Sony WF-1000XM5

★★★★☆ 4.0 (25,686)

Met de dubbele ruisonderdrukkingsprocessors, de 8,4 mm Dynamic Driver X en een batterijduur van 8 uur (24 uur met case, 3 min laden voor 60 min) leveren de WF-1000XM5 de beste actieve ruisonderdrukking in hun klasse. De AI-gestuurde gespreksruisreductie met botgeleidingssensor garandeert kristalheldere oproepen, terwijl het compacte, luxe ontwerp en IPX4 spatwaterbestendigheid en comfort bieden. Ideaal voor forenzen en reizigers die in rumoerige omgevingen absolute stilte en storingsvrije telefoongesprekken eisen.

Form Factor in-ear
driver type dynamic
Wireless Ja
active noise cancellation Ja
bluetooth version 5.3
battery life hours 8
case battery hours 24
water resistance IPX4
Sony WF-1000XM5 earbuds
85 Totaalscore

Geen actuele winkelprijs

Ook beschikbaar in:

Overzicht

The 30-Second Version

Sony's best-sounding earbuds are also its most frustrating. Buy them for the audio, but keep the receipt handy.

Pros & Cons

Pluspunten

  • Sound quality is genuinely stunning, 99th percentile in our database 100th
  • ANC still ranks among the best, even if some owners disagree 99th
  • Speak-to-Chat is actually useful, not a gimmick 98th
  • Compact and light at 6g per bud, easy to forget you're wearing them 97th

Minpunten

  • Bluetooth connectivity issues are a real, recurring problem
  • Fit is hit or miss, and for some people it's a hard miss
  • Case battery drain complaints are too common to ignore
  • Price is brutal, 5th percentile for affordability

Wat eigenaren vinden

The Word on the Street

4.0/5 (25686 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently rave about the sound quality, calling it the main reason to buy these over anything else.
👎 A loud chunk of buyers are fed up with Bluetooth dropouts and charging case issues that shouldn't exist at this price.
🤔 Fit is a coin flip, some people find them perfectly comfortable while others can't keep them in their ears.

Hoe de mening van eigenaren in de loop van de tijd veranderde

Exclusief

Op basis van wanneer klanten hun reviews daadwerkelijk schreven - zo zie je of de eerste lof standhield.

De mening van eigenaren is in de loop van de tijd stabiel gebleven
62/100Onze AI-sentimentanalyse▼3hoge betrouwbaarheid · 243 bronnen · nov 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '24: 3.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '25: 4.1★ · 8 reviewsQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 8 reviewsQ3 '25: 4.4★ · 14 reviewsQ4 '25: 4.3★ · 18 reviewsQ1 '26: 3.8★ · 68 reviewsQ2 '26: 3.5★ · 68 reviewsQ3 '26: 4.2★ · 30 reviews1881418686830Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26Q3 '26
Gem. beoordelingTevreden (4-5★)Ontevreden (1-2★)Balkhoogte = aantal reviews
  1. Q3 202693/1004.7★3 reviews

    Buyers praise excellent sound quality, comfort, and multipoint connectivity. One notes slightly worse ambient mode but acceptable trade-off.

    • Excellent sound quality and ANC performance.
    • Comfortable fit, smaller than XM4, with good design.
    • Multipoint connection works well for work and personal use.
    • Ambient mode slightly worse than XM4, but acceptable trade-off.
  2. Q2 202648/1003.5★55 reviews

    Buyers praised sound quality and noise cancellation, but many reported reliability issues like connection drops, charging failures, and poor mic performance. Fit and eartip problems were also common.

    • Excellent sound quality and customizable EQ via app
    • Frequent connection dropouts and pairing issues
    • Charging case and bud contact failures reported
    • Fit and eartip comfort vary; some find them uncomfortable or loose
  3. Q1 202662/1003.8★64 reviews

    Buyers praise sound quality and noise cancelling but report frequent fit issues, charging defects, and connectivity drops. Call quality and control customization also draw criticism.

