Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851

★★★★★ 4.7 (548)

The 20-core Arrow Lake-S architecture on the 3nm process delivers a 58,722 PassMark multi-core score with a 125W TDP, making it a standout for cool and efficient high-throughput computing. Its unlocked multiplier and bundled Z890 motherboard provide robust PCIe 5.0 support and Wi-Fi 7 connectivity, offering a strong foundation for future-proof builds. This processor is best for AI developers and content creators running heavily threaded workloads who prioritize efficiency over peak gaming frame rates.

Cores 20
Threads 20
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
L3 Cache 30 MB
TDP 125 W
Socket LGA1851
Integrated Graphics None
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851 cpu
96 综合评分

暂无零售商最新价格

其他可用国家/地区:

概览

The 30-Second Version

The Core Ultra 7 265KF posts a 58,540 PassMark multi-core score, good for the 95th percentile, and a 4,927 single-core score that's in the 99th percentile. It runs cool, overclocks, and delivers huge gains for anyone coming from an older Intel chip. Just budget for a new motherboard, DDR5 RAM, and a discrete GPU since there's no integrated graphics.

Pros & Cons

优点

  • 58,540 PassMark multi-core score, 95th percentile 99th
  • 4,927 single-thread score, 99th percentile 97th
  • 20 cores (8P+12E) with 5.5GHz boost 96th
  • Runs cool thanks to 3nm TSMC process 96th
  • Unlocked for overclocking on LGA1851

缺点

  • No integrated graphics, discrete GPU required
  • New motherboard and DDR5 RAM needed
  • Installation risk of bending socket pins
  • Not a meaningful upgrade from recent Intel chips

用户评价

The Word on the Street

4.7/5 (548 reviews)
👍 Owners upgrading from older Intel chips like the 8700K report massive performance gains in both gaming and productivity, with one noting a 20fps average increase.
👍 Multiple buyers praise the thermal performance, saying the chip runs cool even under heavy load, which is a welcome change from previous Intel generations.
🤔 Several users note that while the chip is excellent value on discount, it's not a worthwhile upgrade if you're already on a recent Intel generation.

用户口碑如何随时间变化

独家

依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。

用户口碑随时间保持稳定
88/100我们的 AI 口碑分析▲28置信度中 · 14 个来源 · 2026年11月
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q3 '25: 5.0★ · 4 条评价Q4 '25: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q2 '26: 5.0★ · 1 条评价 (约日期)11421Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q2 '26
平均评分满意(4-5★)不满意(1-2★)柱形高度 = 评价数量估计日期

基于 9 条带日期的客户评价,按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。

实测数据

Performance

The headline number is 58,540 in PassMark multi-core, which lands this chip in the 95th percentile. That's the kind of score that chews through 8K video editing, heavy multitasking, and productivity workloads without breaking a sweat. Single-core performance is even more elite at 4,927, putting it in the 99th percentile. The 5.5GHz boost clock on the P-cores does the heavy lifting there, and the 12 E-cores handle background tasks so the big cores stay focused.

The cache setup is generous too: 30MB of L3 and 36MB of L2. That's a lot of fast memory close to the cores, which helps with gaming frame times and latency-sensitive workloads. The 3nm TSMC N3B process is a big reason this thing stays cool under load, and the 125W base power with 250W turbo is manageable for most mid-range coolers. One thing to note: there's no integrated GPU, so you'll need a dedicated card. For most people buying a chip like this, that's already the plan.

Performance Percentiles

AI 95.5
Feature 96.9
Platform 90.7
User Sentiment 78.9
Efficiency 95.5
Multi Thread 95.2
用户口碑 90.4
Single Thread 99.2

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Core Ultra 7
Model 265KF
Codename Arrow Lake-S
Class desktop
Process 3

Cores & Clocks

Cores 20
P-cores 8
E-cores 12
Threads 20
Base Clock 3900
Boost Clock 5500

Cache

L2 Cache 36
L3 Cache 30 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 58540
PassMark Single 4927

Memory

Memory Type DDR5
Max Speed 6400
Channels 2
Max Memory 192
ECC No

Platform & Power

Socket LGA1851
PCIe 5
PCIe Lanes 24
TDP 125
Max Turbo Power 250
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics None
NPU TOPS 13

vs Competition

Against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the 265KF trades blows depending on workload. The 9800X3D's 3D V-Cache gives it an edge in gaming frame rates, but the 265KF's 20 cores and 95th percentile multi-thread score make it the better pick for mixed productivity and gaming use. The older Intel parts in our comparison set, like the Core i9 X-Series, simply can't keep up with the 3nm efficiency and single-thread performance here. The 265KF's 99th percentile single-thread ranking is the real differentiator: it's faster per-core than nearly everything we've tested, which matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded games. If you're building a do-everything rig and don't need the absolute top gaming frame rates, this chip is the smarter all-rounder.

