Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC
The 18-200mm zoom covers a 27-300mm equivalent range on APS-C cameras, with image stabilization and auto panning detection in a lightweight 405g body. A 0.45m minimum focus and 1:4.4 magnification enable versatile close-up shooting, while 72mm filter threads support easy accessory use. This lens suits outdoor travelers and hobbyists needing a single all-in-one option for landscapes and macro work, though portraiture results remain modest.
概览
The 30-Second Version
The Sigma 18-200mm lands in the 98th percentile for versatility, giving you an 11x zoom range that's basically unmatched at this price. The optical stabilization is a genuine highlight, letting you get sharp shots handheld even when the slow f/6.3 aperture is starving the sensor for light. It's a fantastic daylight travel lens for $178, but the noisy autofocus and rough bokeh mean it's not for low-light or portrait work.
Pros & Cons
优点
- Incredible 11x zoom range, top-tier versatility 98th
- Optical stabilization is a standout, sharp handheld shots 88th
- Surprisingly good optical quality for a superzoom 83rd
- Lightweight at 394g, easy to carry all day 67th
- Great value at $178 compared to first-party options
缺点
- Slow f/6.3 aperture on the long end kills low-light use
- Bokeh is harsh and busy, one of the worst we've seen
- Noisy, hunting autofocus in dim conditions
- Noticeable distortion, especially at the wide end
- No weather sealing, and some long-term reliability concerns
用户评价
The Word on the Street
用户口碑如何随时间变化
独家依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。
基于 21 条带日期的客户评价,按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。
实测数据
Performance
Optically, this lens punches above its weight. With 15 elements in 13 groups, including a couple of aspherical and ED elements, it delivers sharpness that's well above average for a superzoom. The stabilization is a real standout, letting you handhold shots at slow shutter speeds that would turn most budget zooms into a blurry mess. In our database, it's in the 83rd percentile for stabilization, and owners consistently call that out as the feature that saves this lens in dim conditions.
Autofocus is where things get middling. The micromotor is quick enough in good light, but it's noisy and can hunt when the sun goes down, landing right around the 54th percentile. Macro performance is about average too, with a 1:4.4 magnification that's fine for close-up flower shots but won't replace a dedicated macro lens. The real weak spot is the aperture. At f/6.3 on the telephoto end, you're fighting for light, and the bokeh is busy and distracting, which is why it scores so low in that category.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 18 |
| Focal Length Max | 200 |
| Elements | 15 |
| Groups | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 |
| ED Elements | 2 |
| Coating | super multi-layer coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | No |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Nikon F |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | No |
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 62 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Yes |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 450 |
| Max Magnification | 1:4.4 |
vs Competition
Stacked against the Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR, the Sigma gives you way more reach but loses the silent, snappy AF motor and compact size of the Nikon. The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 is in a different league optically and for low light, but it's a standard zoom, not a superzoom, and it costs a lot more. The Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is smaller and has power zoom, but again, you're capped at 50mm. If you need the range, the Sigma is the only game in town at this price. If you don't need 200mm, almost any modern kit zoom will feel more refined and focus faster.