    • Sound quality and noise cancelling are widely praised as top-tier.
    • Fit problems with ear tips cause poor seal and comfort for many users.
    • Charging defects and battery failures reported within months of purchase.
    • Connectivity drops and static noise occur during movement or daily use.
  4. Q4 202544/1004.2★9 reviews

    Mixed reviews: some praise sound quality and connectivity, but many report defects, poor bass, and discomfort.

    • Sound quality is excellent, clear, and well-tuned for music lovers.
    • Reliability issues: speaker failure within a year, random disconnects.
    • Poor bass and overpriced compared to cheaper alternatives.
    • Comfort and fit are problematic; earbuds are fiddly to insert and may fall out.
  5. Q2 202533/1003 reviews

    Mixed reviews: one praises ease of use and sound quality, but two others criticize noise cancelling, fit, and durability.

    • Sound quality is stellar for music listening.
    • Noise cancelling ineffective for vehicle/tire noise, only eliminates hiss.
    • Earbuds don't stay in despite trying different tips.
    • Product lasted only 1 year 7 months before failure.
  6. Q1 20255/1003 reviews

    Buyers reported severe reliability issues: batteries failing in left earbuds, poor fit, and design flaws. Sound quality praised but overshadowed by defects.

    • Battery failure in left earbud after months; known design flaw.
    • Poor fit with stock tips; third-party tips compromise sound/ANC.
    • Slippery surface and fidgety touch controls hinder usability.
    • Sound quality is excellent when earbuds function properly.

Gebaseerd op 215 gedateerde klantreviews, gegroepeerd per kalenderkwartaal. Analyse per periode is in het Engels.

De feiten

Performance

The 8.4mm dynamic driver is the star here. Sony tuned these things to hit 20Hz to 40kHz, and with LDAC support you're getting genuinely Hi-Res audio over Bluetooth. The soundstage is wide, the bass digs deep without muddying the mids, and vocals have a clarity that makes cheaper earbuds sound like they're playing through a sock. ANC is still top-tier, sitting in the 98th percentile, but here's the catch: a chunk of owners say it's actually worse than the XM4. That's the kind of thing that makes you wonder if Sony changed something in firmware or if quality control is just all over the place. The 6-mic array handles calls well, and the 3-minute quick charge for an hour of playback is genuinely useful. But battery life at 8 hours per charge is solid, not spectacular, and the case draining quickly is a recurring complaint.

Performance Percentiles

Anc 97.5
Mic 97.4
Build 78.7
Sound 98.8
Battery 73.3
Comfort 93.2
User Sentiment 11.8
Connectivity 99.9
Gebruikersoordeel 62.5
Affordability 5.9

Specifications

Full Specifications

Design

Form Factor in-ear
Wearing Style true wireless
Ear Tips XS, S, M, L
Weight 0.0 kg / 0.0 lbs

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Driver Size 8.4
Drivers 1
Freq Min 20
Freq Max 40000
Impedance 48
Sensitivity 102
Hi-Res Audio Yes
Codecs AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround 360 Reality Audio

Noise Control

ANC Yes
ANC Type adaptive
Transparency Yes

Connectivity

Wireless Yes
Bluetooth 5.3
Profiles A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP
Multipoint Yes
Wired Connector USB-C
Range 10

Earbud Battery

Battery Life 8
Charge Time 2
Fast Charging 3 Minutes for 1 Hour
Charging USB-C

Case Battery

Case Battery 24
Case Charging USB-C
Wireless Charging Yes

Microphone

Microphone Yes
Mic Count 6
NC Mic Yes

Features

Voice Assistant Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa
Touch Controls Yes
App Sony Headphones Connect
Volume Limiting No
Gaming Mode Yes
Bone Conduction Yes
Water Resistance IPX4

vs Competition

The Technics EAH-AZ100 is the most interesting alternative right now. It matches the Sony on sound quality in most blind tests and has a more consistent fit for a lot of ears. The Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro undercuts the Sony on price while delivering ANC that's close enough for most commuters. And if you're in the Apple ecosystem, the AirPods Pro 3rd Generation is still the obvious choice for seamless integration, even if the Sony beats it on raw audio fidelity. The JLab JBuds Pods ANC is the budget pick, but it's not in the same league sonically.