Spec Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 SMC EPYC 9555P CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor HP Xeon P67080-B21
Cores 20 8 32 64 24 16
Threads 20 16 64 128 48 32
Boost Clock Mhz 5500 5200 3500 4400 4000 3900
L3 Cache Mb 30 96 256 256 128 37.5
Tdp W 125 120 200 360 200 195
Socket LGA1851 AM5 Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) AMD Socket SP5 AMD Socket SP3 LGA 4677
Integrated Graphics None AMD Radeon Graphics No - - No
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
产品 AIFeaturePlatformUser SentimentEfficiencyMulti Thread用户口碑Single Thread
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 95.596.990.778.995.595.290.499.2
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare 91.398.595.192.787.79096.595.7
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare 99.190.776.3097.499.2089.3
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.376.996.8090.899.5088.7
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare 94.876.984.1083.894.536.480.2
HP Xeon P67080-B21 Compare 91.776.990.7078.290.9080.4

价格

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place right now. US listings range from $220 to $657 across 10 vendors, which is a $437 spread. That's not a typo. If you can find this chip near the low end of that range, it's an absolute steal for the performance on offer. The budget score of 97.6/100 in our database reflects that potential. Canadian buyers see a tighter but still meaningful spread of CAD 313 to CAD 496 across 4 listings. The key is patience: this chip goes on discount regularly, and multiple owners specifically mention getting it at a reduced price as a major selling point. Don't pay full retail if you can wait a few weeks.

了解更多

Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF lands in the 95th percentile for multi-threaded performance in our database, which puts it ahead of nearly everything else on the market right now. That's a 58,540 PassMark multi-core score backed by 20 cores split into 8 P-cores and 12 E-cores, with a 5.5GHz boost clock on tap. Single-threaded work is even more impressive at 4,927, good for the 99th percentile. If you're coming from something like an 8700K, this chip will feel like a time machine.

But there's a catch. No integrated graphics means you need a discrete GPU, period. And you're also committing to the LGA1851 socket, which means a new 800-series motherboard and DDR5 RAM. The 125W base TDP and 250W turbo draw are reasonable for this class, and the 3nm TSMC process keeps thermals in check. Owners report it runs cool, which is a nice change of pace for a high-end Intel part.

Common Questions

Q: Do I need a discrete GPU with the 265KF?

Yes. The 'F' in 265KF means there's no integrated graphics. You'll need a dedicated graphics card to get any video output at all. This is standard for Intel's F-series chips and helps keep the price down.

Q: What motherboard and RAM do I need?

This chip uses the LGA1851 socket, so you'll need an Intel 800-series motherboard. It also requires DDR5 RAM, up to 192GB across 2 channels. If you're coming from an older Intel platform, you'll need to upgrade both.

Q: How does the 265KF compare to the 14700K?

The 265KF uses the newer 3nm TSMC process and Arrow Lake architecture, which brings better efficiency and thermals. The 20-core configuration (8P+12E) is similar in layout to the 14700K, but the 265KF's 99th percentile single-thread performance and 95th percentile multi-thread performance put it ahead in most workloads. That said, if you already own a 14700K, the upgrade isn't dramatic enough to justify the cost.

Who Should Skip This

If you're already running a recent Intel chip like a 13th or 14th gen i7, this upgrade probably isn't worth it. The performance gains are real but incremental, and you'd be paying for a new motherboard and DDR5 RAM on top of the CPU. The 77.7/100 server score also suggests this isn't the right pick for always-on server workloads. And if you're building a pure gaming rig where every frame matters, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 3D V-Cache still wins in most gaming benchmarks. The 265KF is a productivity monster first, gamer second.

Verdict

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is one of the best high-end desktop CPUs we've seen this generation. The 95th percentile multi-thread score and 99th percentile single-thread score tell the story: this thing is fast at everything. Owners upgrading from older Intel chips report massive gains, with one noting a 20fps average increase in games. The lack of integrated graphics is a non-issue for anyone building a serious rig, and the thermal performance is genuinely impressive for a 20-core part. The only real caveat is the platform cost: new motherboard, new RAM, and a discrete GPU are all required. If you're already planning a full build, this chip is an easy recommendation.

Usage Scores

总体 (95.7)AI/LLM (92.7)Budget (97.6)游戏 (88.1)Server (77.8)Efficiency (83.3)Productivity (97.5)

其他配置2

类似产品