| Spec | Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 18-200mm | 17-70mm | 17-28mm | 12-35mm | 16-50mm | 28-70mm |
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Stabilization | true | true | false | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 394 | 544 | 450 | 306 | 107 | 495 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | RXD | Stepping Motor | Autofocus | Autofocus | STM |
| Lens Type | telephoto | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 产品 | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | 用户口碑 | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC | 53.7 | 13.4 | 66.5 | 60.2 | 87.6 | 20.4 | 29.6 | 98.3 | 63.9 | 82.6 |
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare | 53.7 | 86.2 | 69.7 | 85.1 | 91.1 | 83.2 | 63.2 | 89.5 | 85.5 | 82.6 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare | 87.7 | 86.2 | 76 | 85.1 | 88.4 | 83.2 | 90.8 | 68 | 70.1 | 36.9 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.7 | 80.9 | 85.8 | 50.6 | 86.8 | 83.2 | 63.2 | 80.4 | 85.5 | 96.9 |
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 53.7 | 74.2 | 98.6 | 43.7 | 69.1 | 76.3 | 63.2 | 83.2 | 81.1 | 93.5 |
| Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare | 87.7 | 23.2 | 72.8 | 79.2 | 86.8 | 20.4 | 98 | 77.3 | 89.8 | 98.6 |
价格
Value & Pricing
At $178, this lens is a steal if you understand what you're buying. You're getting a do-it-all zoom range with solid optics and excellent stabilization for less than the cost of a decent prime lens. The value proposition is the main reason owners rate it well, with many comparing it favorably to Nikon's own 18-200mm which costs significantly more. Just know that you're trading speed and refinement for that price. The slow aperture and noisy AF are the cost of entry here, but if you're shooting mostly in daylight and want one lens to leave on your camera, the price-to-performance ratio is hard to beat.
了解更多
Overview
The Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC is a superzoom that lands in the 98th percentile for versatility, and honestly, that's the whole story here. You're getting an 11x zoom range that covers everything from wide landscapes to decent telephoto reach, all in a package that weighs just 394g. For a walkaround lens on an old Nikon DX body, that kind of flexibility is hard to argue with, especially when you see the optical performance sitting in the 88th percentile. It's sharper than it has any right to be for this price.
But you feel those compromises everywhere else. The aperture is slow, bottoming out at f/6.3 on the long end, which puts it in the 21st percentile. That means this lens gets dark fast as you zoom in, and the bokeh is, well, pretty rough at the 13th percentile. The micromotor AF is noisy and hunts in low light, and the build, while decent, isn't weather-sealed. It's a classic superzoom trade-off: you get the range, but you give up speed and refinement.
Common Questions
Q: Does the autofocus work on Nikon D3xxx and D5xxx series bodies?
Yes, but with a catch. This lens uses a micromotor AF drive, so it requires a camera body with a built-in focus motor. The Nikon D3xxx and D5xxx series lack this motor, meaning the lens will not autofocus on those bodies. You'll need a D7xxx series or higher, or any older film-era body with a screw-drive motor, for AF to work.
Q: How bad is the distortion at 18mm?
It's noticeable, especially if you're shooting architecture or anything with straight lines. The lens sits in the 88th percentile for overall optics, but that's buoyed by sharpness and stabilization. Barrel distortion at the wide end is a known weak point, and you'll want to enable in-camera corrections or fix it in post if you're shooting RAW.
Q: Is the image stabilization good enough for video?
The stabilization is in the 83rd percentile, so it's quite effective for stills, letting you handhold at surprisingly slow shutter speeds. For video, it will smooth out minor shakes, but the noisy AF motor will likely be picked up by your camera's onboard mic. If you're shooting video, plan on using an external microphone or manual focus.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this lens if you shoot in low light or care about bokeh. The f/6.3 aperture on the long end is a real limitation, and the bokeh quality is in the 13th percentile, meaning backgrounds will look busy and distracting. Portrait shooters should look elsewhere, the 37.3/100 score in that category tells you everything you need to know. Also, if you're on a Nikon D3xxx or D5xxx body without a focus motor, this lens won't autofocus for you, making it a manual-focus-only affair. And if you need weather sealing or silent AF for video, this isn't your lens.
Verdict
The Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC is the definition of a trade-off lens. You get best-in-class versatility and shockingly good stabilization for under $200, but you pay for it with a dim, slow aperture and autofocus that feels straight out of 2008. It's a perfect daylight travel lens for someone who hates swapping glass, and the optical quality will surprise you. Just don't expect it to perform in low light, and maybe budget for a repair fund given some of the long-term reliability grumbles from owners. For the right shooter, it's a bargain. For everyone else, it's a compromise too far.