Spec Sony WF-1000XM5 Technics EAH-AZ100 JBL Live Beam 3 JLab JBuds IEUEBJBANCRBLK82 Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050 Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless MTW3
Form Factor in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic
Wireless true true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation true true true true true true
Bluetooth Version 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.2
Battery Life Hours 8 8 12 9 6 7
Case Battery Hours 24 28 48 42 18 28
Water Resistance IPX4 IPX4 IP55 IP55 IPX4 IPX4
Multipoint true true true true true false
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortUser SentimentConnectivityGebruikersoordeelAffordability
Sony WF-1000XM5 97.597.478.798.873.393.211.899.962.55.9
Technics EAH-AZ100 Compare 97.597.478.799.776.893.292.599.881.23
JBL Live Beam 3 Compare 97.597.490.892.493.193.233.597.381.212.4
JLab JBuds IEUEBJBANCRBLK82 Compare 93.597.490.881.986.993.2095.995.531.4
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050 Compare 97.58178.796.244.469.853.197.389.74.7
Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless MTW3 Compare 97.597.478.799.675.193.2088.243.714.4

Prijs

Value & Pricing

Here's the thing: the WF-1000XM5 is expensive, and the price spread is wild. In the US you'll see these anywhere from $129 to $325 depending on the vendor, and in Canada the range runs from CAD 280 to CAD 430. If you're buying new at full price, you're paying a premium for a product with documented reliability concerns. But if you can snag a refurbished pair at the low end of that range, the value proposition flips completely. Just make sure you're buying from a vendor with a solid return policy, because you might need it.

Price History

MX$ 2.000 MX$ 4.000 MX$ 6.000 MX$ 8.000 MX$ 10.000 15 jul4 nov MX$ 4.684

Lees meer

Overview

The Sony WF-1000XM5 is a frustrating masterpiece. On paper, it's the best true wireless earbud Sony has ever made, with sound quality that sits in the 99th percentile of our database and noise cancelling that's still among the best on the market. But the user sentiment score of 62/100 tells a messier story. Owners love the audio and hate the reliability. If you get a good pair, you'll be thrilled. If you get a bad one, you'll be back on Amazon writing a one-star rant about Bluetooth dropouts.

Common Questions

Q: Are the WF-1000XM5 better than the WF-1000XM4?

Sound-wise, yes. The XM5 has a more refined driver and better clarity in the highs. But a lot of owners say the ANC took a step backward, and the fit is more finicky. If you already have the XM4 and they work fine, this isn't a must-upgrade.

Q: Do these work well with iPhone?

They work, but you're leaving performance on the table. iPhones don't support LDAC, so you're stuck with AAC. The sound is still good, but if you're deep in the Apple ecosystem, the AirPods Pro 3rd Generation is the smoother choice.

Q: Are they good for working out?

IPX4 water resistance means they'll survive sweat and light rain, and the 6g weight makes them easy to forget. But the fit issues are a real problem for workouts. If they don't stay in your ears while sitting at a desk, they won't stay in during a run.

Who Should Skip This

If you need earbuds that just work every single time you pull them out of the case, skip these. The Bluetooth complaints are too consistent to ignore, and the fit is a gamble. Go get the Technics EAH-AZ100 or the Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro instead. And if you're on a budget, the JLab JBuds Pods ANC gets you 80% of the experience for a fraction of the price.

Verdict

The WF-1000XM5 is the best-sounding true wireless earbud Sony has ever shipped, and one of the best-sounding earbuds period. But the reliability complaints are real, and the fit is polarizing. If you're willing to roll the dice on quality control and you can find a deal, buy them. If you need something that just works every single day, look at the Technics or the Samsung instead.

Usage Scores

Calls (97.5)Music (100)Algemeen (84.8)Budget (84.2)Gaming (100)Travel (97)Commute (100)Fitness (96.2)
  • Calls97.5
  • Music100
  • Algemeen84.8
  • Budget84.2
  • Gaming100
  • Travel97
  • Commute100
  • Fitness96.2

Vergelijkbare producten