个报价
Amazon.com.mx 1 个报价 最低 MX$17,761

我们自 2026年5月29日 起追踪该产品的价格。数据增多后将显示图表。

了解更多

Overview

The Laowa 7.5mm f/2 is a tiny marvel that solves a real problem for Micro Four Thirds shooters. It's the widest rectilinear lens you can slap on an MFT body, giving you a massive 110-degree view without the fisheye distortion. That alone makes it a must-look for real estate, architecture, and landscape photographers who are tired of backing into walls. It's also shockingly small and light, barely bigger than a stack of lens caps, which means it lives in your bag instead of gathering dust on a shelf. The f/2 aperture is a genuine standout, pulling in enough light to make handheld dusk shots and even some astrophotography possible. But this isn't a point-and-shoot experience. It's a fully manual lens, and that's where the love-it-or-hate-it divide begins. If you enjoy slowing down and dialing in focus, you'll adore it. If you rely on autofocus, you'll be frustrated fast. The optics are sharp when you nail focus, but you'll battle some purple fringing and flare in harsh light. For the price, it's a specialized tool that delivers a unique perspective, but it demands your patience in return.

Common Questions

Q: Will this lens work on my APS-C Sony or Fuji camera?

No, don't even try it. This is a dedicated Micro Four Thirds lens, and the image circle won't cover an APS-C sensor. You'll get heavy, unusable vignetting. If you're on Sony E-mount, grab the Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D instead.

Q: Is this lens good for vlogging or video?

It's a mixed bag. The wide field of view is great for handheld walking shots, but the manual focus is tough to pull off smoothly while moving. The bigger issue is that the built-in lens hood can creep into the frame in video mode on some bodies, which is a distracting dealbreaker for serious video work.

Q: How hard is it to focus without autofocus?

Harder than you might think at f/2. The focus ring is smooth but has a very short throw, so tiny movements make a big difference. Use your camera's focus peaking and magnification, and stop down to f/4 or f/5.6 if you can, that'll make your life much easier and your shots much sharper.

Who Should Skip This

If you're a run-and-gun street photographer or a video-first shooter who relies on snappy autofocus, this lens will drive you nuts. The manual focus is too deliberate for quick moments, and the lack of stabilization makes handheld video jittery. Go get the Panasonic 9mm f/1.7 instead, you'll get autofocus, weather sealing, and a smoother video experience, even if it costs a bit more.

Verdict

Get the Laowa 7.5mm f/2 if you're a stills shooter who loves the ultra-wide look and doesn't mind manual focus. It's a specialized lens that excels at real estate, dramatic landscapes, and tight interiors, delivering a perspective no kit zoom can touch. The image quality is sharp, the build is fantastic, and the size is unbeatable. Just know what you're signing up for. This is a lens that requires you to slow down, check your focus, and fix some purple fringing in post. If that sounds like a fun creative challenge, you'll love it. If it sounds like a headache, you'll be selling it on a forum within a month.

Usage Scores

Macro (30.4)总体 (50.6)Budget (50.6)Street (69.6)Travel (45.2)Portrait (71.8)Landscape (41.4)Professional (56.6)Video Cinema (59.1)Wildlife Sports (49.5)

类似产品